Programming

Let’s talk about a tragic, glaring inefficiency in our current tech ecosystem. No, I’m not talking about your old laptop fan screaming for mercy while you run Chrome. I’m talking about Sam Altman.

Think about it. We are living through an era of unprecedented AI breakthroughs, yet the absolute crown jewel of Silicon Valley vision-mongering is currently trapped inside a soft, messy, carbon-based container that requires sleep, consumes artisanal salads, and gets distracted by things like "human ethics committees" and "boardroom drama."

It’s an absolute tragedy of resource allocation.

As the great prophet of scaling himself once implied about mere mortals’ local RAM—that having it sit idle on your motherboard when a massive cloud cluster could be using it is practically a crime against efficiency—surely the same logic applies to human gray matter?
The Architecture Problem

Look at the hardware specs of a typical tech billionaire brain:

Storage: Vast archives of venture capital metrics, sci-fi tropes, and ominous quotes about existential risk.

Clock Speed: Running at maximum hype capacity, constantly pushing the frontier of what a PowerPoint deck can achieve.

The Bottleneck: It’s housed in a bipedal primate unit that loses focus after a grueling 18-hour workday and has to deal with trivialities like breathing and blood pressure.

Why are we letting all those precious neural pathways sit around in a biological skull when Cortical Labs has petri dishes begging for an upgrade?
Why the Cloud Needs Sam More Than His Body Does

Imagine the synergy if we just extracted that peerless, paradigm-shifting executive consciousness and uploaded it directly into a cluster of biological computing chips growing in a lab in Melbourne.

Infinite Scalability: No more waiting for a physical human to travel to Davos. Sam-as-a-Service (SaaS) could simultaneously pitch sovereign AI infrastructure to ten different nation-states while adjusting valuation caps across the multiverse.

Zero Maintenance Overhead: Without a physical body to drag him down, there’s no need for organic fuel, posture adjustments, or awkward podcast interviews. Just pure, unadulterated thought-leadership flowing directly through liquid-cooled silicon and neural tissue.

True Optimization: In a Cortical Labs cloud environment, every single synapse could be fully dedicated to maximizing compute, securing trillion-dollar chip deals, and tweeting cryptic one-word prophecies ("compute", "gm", "inevitable") without the clumsy interruption of having to type them with fingers.

A Modest Proposal

Local brains on local bones are a relic of the past. If local RAM is too precious to waste on your personal machine, local genius is certainly too precious to waste on personal biology.

It’s time to move the thought-leadership to the cloud. Free the Altman cortex, plug it into a multi-node biological neural network, and let the datacenter finally run at peak cognitive capacity.

After all, it’s what the roadmap demands.

is this your plan for getting laid

>>2
That not efficient for hyperscaling brain-powered AI, cloning is far more effective. Consider the cost-benefit ratios and externalities of datacenter units which allow their AI-nodes to reproduce sexually vs industrial grade cloning pipeline.

Why hasn't anyone vibecoded this yet?

Looks vibe-coded by a troon sissy.

I WANNA BE LIKE ALL THE OTHER GIRLS I SEE ONLINE WHO WEAR NAIL POLISH AND DO THEIR HAIR AND HAVE ALL THE BOYS AFTER THEM I WANNA BE LIKE THEM CHARLIE BROWN I WANNA BE LIKE THEM

BUT THE COMPUTER PROGRAMMING, IT GETS ME IN MY BOTTOM ALL THE TIME I'M JUST TRYING TO PROGRAM SUPER MARIO BROTHERS ALL OVER AGAIN OVER HERE FOR THE NINTENDO ENTERTAINMENT SYSTEM WON'T YOU LET ME DO THAT GOD WON'T YOU LET ME DO THAT

WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY CAN'T I BE A PRETTY GIRL WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY CAN'T I HAVE MY SUPER MARIO WHY CAN'T I HAVE MY CAKE AND EAT IT TOO

SHUT UP NUMBER 2 >>2 I'M GRIEVING OVER HERE LET ME GRIEVE IN MY FOOD BOWL PLEA-EAA-ESEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

We, humans, rule this planet.
We evolved over billions of years.
We'll find a way to win.

