4chan dipshit dissing me

Anonymous Wed 19 Mar 2025 01:26:47 No.2905404 Report

Quoted By: >>2910433,1
>>At least he hasn't followed up on the requests to post the code to his solution... given that it's already ~250k lines of C++ that doesn't actually do much of anything yet. :o (also, it's one function, aside from the thousands of global variables outside the function.)
The funniest parts of yanderedev and mikeeUSA programming schizophasia combined
https://archived.moe/diy/thread/2905124/#q2905404

>>2905404
In QuakeC every time you address an array, a global is used.
Every time you compare to a number that was yet to be in the code, a global is used.
Every time you add a string, a global is used.

And every time you add a setting, a global is used.
DIP FUCKING SHIT.

There is literally NO WAY to not "use globals" in quakeC.
unless you have a program that never compares anything,
doesn't use any settings,
and never uses a string or array.

No making a "local array" doesn't change that.

if (a == 1) { ///Here you now have a global defining "1".

if (a == 'bla') { //Now you have another global defining "bla"


void someroutine () { //and now you wasted another global since you have a subroutine

if (autocvar_g_mysetting_in_config_file == 2) { //here you just used 2 globals.
if (autocvar_g_OTHERmysetting_in_OTHERconfig_file == 2) { //here you used another (1) global for the setting, however "2" allready exists so it doesn't waste one


.float someentityfloat; //Here you wasted another global, adding another field to the entities.

So stop fucking dissing me about it. dipshit faggots that don't know shit about QuakeC.
You want me to come kill you fucks?
You thing QuakeC is C?

You think your "local" defines in QuakeC do much?}}}}}

Note: I already know what you're about to type, dipshit Breakroom fuck: "Duurrr don't use shitty language den!!!"

Fuck you you piece of fucking shit.
You always have an "out" so you're "right" rehtorically.
I WILL fucking kill you (since you oppose men marrying young virgin girls; a right given by YHWH (Devarim 22 verse 28, ancient hebrew, greek, latin)

For other things C is used in the engine and doesn't present these limitations; however the engine is not the right place to do all programming.

You might wonder why QuakeC does this.
Because it has to run on both little endian and bigendian computers.
This is it's solution.
Thus == 1 is not a bytecode for 1 (00000001). It is a reference.
The reference resolves to (00000001) or (10000000) or (1000000) or (...floating point values thereof) (ex: 10000001 or some other value meaning "no float and positive, and 1") Depending on the architecture, pre-computed.

e p-N-p

The Neutron is a proton with a close electron (e P)
Maybe the proton is 2 positrons with a massive Negative thing
(p-N-p)
Maybe like in a tre-foil configuration.
Maybe they are in a configuration like mickey ears
Maybe the Neutron is the close electron is caught between the influence of the two positrons, while repelled by the massive N egative thing.
e
p p
\N/

Maybe the Negative thing is lots of positrons and electrons very closely coupled. And the stable arrangement of these is an arrangement with an odd number of positrons vs electrons with the electrons outnumbering the positrons by 1. Maybe the massive thing is like a 3 sided pyramid or something.

Maybe an anti-matter Proton (negatron?) is a configuration where the above is inverted, where the number of positrons outnumbers the electrons in the massive N thing, and then 2 electrons are attracted to be near it (e-A-e).


Maybe all the randome 100s of different short lived things the collider makes are non-stable broken versons of the massive thing.
And it's all positrons and electrons all the way down.

Maybe spin is the way the mickey-ear thing is pointing.

hey mikee why do you even bother posting on 4chan wheen the jannies just bann you b4 anything useful gets discussed?

>>8
I'm eventually going to kill them for that.

>>8
4chan used to have a different set of jannies that weren't women and military intelligence.
Now our enemies rule over us even there: as part of full spectrum dominance.
Notice the psychological techniques they use: repetition, dissimulation, and when that fails, censorship.
It's out of a text book.

The only counter to that is to torture and kill them physically.

>https://archived.moe/g/thread/105017321/#q105019466

Mikee has been working on anthology so long that it no longer starts on modern operating systems. Failure of environment reproducability- the only person who can run it is him.

Is it better to go forward in time or back in time?
You cannot make an old system work with features that didn't exist when it was installed.
Is the same true of using old ways with a new system?

If so, then the new system is simply trying to make you reliant on the new people professing that new system.

The fact is: euniches and women did not build Linux/GNU/etc (infact, Gnu is Not Unix). They have incompatabily extended the new systems so as to make you reliant on them ("What would you ever do without us women and euniches (transsexuals/etc))

An attempt to have women and those professing to be such as your saviour; as they claim to be by birthing you.
Should you thank those who ripped your soul out from the world and put it in a corpreal body? Do you enjoy the waking times more than the dream_s inwhich you sleep?

