Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-8081-

­

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-24 11:53

So we can't have the s­ecret soc­iety anymore because this place is now full of retarded /g/ros, our culture is now dead. You can go to the fields and commit seppuku there. Sayonara.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-24 11:55

Sorry to tell you this but you are from /g/. I remember /prog/ being full of /g/ people since 2008/2011, most people here since back then are /pro/g/riders

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-24 12:21

>>2
Sure, some people found this site on /g/. That doesn't mean they have to bring their retarded customs and catchphrases. It's hard to read someone who can't even form a proper phrase without dropping at least one /g/ meme.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-24 12:34

Sorry to tell you this but I never wasted my time in that specific board. I remember /prog/ back in 2008 being full of 1st year CS students thinking how awesome LISP was. It was so lame that the only reason to be there was shitposting, but it was fun and, sometimes, even interesting. Shitposting is still the only reason to visit /prog/, but the quality of the threads is so bad lately (e.g. ``event handling vs switch'') that it doesn't require my shitposting anymore... I came here last year after the massive spam in world4ch, things were different.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-24 12:46

>>4
2008 was fine in my opinion
what was wrong with ``event handling vs switch''?

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-24 13:22

>>5
Reading some old threads, from 2005-2006 for instance, you can see how the quality was always in a perpetual decline, but the culture remained pretty much the same for at least half a decade... but at some point moot added links to the text boards in almost every image board, and then a massive migration of /g/rotesque faggots happened destroying all /prog/rider's heritage. Finally moot shut down world4ch and those faggots came here.
what was wrong with ``event handling vs switch''?
that's like asking what is wrong with ``object oriented vs apes''

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-24 13:26

that's like asking what is wrong with ``object oriented vs apes''
but it is not

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-24 13:30

Actually ``object oriented vs apes'' would be a nice /prog/ quality thread

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-24 13:54

The /g/ros will never my break ｍｙ　ｊａｐａｎｅｓｅ　ｓｐｉｒｉｔ

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-24 15:13

My Grandfather smoked his whole life. I was about 10 years old when my mother said to him, 'If you ever want to see your grandchildren graduate, you have to stop immediately.'. Tears welled up in his eyes when he realized what exactly was at stake. He gave it up immediately. Three years later he died of lung cancer. It was really sad and destroyed me. My mother said to me- 'Don't ever smoke. Please don't put your family through what your Grandfather put us through." I agreed. At 28, I have never touched a cigarette. I must say, I feel a very slight sense of regret for never having done it, because your post gave me cancer anyway.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-24 15:17

>>10
I love you, I love your post(s), I read it 10 times, please keep posting!

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-24 16:57

>>10

*likes*, *thumbs up* *+1*

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-24 18:10

So, what should be done, you putrid faggot?

If posts start getting deleted topically, everyone has an autistic fit.
If nothing gets deleted outside of spam, this happens, and you whine about the board turning to shit.

Kill yourself.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-24 19:15

DECENTRALIZED MODERATION

Sorry for disappointing you, everyone. I should've worked on DistBB instead of prostituting myself for corporate interests and academia.

Signed,
the DistBB guy

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-24 19:18

>>13
He is the back to X faggot who asks everything to get deleted
ignore him

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-24 20:08

>>4
The question was not ``event handling vs switch'', in fact there was no question like that. The question's name was ``Question about event handling'' and it asked about using a switch in or callbacks in a very specific situation of event handling. All the replies in the thread were shitty by people who have no idea about these things, nobody uses only callbacks for something like this (callbacks would be used only some parts maybe like for rebinding keys).

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-24 20:38

>>13
If posts start getting deleted topically, everyone has an autistic fit.
No, Admin-sama. Only one or two faggots get mad when shitposting gets deleted. You have my unconditional support when deleting anything that resembles /g/ shitposting.