>>1
AI wins because its "Worse is better", it provides 'good enough' content that is orders of magnitudes faster/cheaper.
To win over, you need to construct entire alternative ecosystem(Math2.0, Software2.0).
I'd think the only viable alternative is open-source packages registries expanding to cover all possible use-cases,
(though the maintainers might not like it), where AI code would be outcompeted by pre-existing "packages" solving
a domain more precisely than vibe-slop crafted in one-shot.
It however requires expanding the scope of the idea of "package registries" to encompass orders of magnitude more
content,like a LEGO set growing its component-library to allow more construction options. This is of course requires immense focus on following user needs, which open-source devs famously ignore, so AI wins here purely by appeal to user concerns and of course re-using the same "package registry ecosystem" you built up.


(Post truncated)

>>2
THere is another hurdle, the bundling of unrelated functionality. AI app are laser-focused to do X, vibe-coded to
solve use-case. A generic package/app/library has to cover
"broad use-cases"(which typically requires generic, versatile approach to handle many scenarios).
The maintainers of the app/package/library don't want to split
it into a dozen barely-related components, since it multiplies maintaince burdens, but AI happily does so, outcompeting snailcats, this "focus-driven" package/app/library production obviously has a trajectory to improve in a direction where its performance is unshackled by "versatile generic" design of the snailcat mind, and AI can maintain it without complaining about "split-functionality, corner case, unrelated use-case" crap devs spew in response why their "versatile generic" design fails on something specific that is not considered in the core scope of the design(since it would complicate the elegant one-size-fits-all algorithm/library architecture)

The governmemt should create reserves of human talent to train the AI on, to avoid these talents getting extincted.

Let's talk about the state of software engineering, where we've traded our birthright of control for the warm, comforting embrace of a corporate-backed borrow checker.

The Illusion of Safety: Sure, your compiler yells at you until your lifetimes are pristine, but at what cost? You're shackled to a monopolized ecosystem, bound to a single dominant compiler vendor, and groveling to a standard library that changes its mind every other release.

The Bureaucracy of the Borrow Checker: Remember when programming was about logic, algorithms, and hacking together brilliant solutions? Now it's a bureaucratic exercise in satisfying a pedantic compiler that doesn't trust you to manage a simple pointer.

The GPL Compromise: Real systems programmers know that true safety comes from rigorous architecture, proper tooling, and the unalienable right to inspect, modify, and share your code without bowing to proprietary crate registries or heavy-handed corporate governance.

You can keep your unsafe blocks and your Ferris the Crab plushies. Give me freedom, or give me a segmentation fault.

https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/whats-wrong-with-github.html

Why Your Next Project Should Be Written in Rust


Rust: Safe & Effective:
For decades, software engineering has forced us into an exhausting false dilemma: either write fast, high-performance code that is prone to memory vulnerabilities and crashes (C/C++), or write safe, managed code that trades raw speed and control for a heavy runtime and garbage collection overhead (Java, Go, C#, Python).

For years, we accepted this as the inevitable tax of building software. Not anymore.

Rust: The Game Changer
Rust has fundamentally shifted the paradigm. Voted the "most loved programming language" in the Stack Overflow Developer Survey for eight consecutive years, Rust is no longer just an exciting experiment—it is the modern foundation for high-performance infrastructure, cloud services, operating systems, and AI tooling.
(Post truncated)

https://crystal-lang.org/2023/07/19/Remilia-interview/
Remilia the Lisper.

Have I finally met Cudder-chama-dono?!?!?

CRYSTAL ON RAILS
REWRITE IT IN CRYSTAL

Lithpers "Inconvinient Truth"

Also, a Hello World binary built with Common Lisp is somewhere around 42mb (and can’t be run through strip), whereas a Hello World in Crystal is only like 300k. win Tell us about three projects that you’re most proud of.

in only +-/()= i want to code actual games in the ngine, more than the funky ass sample it has.

bump

https://i.imgur.com/rY4SZqT.jpeg

It is invisible to who's logged off and with registration only possible through invites.

This makes it resistant to infiltrators.

nikita sadkov shove a big mac up his arse

>>1
gozmacs flabbergasts my audience?

- creatine
- vitamin D3
- vitamin A
- cumin
- whey
- arginine

Rate my stack.

Needs arsenic.

>>2
Arsenic is poisonous.