Feminism destroying America

You've finally settled down with a nice white wife and have a daughter, a beautiful little angel that even looks like you. After you've devoted yourself to her and raise her well, in this society she will probably…

-want to dress like a cumslut by the time she is 9 or earlier and hate you when you don't buy her revealing clothes that all the cool girls wear

-act like a self entitled brat and ignore you while she is texting on her smartphone that she seems to carry around all fucking day

-go to her first party by 12/13 where she will drink shots and hook up with a black guy, maybe even give a guy a blowjob if she is an early bloomer

-have a facebook/social media profile where she will have fappable pics that basement dwellers will save to their hard drives and will fap to them or even post them on Primejailbait. Facebook is also where she and her friends will talk to guys you don't know and plan to meet up with them at Jamal's party (you won't know about the party though, she will tell you she is "just going out to watch a movie and stay the night at Rebecca's house") and before she leaves she will kiss you on your balding head with the same lips that will be wrapped around Tyrone's throbbing cock later that night. "Bye daddy, I love you".

Even if she does skip the tween rebellion phase, she will definitely be doing this sort of shit in high school, there will be a day when the first nigger buck takes her virginity, spoiling her virgin pussy with his potent seed. She might not go whoring around every weekend, but she will probably still have a melanin enriched inamorato that will stick his BBC in her mouth every night while she licks and sucks it till he blows his load in your little princess's gloss rimmed mouth.

The feminists have brainwashed young girls into believing the only way to liberation is to have 12 black dicks inside of her.

Stop putting my daughter in your nigger fantasies.

Now THIS is cuckposting.

This is why we need Islam!

Marijuana MUST be legalized!

ised

I make $75K/year and I'm only three years out of college. I can afford to put my lolis into private school.

That's what you get when you destroy culture. America is literally the land of barbarians, where brainless sports brutes are kings and get all the pussy while intelligence or honesty are considered sin.

Also OP's brain has been destroyed by porn industry propagand. Black dicks aren't any bigger on average than white dicks. And the chances of a slut teenager sucking big white dick is no less than a black dick. Just watch all those college orgy videos on the internet - the dicks are mostly white.
OP is right about one thing, though: feminism has destroyed the White values of chastity and replaced it with encouragement of total whoring. But that is the way all failing, degenerating First-world societies go. Ancient Rome too was full of whoring and debauchery right before the fall. You've just got to realize that your society has passed its prime and is getting ready for a meltdown and a crash. It's just... time, man. Empires rise and fall without exception.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zr162OZ2Z0w

Check em

>>1

want to dress like a cumslut by the time she is 9 or earlier and hate you when you don't buy her revealing clothes that all the cool girls wear

If I can't logically convince her not to dress that way, then by all rights she should be able to dress that way, provided it doesn't violate any school dress codes or anything. Telling your children not to do something "because I say so" is bad parenting, it encourages children to do what you say ONLY because you have power over them, rather than being able to understand the logical reasons for those things.

-act like a self entitled brat and ignore you while she is texting on her smartphone that she seems to carry around all fucking day

Again, behavior doesn't arise in a vacuum. If I fail to teach her good manners, then I have no one to blame but myself. It's not like modern society "corrupts" people, it's just another one of many influences that have always been there.

-go to her first party by 12/13 where she will drink shots and hook up with a black guy, maybe even give a guy a blowjob if she is an early bloomer
-have a facebook/social media profile where she will have fappable pics that basement dwellers will save to their hard drives and will fap to them or even post them on Primejailbait. Facebook is also where she and her friends will talk to guys you don't know and plan to meet up with them at Jamal's party (you won't know about the party though, she will tell you she is "just going out to watch a movie and stay the night at Rebecca's house") and before she leaves she will kiss you on your balding head with the same lips that will be wrapped around Tyrone's throbbing cock later that night. "Bye daddy, I love you".
Even if she does skip the tween rebellion phase, she will definitely be doing this sort of shit in high school, there will be a day when the first nigger buck takes her virginity, spoiling her virgin pussy with his potent seed. She might not go whoring around every weekend, but she will probably still have a melanin enriched inamorato that will stick his BBC in her mouth every night while she licks and sucks it till he blows his load in your little princess's gloss rimmed mouth.
The feminists have brainwashed young girls into believing the only way to liberation is to have 12 black dicks inside of her.

Why do you keep going on about black people? Are you racist or something? People shouldn't be having sex in their early teens, but that's just because of personal health/safety reasons, not because of anything to do with black people. You make it sound like you'd be perfectly okay with 12 year olds having sex as long as it was with white guys.