>>8
How many people post on 4chan?
I think it's regonalized/silo'd
Once in awhile they'll allow a world-wide thread like election etc and you get 100,000 posts spanning 500 pages very quickly.

All other posts across the site displayed to you only have a handful of posts.

Sadly my node doesn't give me any C programmers to converse with.
I get dipshits like Rika who hate C.
Which doesn't help me.

He refuses to bother to learn. It isn't that much more difficult than any other language.

White faggots claiming mary was 16:
https://archived.moe/pol/thread/503043129/

Nope, was younger than that.
Notice how the whites don't question it.

>https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/105017070/#105026160
>https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/105017070/#q105026173
>Ok bla bla bla xonotic ynnart but what are you doing about it? You could put a huge finger up xon devs poophole and yet you choose to keep using an unreadable font and make your game unwelcoming.
>Also where the fuck is the xon map that has lolicon images in it? I've heard that rumor and yet see no proof of its existence, at this point xon lolicon map is just xon's bigfoot.

No, I don't think I will.

>https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/105017070/#q105027202
>There are only two types of programmers that work on shit nobody cares about. Schizo pedos and trannies.

>>105027202
>DURRR U SHUD DO THINGS OTHER PPL CARE ABOUT SO OTHER PPL R HAPPY
>4 FREE!

alot of the C programmers have died or retired, same for the developers of the original *nix userland components like X11. They have been replaced by the newer generation, not really by force, but because the projects were simply abandoned over time. This newer gen don't want to deal with C, so instead use languages with gc or mandatory RAII, etc. to help with managing the heap properly.

>>16
How about the newer generations of Zoomer/Alpha-gen dipshit fucks keep their hands off OTHER PEOPLES PROPERTY.
Namely the well working C projects.

Why don't they?
Essentially they want the "cred" and to CV launder.
So they attack and socially take over someone elses project and make bullshit changes (changing what libraries are used, changing requirements, etc) so they can claim it on their CV.

They do no real work, just cause problems.
As you said: the original authors are dead or not "engaged".
That is: if the project is completed, and needs no updates, the original copyright holders do not make more edits.

The Zoomer/Gen-Alpha / Indian dipshits then claim "LOOK ITS NOT BEING UPDATED, THAT MEANS ITS WRONG" "ABANDONED".

It's like polishing a rock forever: eventually it's round. You can't get it more round.

Now a game is different: since it's an artifice: has no goal or true value: that can be worked on forever. Because there is always less than the sum of the universe in the game. And a game's goal is to simulate a universe.

>>16
Zoomer/GenAlpha likes to make githubs of another project, and then claim they are the "real" project. Often this works. They also steal projects using code-of-conduct where the github trick doesn't work.

I know all these tricks. I forked nexuiz/xonotic because I wanted more stuff in it. But I payed them for the features I wanted in cash sent to germany. That made a good base for endless hacking.

>>16
>not really by force,
Notice the cope word:
"not _really_... by force".

IE: it was by coersion.
By force.

>>16
They could make their own Zoomer/Gen-Alpha OS and not ruin our linux etc. But they won't. Because they cannot and they do not like millenials, gen-X, boomers, etc that coded in C. So they are happy to take over and destroy what was given for free. They feel they "conquer" when they take over an old well working project and kick the "old maaalllesss" out.

They should be tortured and killed dead.

>>16
Zoomers claim that "everyone born before 1990 had lead poisoning" and this justifies them dismissing all C programmers and taking over and destroying their projects and having the founders banned from their own projects.

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/503029231/#q503035248

>>16
Remeber what the Zoomer faggots did to stallman?
Also to Torvalds?
CoC'd

>>16
Nicolae Miu is a great man.
May he feel the cool flowing water of the Apple River again.

The CV-fucking and other shitty zoom-zoom behaviors are because of crappy advice from career counsellors who told them to get into FOSS to get recognition; and that's absolutely a problem.
But the recent breaking changes in the *nix desktop ecosystem is absolutely just X11 dying and it's appointed successor, Wayland, originally made by the same people who did X11, is just not up to scratch, even being written in C; it still ends up being a crap system.

>Torvalds & Stallman CoC'd
Zoomers demand respect, half of them are old enough to drink, the rest nearly old enough to vote. It happens that the new generation does not care for religion, or pedos, or any sort of uncivil person; so they eject people from projects they now majorly control, just as you would eject a Muslim from your team if you had the power to, or any Zoomer.

We're old, man.

