­

So we can't have the s­ecret soc­iety anymore because this place is now full of retarded /g/ros, our culture is now dead. You can go to the fields and commit seppuku there. Sayonara.

>>42
I do the minimum amount that's necessary (making sure the site stays alive, deleting actual floodspam, server-side maintenance shit, etc). I've mostly lost interest otherwise. If I were to actually invest myself into it, you all probably wouldn't like it anyway. I have a feeling I'd just go insane and start fucking with all of you. I maintain a great level of detachment from this site as a whole, to the point that sometimes I forget I host it.
>>43
They won't themselves, indeed.
>>44
No one was expecting anything anyway. I don't think any /prog/ project has ever really materialized.
>>46

However if you are casually reading and a post enrages you to the point of taking the effort to delete it, I wont complain.

That would make me a faggot. Unlike everyone else who, if put in my position, would just start banning everything they dislike and anyone who insults them in any way, I actually make it a point not to ban or delete based on personal tastes/reasons/feeling, unless someone truly goes out of their way to pick a fight with me (flooding/making many threads calling me out/...).

Unless we're discussing site issues, I post anonymously like the rest of you, and I've been told to go back to /g/ or called ``new'' more than once. It's funny, more than anything, some of the posts on here are irritating, but honestly I mostly don't give a shit. Really the only ``subjective'' criteria I use for deletion at times is when I see someone who thinks this site is their personal playground and they posting the same bullshit in too many threads or creating many threads about their retarded bullshit. It's spammy and annoying and I've taken care of it in the few times it has happened.