>>12
Tbh fam smh

>>12
People don't act logically or rationally all the time. Have you heard of habits? Telling your children to do something because you said so is perfectly good parenting that can do a child much good.

It's not like modern society "corrupts" people

Except that's what it does.

Why do you keep going on about black people?

Why would he not keep going on about black people? These are terrible times when white people are being driven to extinction, not in the least through miscegenation with black, Asian and other people. In particular, negroes are over-represented in school and college sports teams, which presents a further danger of naive white girls getting defiled. Protecting white daughters from liaisons with black people is a perfectly valid concern.

You're daughter is not your property. She is not a computer, you can program to do what you want.

>>15
The fact that you can't even spell "your" or avoid putting down unnecessary commas shows that your parents obviously didn't do their jobs.
Of course children are not programmable computers. For example, we cannot force a child into a profession she doesn't like. However, it is every parent's responsibility to teach a child the minimum standards of conduct, such as being responsible about sex and the race's procreation.

>>16
Methinks one whom writes with such terrible grammar should not cast a stone at others.

>>15

She is not a computer, you can program to do what you want.

These are contradictory statements.

>>16

we cannot force a child into a profession she doesn't like.

actually, you can, if child has no choice. In middle ages everyone was either a peasant, a warrior, a lord or a Jew.

>>19
In the Middle Ages, there was basically no choice, no social mobility.

>>20
So keep your little girl in middle ages. Better yet, convert to islam and move to muslim country.

>>21
Why move when you can have it delivered?

>>22
I don't know.

>>14

People don't act logically or rationally all the time. Have you heard of habits? Telling your children to do something because you said so is perfectly good parenting that can do a child much good.

Sure, but it should be a last resort, only used if the child refuses to accept the logical reasoning. The job of the parent is not to control the child, but to teach the child how to take care of themselves. Making arbitrary (from the child's PoV) rules about what they can or can't do will either make them resent you and become rebellious, or alternatively make them depend on authority and be unable to think for themselves.

It's not like modern society "corrupts" people

Except that's what it does.

Could you elaborate on this point?

Why would he not keep going on about black people? These are terrible times when white people are being driven to extinction, not in the least through miscegenation with black, Asian and other people. In particular, negroes are over-represented in school and college sports teams, which presents a further danger of naive white girls getting defiled. Protecting white daughters from liaisons with black people is a perfectly valid concern.

Black people going around and actually killing white people, denying them access to food, shelter etc, that would be a legitimate thing to worry about. But that's not really happening outside the inner cities, and even then I suspect it's exaggerated a great deal. If your daughter wants to date a black guy, that's her decision. If you really loved your children, you would respect their choices even if they go against your "racialist" ideology.

>>18
I think they mean "she is not a computer that you can program to do what you want".

>>19
But we don't live in the middle ages, so it's not really relevant to raising children in the modern world.

>>24

If your daughter wants to date a black guy, that's her decision. If you really loved your children, you would respect their choices even if they go against your "racialist" ideology.

I'm not the Nazi, but this is ridiculous. If my children get addicted to crack and start sucking off AIDS-ridden dealers to get it, I'm not going to fucking approve, and if you say you would, then you are a fool and should never have children. Why should stupid decisions be respected? Do we have to respect the wishes of suicidal loved ones and let them walk in front of a bus if we "truly love them"? Is it wrong to try and raise happy children who won't commit suicide because it robs them of a choice you would have been bound to respect later?

If you believe that something is truly right and just, in a Nicomachean sense, then it is wrong to not try to force it on others. Unless you want to swim into relativism, there is no escaping the necessity of judgementalness on some level. Further, it is ridiculous to suggest that people should not raise their children by their own principles and beliefs. There is no objectively correct set of values, and yours is no more provable or divinely ordained than the Nazis is, so you don't get to force yours down his kids throats any more than he should get to yours.

>>25
The difference is that there is clear, objective evidence that hard drugs are bad for you, whereas refusing to let them date black people is only motivated by racism.

>>26
There is clear, objective evidence that white people are going extinct, making prevention of miscegenation a clear, objective good thing.

