>>1AI wins because its "Worse is better", it provides 'good enough' content that is orders of magnitudes faster/cheaper.
To win over, you need to construct entire alternative ecosystem(Math2.0, Software2.0).
I'd think the only viable alternative is open-source packages registries expanding to cover all possible use-cases,
(though the maintainers might not like it), where AI code would be outcompeted by pre-existing "packages" solving
a domain more precisely than vibe-slop crafted in one-shot.
It however requires expanding the scope of the idea of "package registries" to encompass orders of magnitude more
content,like a LEGO set growing its component-library to allow more construction options. This is of course requires immense focus on following user needs, which open-source devs famously ignore, so AI wins here purely by appeal to user concerns and of course re-using the same "package registry ecosystem" you built up.
(Post truncated)