>>14
Welcome back.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-24 20:46

>>17
You remind me of people who hate gays because they are gays themselfs.
You hate /g/ people while you are one of them.
Finaly I would like to request from you to stop spamming the board with ``back to /g/'' or things like that

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-24 20:48

>>18
Fuck off, I'm not the retard who keeps spamming that shit and I hope you and that imbecile to die a slow painful death. Enough with the redirections.

Name: >>19 2014-06-24 20:51

>>18
Enough with the redirections and the LOL YOU MUST BE FROM /G/REDDITUMBLRBOOK GO BACK THERE XDDDDD remarks already. You're worse than the shitposting children as you're encouraging them to make worse posts by taking their ``epic trolling'' straight up your ass.

Is it that hard to ignore them?

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-24 21:00

>>19,20
Why are you so upset? Why should I have a painful dead? And why are you saying these mean things to me? It is really annoying.
And since your posts shows that you supidly assume[1] that I have replied to these posts let me ``explain'' that I have not replied to them, if there was someone that is encouraging them by ``taking their ``epic trolling'' straight up'' his ass it's you since I am not the one who made a stupid thread over a few shitposters.

Is it that hard to ignore them?
Let me make the same question to you since this is what I am doing, I am ignoring them since the start

___________________________
[1]: ``You're worse than the shitposting children as you're encouraging them to make worse posts by taking their ``epic trolling'' straight up your ass'' -->>20

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-24 21:06

>>20
Is it that hard to ignore them?
Many times they reply to themselves, you know. I've actually been surprised at how often this happens, being able to see IPs and such. In at least 2 out of 3 threads, the OP or some other retard spawns 3 or 4 tangential topics by replying to their own posts in baiting ways.

To the people who have enough time to do this in multiple threads and spam the board continuously: Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you? Don't have you something better to do? You're on this site more than I am, and I'm the fucking admin.

Also, since we're on /lounge/, pseudo-[noun] retard, you can stop using proxies to post, it's not like I've banned you even once. At least use SOCKS proxies instead of HTTP forward ones.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-24 21:07

>>21
Sorry, there was no valid reason to direct that at you. There's still a couple of idiots who keep getting ``trolled'' though.

I didn't make this thread but I understand >>1-san's complaint. I'm upset because the very first weeks of this board were blissfully calm and on-topic. Looks like we can't have that anymore unless the idiots get punished or something.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-24 21:11

Time to call it quits, Yannick. You've been OUTED.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-24 21:12

>>18
keep telling you that /g/ro... but, I have to say one more thing: it doesn't matter if you came from /g/ or from reddit, the problem is that you come here using your retarded memes instead of our BRILLIANT BBCODE maymays!

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-24 21:44

>>25
Imagine an explosive mudslime visiting Israel. The Jews get mad because this Muslim is wearing a big rag on his head and not a kippah, as it's done in Israel. As someone who doesn't live in the Middle East, you might want to make a joke like

"it doesn't matter if you came from iraq or lebanon, the problem is that you come here using your retarded headrag instead of our superior kippah!"

You feel superior for making that joke and go back to reading your funny cat macros.

I know, I know, you're being sarcastic. Still, why make that post? Leave Jews and Muslims alone. If you hate Jews for wearing a retarded hat instead of another retarded hat, why don't you just ignore Jews and Muslims altogether? Since you are obviously not into such idiotic customs, you could just go somewhere else and not bother with them.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-24 21:55

>>26

Shalom!

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-24 22:08

>>27
Peace be upon you, Jewish brother!

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-24 22:10

>>23
there was no valid reason to direct that at you
I have to say sorry too then, please accept my apologies, I think I got over defencive
Way too bad was IMHO the last weeks with the (anti-)SJW posting

>>22
Would a way to stop this be stopping replying to the replies, right?

>>25
the problem is that you come here using your retarded memes instead of our BRILLIANT BBCODE maymays!
If you talk about the guy that the last days keeps spamming the ``implying'' meme then I have to agree but he will stop only if the other retard stops responding to him

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-24 22:26

>>29
I'm that other retard. I won't ever reply any of his posts again.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-24 22:45

he will stop only if the other retard stops responding to him
and that will never happen...