I'll also point out that somewhere around a third to a half of people under 20 have literally never seen a Bible or entered a church in their life, and alot of your religious ramblings are _genuinely_ falling on the ears of people who do not know Genesis 1:1 let alone the annals of the OT.

To put it into perspective for you, imagine if a zoomeer starting rambling about how they should be able to post the pride flag on /qa/ because Spock said in a book once that "Peace among enemies makes friends" and that them being ridiculed is the greatest evil in the world. Now imagine you did not know who Spock is, let alone the context of his character. That's how you sound to zoomers who have never been inside of a Church and raised by parents who do not believe in God.

>>24
I have no problem with muslims; since they are in favor of marrying little girls due to the 6 Bukari hadiths on the issue.

or pedos, or any sort of uncivil person; so they eject people from projects they now majorly control

The men who started those projects should murder those Zoomer fucks.
Like yourself.

You do not have the right to take over what you did not start, and eject those who were there before you.
You WILL be killed.

>That's how you sound to zoomers who have never been inside of a Church and raised by parents who do not believe in God.
Then I will kill them.
YHWH says to KILL anyone who entices you to follow another Power.
You take over our projects, eject us, and convert our property into yours.
We WILL KILL YOU

>>24
You do not have a right to demand anything of us.
YOU don't give us young little girl brides. and are THUS an enemy.

Historically Allies married their girls to their men.
Enemies did not.

You demand 1) our stuff. 2) our projects. 3) us to like it ("respect").
We ___WILL___ ___KILL__ you Zoomer FUCKS
You are pro-womens rights anti-loli pieces of shit.
We were promised in the late 80s and early 90s that marrying young girls was coming back. That was progress.

>>25
Obviously spock is a rip-off of Jesus, so I'd know by context what this was about.
And no: you can't pretend to be a non-Zoomer. It's obvious you are. Try again rika.

>>24
>But the recent breaking changes in the *nix desktop ecosystem is absolutely just X11 dying
Wrong.
>and it's appointed successor,
>Wayland, originally made by the same people who did X11,
Wrong. It's by some from Xorg: a fork of XFree86. Dipshit zoomer faggot.
It's like me forking Nexuiz/Xonotic, making a new thing.
Then Declaring the New Thing no good.
And then making a evenNewerThing
And declaring Nexuiz/Xonotic "no good" and you knowing this and claiming that Nexuiz/Xonotic indeed are no good because evenNewerThing is "made by the same guys who made Nexuiz/Xonotic.

You know you're lying. You're doing so intentionally.
Zoomer fuck.

is just not up to scratch, even being written in C; it still ends up being a crap system.

As was intended. There's nothing wrong with X11. It does what it was ment to. I'm using it right now. A solved problem. Wayland/SystemD/etc is embrace extend extinguish.

Part of the US govt's full spectrum dominance program : Linux was getting too secure with grsecurity etc; would have exposed the chip-level backdoors once the software was accounted for.

>>24 >>25
I disagree with every single thing you are trying to get me to agree with.
And I'll kill you dead for it if you want it to come to that.
Glad Nicolae killed some of you.

Nothing of what you say has any truth to it.
You're a retard who thinks I dislike muslims? What gave you that idea?
I'm infavor of every pro-child bride peoples. Your "white internet muslims" simply deny the hadiths.

>>24 >>25
You think I don't know the psycological technique "an open ear"?
IE: agree with small things, then introduce other little things to get me to agree to
Here's the huristic map of your prose, dipshit Rika FUCK:
1) Agree some zoomers are no good, BUT it's not their fault!
2-------8) Disagree with everything else and try to slice the salami.
9--10) INFACT they are RIGHT to Kick people like YOU of of THEIR projects they TOOK over, and they DEMAND RESPECT.

I'll kill you.
I WILL kill you.

I WILL KILL YOU

>>24 >>25
When you're sent to die in the east. I will not speak for you.

oh so that's why CEA can't run on any major distro. doesn't work with xorg. got it.

>>33
Works fine here.
Latest Devuan.

Works on windows 10, 7, etc aswell.
You didn't read the error message: which was that you lacked libjpeg6.so . Which is included as a deb file in the ISO.

I am _NOT_ going to update the build to include your new Zoomer-faggot libraries.
It wouldn't work on older distros if I did.

Also
>expecting a Linux build to work cross-platform
LOL.

Hey: ever tried compiling something yourself?
If you don't do that; then how are you a C programmer?
If you aren't a C programmer, how will you add map formats to the engine?
If you aren't adding map formats to the engine, why do I want you using my project?
What do I gain from it?

Answer these questions (you won't).