>>24

only used if the child refuses to accept the logical reasoning

haha

>>27
Miscegenation works both ways, it dilutes both races, so it contributes to the "extinction" of whites as much as blacks. The only case in which it wouldn't would be if black genes are more likely to be inherited than white ones, which doesn't really make sense. And the "white people going extinct" narrative is built on taking a small set of datapoints and assuming the trend will continue indefinitely, which almost never happens in reality. It's the equivalent of saying "my car can go from zero to sixty in six seconds, therefore it will reach 7200 mph after two minutes of acceleration."

you don't get to force yours down his kids throats any more than he should get to yours.

But that's my fetish.

>>29
No, it doesn't. White genes are recessive, so the child inherits the black phenotype. Just look at Barack Obama. 99% of people consider him black even though his mother was Irish. This is the great lie about "equality" and "diversity": there is no equality on the biological level, no evenness, only destruction of the white race until there are no blue-eyed, blond people left.

>>29
Besides, black birthrates are sky-high compared to white birth-rates which are below replacement level. So any black-white couple is a loss for the white race but not for the black.

>>29

is built on taking a small set of datapoints and assuming the trend will continue indefinitely, which almost never happens in reality

Tell that to the Native Americans, tell that to the Inuit. Wonder why many of them want to live in reservations? Because they were once part of a trend that continued a wee bit too long.
Now, you're right that trends don't go on indefinitely, and I have confidence that the white race will come to its senses eventually, and rejuvenate itself. But social trends aren't handed to us from some gods, they are broken by a change of thinking. Until more white people start seeing themselves as the minority going extinct, and remember their duty of procreation, and start bringing up their children in the spirit of racial pride and unity, the trend will not change one bit.

>>32
This is why we need more abortion funding.

>>31

White genes are recessive

[citation needed]

This is the great lie about "equality" and "diversity": there is no equality on the biological level, no evenness, only destruction of the white race until there are no blue-eyed, blond people left.

So white people are biologically inferior? That would imply the genetic fitness of the human race would increase if they went extinct. Why do you see an increase in genetic fitness to be a bad thing?

>>35

[citation needed]

GOTO wikipedia.

So white people are biologically inferior

Dominant and recessive alleles have nothing to do with being 'superior' or 'inferior'. Some genetic diseases are caused by dominant alleles, too (read under 'Dominant diseases'):
http://www.yourgenome.org/facts/what-are-single-gene-disorders

>>36

GOTO wikipedia.

A search for "white genes are recessive" didn't give any results on Wikipedia. All I got were some discussions on Stormfront etc.

Dominant and recessive alleles have nothing to do with being 'superior' or 'inferior'. Some genetic diseases are caused by dominant alleles, too (read under 'Dominant diseases'):

Yes, I get that dominant and recessive aren't about superior/inferior, but BY DEFINITION if a trait has a pattern of dying out, it's inferior. That's how natural selection WORKS. And you yourself said that there is no equality on the biological level, even admitting that white people are being destroyed through natural selection. In what universe is that NOT a sign of biological inferiority?

>>24

But that's not really happening outside the inner cities, and even then I suspect it's exaggerated a great deal.

Maybe you should visit and find out.

>>37
There is no inferior and superior in natural selection, ad it is not a consciously directed process that can assign value to certain properties over others to make a nice poset for comparisons. Things are what they are. The genes that might make fish as smart as humans could just end up getting those fish killed when they were daydreaming about how to breach the surface and didn't pay attention to the whale swallowing them up. That doesn't mean those genes were inferior, just that they did not lead to a viable organism at this time. It may work fine fifty generations in the future even.

>>39
Superior and inferior doesn't imply any sort of "consciously directed process", its just about what works best for the given circumstances. And, in terms of natural selection, it doesn't matter if traits are beneficial in some OTHER circumstance, what matters is whether they're beneficial or harmful in the current circumstances. If white people are dying out, it's because they are genetically unfit for their current environment.

>>40
Exactly, your melatonins are insufficient because climate change.

>>41
Melatonin is an over-the-counter sleep aid medicine and dream enhancer, buddy. Melanin is what makes skin dark.

check em

>>43
Check what?

>>41,42
You can't make this shit up.

>>45
With extra fluoride, anything is possible!

>>46
With extra fluoride, anything is possible?

>>47
I didn't know they were putting fluoride in the chemtrails?

>>48
Water fluoridation. Google it.

Google it.

I see they got you too.