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-24 23:19

>>31
Read >>30 you lazy imbecile

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-24 23:25

I was once against the moderation of /prog/. I never thought I would say this but I'm ok with these posters having their ability to speak removed. They have lost their privilege to share their thoughts with us. It seems they are unable to think. They can only repeat a small set of phrases like a television that plays infomercials continuously.

>>22
On /g/ the post rate is faster so to keep a thread on the front page long enough for it to start the OP will customarily bump it repeatedly with posts intended to bait posters. Here there is no worry for a thread falling down, but it is boring to make a post and not immediately gain replies. So they continue to bait and talk to themselves until they get one. They are used to the instant gratification of the image boards and aren't accustomed to the concept of a conversation lasting weeks. As a result, the end up dominating the entire board until every thread is about them.

>>30,31
If you ignore them they will just reply to themselves or spam slogans regardless. Recall the BSD/Gentoo spammer from old dead /prog/.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-24 23:27

>>33
To know what threads need to get deleted we need to set some standards first, what posts should get deleted?

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-24 23:33

>>33,34
You just provided some good criteria. Although it's risky to delete posts like if there were no tomorrow, anything that is blatant imageboard shitposting or resembles those ``ephemeral'' posts that inflate threads without much content should be deleted.

I'd start slowly with the very obvious things like ``implying'' or any other misuse of the quote function that's popular on the imageboards. It would be sad if things like the eventual bampu pantsu were to be deleted though.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-24 23:36

>>34
I'm in favor of bans for those that spam /g/ memes and bait the entire board into replying to them. I would prefer the bans to be temporary but I'll leave that up the admin-sama. It will reduce work on his part if the bans are long or forever.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-24 23:43

>>36
I would delete (as warrning) -> tempban

>>35
please keep us updated

Name: >>37 2014-06-24 23:47

>>35
One more thing, I would be against the removal of `>greentexting since it is not used as spam/by the spamers but more like as a joke

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 0:02

>>38
No, this is precisely what has fucked us over. How are you going to stop the actual imageboarders if that's pretty much the only thing they can do?
Joke? It isn't even funny.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 0:13

>>33-39
Yeah, no, sorry goyim, but moderating this site isn't my full time job. I have enough things to do, I'm probably one of the people who browses this site the least.

Furthermore, even if I were to idly check every once in a while and use the awful admin interface to track down these posts and delete them, it would only give me more work to do, as the shitheads who post in that manner will get upset and will begin to find shitty SOCKS proxies online and either auto-spam or manually shitpost all over the place.

Make a greasemonkey script or some shit and just filter those posts.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 0:17

>>39
agree, in some way that's how old this shit started...

from >>33:
On /g/ the post rate is faster so to keep a thread on the front page long enough for it to start the OP will customarily bump it repeatedly with posts intended to bait posters. Here there is no worry for a thread falling down, but it is boring to make a post and not immediately gain replies. So they continue to bait and talk to themselves until they get one. They are used to the instant gratification of the image boards and aren't accustomed to the concept of a conversation lasting weeks. As a result, the end up dominating the entire board until every thread is about them.
Maybe this should be added into the FAQ, with some mention on the old "every thread will be replied to, NO EXCEPTIONS!"

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 0:27

>>40
wtf admin, iirc you said you were going to moderate this board a bit...
we need distbb with something like hashcash instead of captchas

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 1:03

>>40
I have enough things to do

Hah, I bet you do! All these cocks arent going to themselves, after all[i]!/[i]

Name: the distbb guy 2014-06-25 2:21

>>42
wtf admin, iirc you said you were going to moderate this board a bit...
He did say a bit.

we need distbb with something like hashcash instead of captchas
I did come up with a hashcash-like thing for DistBB (with the advantage of being memory-hard to prevent GPU acceleration), I should have released it but I've been busy and lazy (busy when working, and lazy and comatose when not). I'm sorry for letting you down, everyone.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 2:26

>>44
It's okay, it's not like we have any expectations of any ``Internet buddies'' project ever.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 3:17

>>40
I would never ask you to moderate. However if you are casually reading and a post enrages you to the point of taking the effort to delete it, I wont complain.

