>>41Since the advent of structured scientific inquiry combined with a high technology required to enact its methods, the evidence for atoms became quickly conclusive. Where was ALL rational and reasoned discourse 1000 years ago? That's right, it was mired in religious fucking NONSENSE.
This "god" has been claimed for millennia, and I'm being generous since there have been multiple incarnations of this thing so it's a bit specious to claim singularity. In all those thousands of years, where's the fucking EVIDENCE? There's NONE. You know a thing that's searched for, over thousands of years and various investigatory ecologies? They call it "DOESN'T FUCKING EXIST", chum. The ultimate investigator, science, hasn't found this "god" and given the alleged characteristics of this "god", science should have found it. Hence it just doesn't fucking exist.
WAKE UP.P.S. Once again, if anyone's going to make any claims for the existence for this "god", "heaven" and "hell", then they could have ONLY detected these things, right? Why make a claim for something existing when you have no evidence for it? So, I'm STILL WAITING for the evidence to back up
>>39's claims. Put up the evidence, chum!