>>27
It's strange to hear about the white race going extinct when it is so much more populous and distributed than e.g. circa 400 AD. Think about it:

1) not a single white person in all of North America (now there are hundreds of millions)
2) not a single white person in all of South America (now there are millions)
3) not a single white person in all of Australia and New Zealand (now there are millions)
4) precious few white people in Asian-dominated Siberia (now there are millions)
5) even Europe, the home of the white race, is overrun by asiatic hordes (Huns, Avars, Sarmatians etc) who are murdering, pillaging and raping white women
6) the white (Roman) empire is crumbling

And you think it's bad now? Compared to 400 AD, the white race is just cruising, man, so chill out.

>>48
I'm not sure if you knew or not.

White people must colonize the moon.

White people must colorize the moon.

colonize my colon

This literally describes my useless slut of a sister though she also fucks around with empanadas and whites as well. In fact, she's living with a dindu in her bedroom right now. Just in case anyone thought that OP's post was satire or something, I'm actually living in this hell.

They're annoying but you're way over-hyping it.

>>57
No he's not.

Fuck off, liberal piece of shit.

>>58
No, you are.

>>56
Use the chance to fuck her.

>>60-kun is right, >>56-chan. It is your duty to rape your sister, for all of us.

>>60-61
Nope, I'm not a desperate degenerate. Also, tfw no qt 3.14 right-wing Trump-supporting gf who'll join me in the militia death squad sweeping away all the filth to Make America Great Again.

>>62

I'm not a desperate degenerate

Yes you are! If you weren't, you wouldn't be here. Now either rape and cannibalize your sister, or we will rape and cannibalize you

Feminism gave women the freedom to choose the men they are actually attracted to. You can complain pointlessly about them not choosing you just like a shitty hot dog vendor would complain about no customers because he has rat turds in his hot dogs. It's the free market. If you want a collectivist distribution of women through preventing them from working (enforcing marriage), then have some logical consistency and embrace other collectivist ideals.

>>64
My point exactly. Women love strong athletic black men with huge dicks.

And OP is a fat anime fanboy with a laughable willy.

>>65

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3a8NEKBaCo

"i am Black and have only dated white girls there..although i have dated Portuguese and an Arab as well."

lel

>>66
Stupid/drunk dipshits whose experience with black dicks is limited to interracial porn. If they'd ever gotten on some action with a real black, they would see that blacks actually have mediocre dicks.

https://encyclopediadramatica.se/The_Great_Black_Dick_Hoax

>>65
Problem is, 99% of "strong athletic black men with huge dicks" exist only in your imagination.

In the real life, women love White Nordic men:

He says many requests come in from women who ask for his hand in marriage or just his Norwegian genes.

"They want to marry me or ask me to make them pregnant," the 30-year-old said.

http://www.thelocal.no/20160429/norway-viking-conquers-instagram

>>69
encyclopedia dramatica is not a credible source, and nor is some anecdotal blog post the foundation of a credible argument

>>67
Hello Black. This seems a bit racist. Why don't you date girls of other races? Are you perhaps a white supremacist?

You sound mad as hell and like you have a butt that is paining you like crazy.

>>72
Someone is upset about something, and that means they are wrong. Flawless logic.

>>73

H-he's w-wrong because he called me butthurt XDD

flawless logic.

>>73-74
You're both creating this wrongness strawman out of nowhere. Flawed logic.

>>70
They've got lots of proof you giant faggot. If blacks really all had big dicks then black porn actors wouldn't need giant prosthetic rubber peckers.

Who the fuck watches Western porn anyway?

I am completely willing to admit that blacks have larger dicks. They have so little to be proud of. They long ago choose the evolutionary path brutishness and animalism, gaining large sexual measures and physical strength and swiftness at the expense of intellect.

>>77
Old people. Stupid people. Normies.

>>78
You're a victim of myths and wrong on both counts.
A large dick isn't really an evolutionary advantage, rather a liability because a large appendage is more liable to be damaged. It's stupid to have a sperm delivery tube that's as large as a hip and takes a quarter of the body's blood to get erect. The female vagina is only sensitive for a couple of inches of depth. If anything, they can only feel the difference between a thin dick and a thick dick. So even if there were an evolutionary mechanism where black women were impregnated only by the most sexually pleasing men, blacks would have uber-thick schlongs not long ones.
Besides, perpetrators of the "big black cock" myth can't explain why other peoples living in equatorial jungle regions like South Americans or Hindus or Tamils don't have larger dicks too.