>>44
Don't worry. I will write distbb! You are welcome to post feedback as it is created.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 3:56

>>42
I do the minimum amount that's necessary (making sure the site stays alive, deleting actual floodspam, server-side maintenance shit, etc). I've mostly lost interest otherwise. If I were to actually invest myself into it, you all probably wouldn't like it anyway. I have a feeling I'd just go insane and start fucking with all of you. I maintain a great level of detachment from this site as a whole, to the point that sometimes I forget I host it.
>>43
They won't themselves, indeed.
>>44
No one was expecting anything anyway. I don't think any /prog/ project has ever really materialized.
>>46
However if you are casually reading and a post enrages you to the point of taking the effort to delete it, I wont complain.
That would make me a faggot. Unlike everyone else who, if put in my position, would just start banning everything they dislike and anyone who insults them in any way, I actually make it a point not to ban or delete based on personal tastes/reasons/feeling, unless someone truly goes out of their way to pick a fight with me (flooding/making many threads calling me out/...).

Unless we're discussing site issues, I post anonymously like the rest of you, and I've been told to go back to /g/ or called ``new'' more than once. It's funny, more than anything, some of the posts on here are irritating, but honestly I mostly don't give a shit. Really the only ``subjective'' criteria I use for deletion at times is when I see someone who thinks this site is their personal playground and they posting the same bullshit in too many threads or creating many threads about their retarded bullshit. It's spammy and annoying and I've taken care of it in the few times it has happened.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 5:29

This place is alright, but for the idiots complaining.

I wish admin would issue bans everytime he saw ``BACK 2 LEGEE!!!''
/oldprog/ was not some magical /g/ro-free retard paradise. You are a newfaggot if you think that. And stop having an autistic fit when a non /prog/™ proprietary meme such as ``faggot quotes''™ is used. Your secret club's meme spouting is just as ``idiotic''.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 5:31

>>48
PS: Too much angsty sage is used on this site, fuck off with that already you whiny bastards.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 6:41

>>39
shitposters don't `>greentext, the just quote wrongly
(usualy by saying >implying), most (if not all) the times they know that this is not how quotes work. I would be also against the removal of helpful/informative posts using these things

>>47
and I've been told to go back to /g/ or called ``new'' more than once
oh the irony

>>48-49
I get your point and I actually have to semy-agree with you. As I said(?) before I think that the people that say back to /g/ and believe these things are new people (from /g/) impressed(?) by /prog/ and trying to fit in.

``faggot quotes''
How about ""nigger quotes""?

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 6:48

By the way, how many users are using /prog/, admin? (and how did you counted them?) I want to make some statistics about /prog/

And how is DistBB going to work with distrobuted moderation?

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 7:38

>>51
There's only 3. You, me, and the Sussman.

Seriously though, I haven't counted. I can't be bothered. From a quick glance in the admin panel, there's maybe 20-50 different individuals posting within a 6 hour timeframe? The range depends heavily on the time.

I'm sure the amount who browse is easily 10 times that, but I don't keep HTTP logs so I wouldn't be able to check.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 7:40

>>52
there's maybe 20-50 different individuals posting within a 6 hour timeframe
I had 10-20 total in my mind totaly
but I am not sure if this can be trusted because of dynamic IPs, tor and proxies

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 7:49

>>53
Here, actually. In the past 2 weeks, 288 unique IPs have posted to /prog/.

So, probably 90 people at best. If you take into account dynamic IPs and people using shitty proxies that go down often.

