Name: b.u.o.i.s. 2014-04-26 15:19
Hi,
I am reliant on BBS (in this case /prog/) to keep in touch with others; a kind of addiction. I need Internet (and in this case spaming the BBS with nonsense) to function. My apologies for in the case of defining this activity as 'shitposting.' Similarly to, for example, using aim/icq/msn/yahoo/skype/etc, or myspace/facebook/google+/etc, (which I no longer use), without access to such platforms or mediums, I overwhelmingly feel as if my access to others has been cut off and it can be quite overwhelming to be prevented to have access to others through such environments.
I completely understand the root cause for the ban was specific to high volume posting, and that particular effort that triggered the ban has and will be ceased so as to prevent further need to establish permanency of deletion/banning to prevent that continued abusive practice. However, in terms of expanding that abusive practice to account for any and all practices involving or making use of a connection, seems a bit much. I understand how it has been established as a standardized procedure within your organization, however, since you asked for me to explain myself, it seems a bit much.
My effort was not continuously malicious in which I had reconnected on several occasions to continue pursuing the malicious or abusive practice of making memes, which was the cause for triggering the ban. Therefore, since my continued usage was not malicious, again, disregarding the established policy in which it is described as 'shitposting', I see how no abusiveness or maliciousness had resulted. I think this type of effort is similar to police, military and other militia in which once a person is a criminal or abusive, they are always criminal or abusive. I don't think that my efforts or intentions of 'ban evasion' were to continue the abusive practices, but instead, to have access to the community in which I interact with regularly for other purposes (e.g. socialization, SICP, etc).
l33test gr8est,
b.u.o.i.s.
I am reliant on BBS (in this case /prog/) to keep in touch with others; a kind of addiction. I need Internet (and in this case spaming the BBS with nonsense) to function. My apologies for in the case of defining this activity as 'shitposting.' Similarly to, for example, using aim/icq/msn/yahoo/skype/etc, or myspace/facebook/google+/etc, (which I no longer use), without access to such platforms or mediums, I overwhelmingly feel as if my access to others has been cut off and it can be quite overwhelming to be prevented to have access to others through such environments.
I completely understand the root cause for the ban was specific to high volume posting, and that particular effort that triggered the ban has and will be ceased so as to prevent further need to establish permanency of deletion/banning to prevent that continued abusive practice. However, in terms of expanding that abusive practice to account for any and all practices involving or making use of a connection, seems a bit much. I understand how it has been established as a standardized procedure within your organization, however, since you asked for me to explain myself, it seems a bit much.
My effort was not continuously malicious in which I had reconnected on several occasions to continue pursuing the malicious or abusive practice of making memes, which was the cause for triggering the ban. Therefore, since my continued usage was not malicious, again, disregarding the established policy in which it is described as 'shitposting', I see how no abusiveness or maliciousness had resulted. I think this type of effort is similar to police, military and other militia in which once a person is a criminal or abusive, they are always criminal or abusive. I don't think that my efforts or intentions of 'ban evasion' were to continue the abusive practices, but instead, to have access to the community in which I interact with regularly for other purposes (e.g. socialization, SICP, etc).
l33test gr8est,
b.u.o.i.s.