More prooflinks:
http://x.imagefapusercontent.com/u/AfricanCocks/5828462/983787308/936_1000.jpg
http://fappingclub.com/v2qtN

As for the second part,

They long ago choose the evolutionary path brutishness and animalism

this is wrong because the typical Sub-Saharan habitats are described primarily by plentifulness and ease of survival. In the North, people need clothes not to die of hypothermia, they have to build intricate houses of stone or wood which requires lots of tools and strength, they need to sow enough seeds in a limited time cause otherwise they won't last through the winter etc. In Africa, you can go aroung naked, make a hut out of leaves, and find food any day because there's fruit everywhere and tons of pigs running around. So if Africans come across as unintelligent and animal-like, it's because they didn't have much of a stimulus to develop anything. They aren't brutish, they're simply evolutionary lazy because there was so little pressure on them.

Also the most numerous and densely-populated ethnic groups are Chinese and Indians who have notoriously small dicks. So a big dick is anything but an evolutionary advantage.

>>79
You're a victim of thinking that evolution has a goal. Things evolve because genes spread, and genes spread through reproduction. Your simplistic explanation fails to explain, for example, peacock feathers or shiny decorative scales on fish, which attract predators to eat them. Nigger women lust after big dicks, so big dicks evolve. The only reason why this would work is a lack of clothing. For hundreds of years, blacks outside of Africa have not been allowed to select for large dicks, they have been selected for the attributes conducive to being good farm equipment.

this is wrong because the typical Sub-Saharan habitats are described primarily by plentifulness and ease of survival. In the North, people need clothes not to die of hypothermia, they have to build intricate houses of stone or wood which requires lots of tools and strength, they need to sow enough seeds in a limited time cause otherwise they won't last through the winter etc. In Africa, you can go aroung naked, make a hut out of leaves, and find food any day because there's fruit everywhere and tons of pigs running around. So if Africans come across as unintelligent and animal-like, it's because they didn't have much of a stimulus to develop anything. They aren't brutish, they're simply evolutionary lazy because there was so little pressure on them.

This is correct, but I wasn't talking about Africans in general, I was talking about niggers. The original inhabitants of northern Africa were not black. They were either white or of Middle Eastern decent. Blacks didn't breach the desert until Egypt started the routes of passage that would eventually cause their downfall. Humans left the sub-Saharan part of the continent far before the current races existed, as evidenced by the Aborigines and other various subhumans far below black Africans. It was from there that the other races evolved.

>>80
Evolution is a function of time. If a function converges to some precise state, then that state could be defined as its goal. On the other hand, a program may have goal, but don't converge to it in practice, due to the deficiencies in algorithms or absence of resources employed to reach that goal.

In other words, a negro with large penis will converge to the state of finding a white female to copulate with, even if he has no such explicit goal. But you will not reach your explicit goal of having sex with a girl. Enjoy your little asian dick and consider a sexchange. Then you will at least have sex with males.

>>82
Evolution is a function of many variables, including some random ones. The dimensionality is too high in the real world to talk about a function converging on any predicable point. There are attractors at points that give an advantage in almost all cases, such as flight, which has evolved several times, or vision, which has evolved once in vertebrates and who-knows-how-many times in insects. That said, the applicability of an organism to it's environment is an indirect function of fitness, which is constantly changing and is unstable. General trends can be speculated on, particularly retroactively, and it can be guided to an extent (ie, domestication of animals), but it is as unpredictable on an individual level as a individual person is.

>>78
It's not about what you're "willing to accept". It's about this thing called reality where black people's average penis length is approximately the same as white people's.

>>81
What you're saying is that supposedly evolution of cock size in Africans was guided by culture/aesthetics, but this conjecture has at least two glaring faults:
1) Culture and aesthetics wildly differ between different tribes: some like eroded teeth, some extremely fat women, some find deformed skulls beautiful etc. Thus there's no reason to believe that all Africal women would "lust after big dicks".
2) What about other rainforest people like South Americans and peoples of India? Why don't they have big dicks if they've been running around naked too?

For hundreds of years, blacks outside of Africa have not been allowed to select for large dicks

That's not a timeframe of importance when it comes to evolution. You would do better to suggest that initially the black slaves were not chosen for big dicks, not that they evolved small dicks in America. But weren't you saying that American blacks have big dicks, though? Did you get confused?

Anyway, it's pretty pointless to discuss supposed large size of black dicks since objective scientific data doesn't support it. Fuck, even back at a school biology lesson I've been told that average cock size is pretty much the same in all men. What the fuck is wrong with people who would rather believe lame porn industry myths than science and common sense? Do you idiots also believe that real-life sex is always as exciting as the pornos with all the huge tits, big dicks, moans and squirting? Fucking gullible wankers.