Realistically there is probably 30 to 40 regulars who are on at different times.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 7:50

and I've been told to go back to /g/ or called ``new'' more than once
Would you mind showing once when this happened by the way?

this site is their personal playground
I would like an example for this too if you don't mind

Thanks

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 12:09

>>55
I'm pretty sure he deleted the Brazilian kike's posts. That fucking retard keeps spamming his PUA apping bullshit every time he has the chance.

I'm surprised Luke hasn't been banned yet though.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 13:01

>>56

Why would he ban Luke? Are you a fucking kike? Luke is official /prog/ heritage

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 13:16

The more I think about it, the more agree with >>48's post. It seems that the people who are screaming about this have extrime optinions (see >>56) and the only they want is to not have outside memes or people from other sites. This is not going to help the quality of /prog/ at all because shitposting is deep inside the /prog/'s culture and this is not a bad thing but it is harmful wannting to destroy /prog/'s culture while they pretend to be real ``original'' /prog/riders themselfs. They are just a small minority that seem like they are many people because they scream more.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 13:22

>>57
Because he's an insufferable kangaroo fucker? I admit I'm slowly starting to like him though.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 13:28

>>48
/oldprog/ was not some magical /g/ro-free retard paradise.
It was before they put up that link on /g/. Stop deluding yourself, you ``it's always been shit'' faggots are no better than the ``i miss the good old days'' niggers. In case you don't remember, there were two occasions where links to /prog/ were put on /g/, though everyone seems to remember only the last one (which was about one year). Before even that happened, there were quite a few /b/ posters. Believe it or not, they behaved better than /g/ crossboarders.

Your secret club's meme spouting is just as ``idiotic''.
Read >>26. Both ``cultures'' are stupid, sure. That doesn't have anything with one ``culture'' completely taking over the other without their consent, though. Please stop using that as the argument for letting imageboarders shitpost at their will, that is not a valid reason and it will never be.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 13:32

>>60
instale gentio

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 13:46

>>60
I knew many /g/ people who were posting on /prog/ before that
Please stop assuming things

Please stop using that as the argument for letting imageboarders shitpost at their will
Everyone shitposts, the only different is that you want a secred club with only your kind of shitposting

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 13:54

>>62
Before what? Before the second time the link was on /g/? Yes, I'm not denying that. The meme spewing started after the second time.

the only different is that you want a secred club with only your kind of shitposting
Could you please tell me what's wrong with that? Did you read >>26? Dude, I get it, both ``clubs'' are fucking retarded, but how does that give a retard from club 1 the power of totally destroying retard club 2? What kind of shithole do you live in that accepts this kind of behavior? Again, if you think both clubs are retarded, what are you doing in both clubs?

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 13:56

>>63
It is not /prog/ then, it is a community about programming with some /prog/ memes without the rest of the culture (shit/fun posting, vip quality etc...)
Do you want /prog/ or just a programming board?

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 13:59

>>26

I don't hate kikes for wearing retarded hats hats, I hate kikes because of their shameless exploitation of the Holohoax, which they blew out of proportion thanks to the falsified reports that they forged in many of the post-war kangaroo courts. It has been over 60 years ago, yet you're still using it as an excuse to get a free pass on EVERYTHING: the insane manipulation of media, the lobbying, the atrocities you're committing against the Palestinians in the lands you STOLE thanks to your Jew friends in the United Kingdom.
Everyone knows what you're doing and you've been doing in these 50 years, the only reason this spiral of silence still exists today is because you'd be called a Nazi, an anti-semite, you'de be ostracized from society.
Can you imagine a Kurd terrorist being excused because 90 years ago the Ottomans attempted to kill his people? It would be inexcusable, but then again Jews have their friends in Hollywood who love to line their pockets by tugging at goyim's heartstrings.
I'm fucking sick and tired of your slimeball tactics. If you really have the support of people in the western hemisphere then are you still wasting no effort to influence and manipulate public opinione, kikes?