>>33
The funny thing is: you are complaining it doesn't work on X.
And yet I compiled it on Debian 7 (2012) and it works fine, those binaries, on this latest(to me, as of a year ago or so) Devuan distro.

Which I did not expect to happen.
So our experiances are different.
You claim
1) I should care if a linux build works/doesn't work for you
when
1) you are not me
2) not being me you cannot help me in my endeavor.
So why would I care?

Also an indian woman on devrant compiled it fine and said it was easy to compile; so if she can do it; without help; what's stopping you?
And why should I help you rika?
What value does that give me?

There's alot of pitfalls regarding compiling; if the box is "too old" you have to disable the ASM, if it's "too new" you have to change the library linking back to the default, if you're using a newer compiler you might have to apply the included patch since they changed something.
If you're on new macs you'll have to do alot of hacking to get it compiling.
Etc.

These are documented.
I didn't make these changes. Your Zoomer asshole faggots did. And I will not bow to them
Grsecurity did security right. Zoomer fucks change things just to make you "reliant" on them. But you know that. You "demand respect" by fucking up our projects.

>>33
Why would I care? Tell me.
Do you know how platforms get supported, and why?
1) Programmer uses those platforms
2) Makes them work. Because it's in his interest.

Why would I do the work to make it work on whatever you are using.
Am I you?
No I am not.

When I want to compile on windows 32bit, 2007, vs windows 7, vs windows 10, there are some things I do need to change in the makefiles. Not because it's impossible to build without those changes, but because the default GCC installed via "gnu for windows" is newer and Zoomer faggots changed the defaults for no honest reason other than to "make their mark". If I used an old GCC nothing would need to be changed. It can be built in the windows compilers too, on windows.

For linux, things seem to be smoother.
But you don't compile at all so don't know how it's done.

Guess your the guy, on 4chan, saying "did u fix your build system yet" for 4 years.
It's not broken for me though.

The defaults have changed by the way of your fellow Zoomer faggots. And it is not my job to tell you how to do your compiling. When the linker complains, you can google it or ask on discord.
Here's a hint: Get falcon's eye nethack compiling on a "modern" gcc.
Then you'll beable to link with your "modern" gcc here too.

You Zoomer scumbags changed the "way" C is written for no reason other than to make our old project look broken. But it is you who broke C.
Not us.

>>33
And I should make it run on your linux distro why? It runs on mine, including the latest Devuan I have (year or so ago). Why would I make it run on a distro that I do not use? (wayland, nu-this-or-that, etc).

Why would I care if your mouse spins around? I don't use wayland.
Why would I apply the "wayland fix patch"?
If I did then would the engine build at all on pre-wayland distros?
Probably not.

I want the engine running on un-touched systems sitting in a closet from 2009,2011, (maybe) 1997.
This is why I make sure to pay attention to the "ISO C90 not followed" warnings and fix them when they occur.

But I don't much care for your systems.
I don't want more players.
Why do I need more enemies?
Faggots who oppose me marrying cute young girls?
Why would I want to benifit them.

It is the responsibility of the mac user to get the engine running on mac if he likes mac.
Same with other faggot OSs.

>>33
How do I benifit?

You aren't paying me so why should I care?
It runs on my machines and already benifits me in that way.
But what would I benifit by your machine working?

You, a Zoomer dipshit, think I "owe" you to do the work to make it work on your machine.
As if I broke something.
But it worked on machines before yours. So obviously it is not me who broke things.
But you.

And even if I did break things; again: what would my incentive be to make it work for you?

>>33
>No, I don't think I will.

>>33
When a pattern of programming works for 40 consequtive years,
and then you change something, and your mouse is spinning around
and you then claim all the other programmers were wrong for 40 years;
that's your malicious action.

The point is to make the basis of the system seem like a foundation of sand:
to make the old programmers "go crazy" and "question themselves" and ultimatily wash their hands of the situation.

As you mock them and berate them for "not keeping up with the times"

We could prosecute you under the 1990s computer crimes statutes for your malicious actions; had they not been desired by the powers that be.

We can also sue you under various business interference torts, contractual torts, common law fraud.

And you'll just mock me for saying that
>U DIDNT DO ANYTING ABOUT GRSECURITY
Yea: I read your mind Rika.

I contacted the rightsholders regarding Grsecurity many years ago. I was told they'd eventually sue them.
I'm not one with standing to sue Grsecurity.
>HUH BUT THEN WHY DIDN"T THEY HUH!!!
Because it would cost 1 million dollars in current USD to go after Grsecurity in federal court, all told. And they do not have 1 million dollars to throw away.

Regarding suing you Zoomer fucks for infiltration and undermining:
We could also just kill you dead.