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 14:03

>>65
the atrocities you're committing against the Palestinians in the lands you STOLE thanks to your Jew friends in the United Kingdom.
palestinians are mudslimes, even kikes are better

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 14:11

>>64
That's exactly what I'm trying to say. Since when have ``greentext'' and ``implying'' been part of /prog/ culture?

I want /prog/ to be like the first weeks of this board: on-topic content seasoned with some VIP quality shitposting. Not this unoriginal lelele implying shit.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 14:15

>>67
Again, this is not even close to the original prog. You just want a programming textboard, with some /prog/ memes, nothing too close to the original /prog/.
You whining is just like saying ``No, my memes are better, your memes suk and you should not post them'', the secred club thing I said before

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 14:30

>>68
You just want a programming textboard, with some /prog/ memes, nothing too close to the original /prog/.
You must be confused. The original /prog/ shitposting has been more frequent on /lounge/. Take a look at this:
http://progrider.org/lounge/read/1389702001
http://progrider.org/lounge/read/1397733872
http://progrider.org/lounge/read/1391539547
http://progrider.org/lounge/read/1381169519
http://progrider.org/lounge/read/1383111081
http://progrider.org/lounge/read/1381647954
http://progrider.org/lounge/read/1380716448
http://progrider.org/prog/read/1378222308
http://progrider.org/prog/read/1378363384
http://progrider.org/prog/read/1379072823
http://progrider.org/prog/read/1379296804

If all those don't scream old /prog/, I don't know what else does.

You whining is just like saying ``No, my memes are better, your memes suk and you should not post them'', the secred club thing I said before
I already said many fucking times, what the fuck is wrong with wanting that? Do whatever you want, but please don't bring the greentext retardation and tell us we should accept it because you say so.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 14:37

>>68
Are you GAY?
Are you a NIGGER?
Are you a GAY NIGGER?

If you answered "Yes" to all of the above questions then GNAA (Gay Nigger Association of America) might be just what you've been looking for!

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 14:37

>>69
And this is where I stop replying to retarded trolls

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 14:39

>>65-66
What's wrong with Jews being confined to Israel? It's a great containment area. I don't care if mudslimes or kikes get killed in the process as long as the kikes stay in their beloved sacred desert and stay out of my white lawn.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 14:40

>>70
I always though this post was funny

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 14:41

>>71
What part of my post is ``retarded trolling''? Fuck off.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 15:05

>>74
The ``Do whatever you want, but please don't bring the greentext retardation and tell us we should accept it because you say so.''
It feels like you purposely misunderstand what I said to make me seem like a retarded ``/g/ro''. I never even said that I liked memes in the first place, because I do not (>>70 is a exeption)
That was the reason of calling you like this

I already said many fucking times, what the fuck is wrong with wanting that
The secred elitistic club is wrong with this, You have not given yet one reason why they are harmful except that they annoy you. Some memes may annoy me too but I am not crying like a looser

but how does that give a retard from club 1 the power of totally destroying retard club 2
How does it destroy it? By using the archive tools you can clearly see that /prog/ memes are on /g/ just like /g/ memes are on /prog/. I see nothing wrong with that, no culture is getting destroyed by that, they just get merged (partly). What is going to clearly kill the /prog/ culture is your behavior (that I have talked way too much in the older posts)

If all those don't scream old /prog/, I don't know what else does.
Yes, a limited number of theards most on /lounge/, most of these are in /lounge/ because of this behavior ``/prog/ shall not be posted on /prog/'' or more like ``kill the /prog/ culture and replace it with one that I like more''

You must be confused. The original /prog/ shitposting has been more frequent on /lounge/. Take a look at this:
This has nothing to do with what I said at all

I have more to say but this is for now

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 15:07

To add
With that behavior you will end up having almost every thread that is even a little offtopic/has a bit of shitposting getting replies like ``back to /g/'' or some shit like this, even on lounge

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 15:16

>>70
Rejoice! http://gnaa.eu/ is back.

>>72

It's not a containment area, it's a breeding ground. Did the creation of Israel cleansed the west of yids? No! Israel only brings more power the overlords of zion.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 15:17

I became depressed and stressed by this thread
Can we calm down please?

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 15:39

>>75
I see nothing wrong with that, no culture is getting destroyed by that, they just get merged
SHALOM!

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 15:40

>>79
E-Exacly?

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 15:43

I am just saying to delete spam or spammy things
All the posts that got deleted I think that were meeting that criteria

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 15:46

>>78

I agree, let's go back to talking about Abelson's fat schlong and anuses.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 15:49

>>82
Agree 100%
*Grabs dick*
*Punishes penis*

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-25 22:59

>>75
It feels like you purposely misunderstand what I said to make me seem like a retarded ``/g/ro''
No, but from your posts it looked like you were defending the /g/ catchphrases a bit too much. Sorry if I misunderstood.

What is going to clearly kill the /prog/ culture is your behavior
I've said this many times: I'm not the back to /g/ retard. Telling people to go back to /g/ only makes things worse, I agree with you on that.

You have not given yet one reason why they are harmful except that they annoy you.
This is based on experience, but /g/ people are more vocal about their customs. It degrades their text into massive balls of text. The signal to noise ratio is very low because they think they're funny for overusing their ``memes''. The discussion lowers its standards and now everyone makes repetitive remarks in order to fit in.

/prog/ abuses their own catchphrases too but they have the delicacy of not bumping the thread when doing so. Some low quality posts get replies of similar quality, and that's why you see *grabs dick*s on Javashit threads. My point being, /g/ has a very low content to meme ratio, /prog/'s higher. This is why I don't want /g/ culture to be accepted here. I wouldn't like to invade /g/ with our retardation either and that's one of the reasons I don't go on /g/.

most of these are in /lounge/ because of this behavior ``/prog/ shall not be posted on /prog/''
I'm not the one who created /lounge/. I think it's worked well so far.

Besides, you're taking it too seriously. What Admin-sama did was standing on /prog/, drawing a big line and saying

``you people stand on this side of the line if you're feeling like funposting''

It's not like he's redirecting all the /prog/ content to Reddit, dude. /lounge/ is still part of /prog/.

By using the archive tools you can clearly see that /prog/ memes are on /g/
How is this my fault? They should stop doing that, but I have no control over the ones who do that.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-26 11:53

>>84
I see your point then. Thank you for explaining

but /g/ people are more vocal about their customs. It degrades their text into massive balls of text
I think they were not just average /g/ people, but spammer /g/roskis and most likely the same person (I believe this because of the way the /g/ memes were forced/spammed)

/prog/ abuses their own catchphrases too but they have the delicacy of not bumping the thread when doing so
This is true too but I have seen some /g/ people doing this too (rarely but true)

/g/ has a very low content to meme ratio, /prog/'s higher. This is why I don't want /g/ culture to be accepted here
Agree and I see your point

Besides, you're taking it too seriously. What Admin-sama did was standing on /prog/, drawing a big line and saying
You are right about that.

Here is what I think:
Remove posts that spam memes or try to force a /g/ meme but do not delete /g/ memes if they don't bump the thread and are rare (one per week or something) OR if they are informative.
The spammers of should always get deleted/banned

What about /g/ memes on /lounge/ that are not spam?

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-26 12:11

Ban this faggot http://bbs.progrider.org/lounge/read/1403632539/14

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-26 14:03

Ban this male homosexual http://bbs.progrider.org/lounge/read/1403617998/86

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-26 14:44

Ban this gay nigger homosexual african american http://bbs.progrider.org/lounge/read/1403617998/87

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-26 15:34

Ban Ki-Moon https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ban_Ki-moon

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-26 23:23

Ban the /lounge/ goy
http://bbs.progrider.org/prog/read/1403784637/6

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-28 14:01

http://bbs.progrider.org/prog/read/1403964040
dis/g/usting!
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode + RSS -