!!! WARNING: COMPUTER SCIENCE IS NOT A REAL SCIENCE. !!!
Name:
Anonymous2013-09-04 17:58
Computer ``Science'' is only a science in the way that ``political science'', ``library science'', ``military science'', and ``environmental science'' are ``science''. Its only worth in our universe is to occupy the time and efforts of people too ignorant to have the ability to partake in real science, such as mathematics.
science is for the lowly labrats who can only believe what they see with their own eyes and refuse to use their minds. They don't even believe their minds exist.
>>8 I can't speak of the rest, but the floating point processor should be obvious. You see the precision errors every day in the form of quantum phenomenon.
>>15 There is no science in computation. Computation is a matter of maths, it is not a matter of the scientific method.
Name:
Anonymous2013-10-06 21:29
>>19 Because he's one hell of a self-stuck smug faggot who thinks he's superior for calling out on other's religion. Just like every atheist out there.
Yes, this is a textbook case of "i hate all X and I'm the only X in the world who's right", but hell, can't you be an atheist and keep it to yourself? I'm sure nobody cares about my opinions, so why try to force them a la Reddit?
Yes, this is a textbook case of "i hate all X and I'm the only X in the world who's right", but hell, can't you be an atheist and keep it to yourself? I'm sure nobody cares about my opinions, so why try to force them a la Reddit?
He's not actively shoving his shit down other people's throats (as religious persons often do), and it's not like he's hijacking debates and stuff to advance his agenda. He sounds like a professional master debater to me.
>>20 The scientific method is a trivial overrated thing. it requires no real intelligence to comprehend and use correctly. Pure math is superior just because of the amount of intelligence it requires. Us mathematicians will deal with more higher things while you lowly lab rats can deal with figuring out if men shit larger shits than women.
Basically, the scientific method is "I’ll only believe it if I can see and touch it because my mind is comparable to that of a child" while pure mathematics is "I don't believe or trust that my mind is capable of discovering objective immaterial reality, I know it is capable because I'm a free sentient agent (and a genius one at that) with a divinely inspired intellect and imagination".
Shit, you guys are going to be so sorry if you don't jump up now.. Just wait until that 1.5 billion dollar data centre opens up, you'll be beaten into submission by a bunch of guys with every last detail of your lives... And you can't even handle the jests of a 'retard'
Admin-sama, I'd say let him post and ignore him. He seems to be confined to this thread and should be harmless. If for some reason it gets worse, we'll have to wait for DistBB to solve this problem.
Science is useless shit. The only thing science has achieved is allow the sweaty monkeys to pollute and stink up the whole Earth while inventing new ways to kill and torture every living thing.
Name:
Anonymous2014-05-29 5:23
In my dictionary, the preferred definition of science involves discovering properties of the natural world. Engineering involves the application of those properties to solve practical problems. By these definitions we are neither scientists nor engineers. The principal objects of our study are man-made, not natural. -- William Allan Wulf, teacher of Guy Steele and the inventor of the BLISS programming language
The whole idea of religion is from the beginning a government project. Bible basically says "you are a slave, so obey your master"
Name:
Anonymous2014-05-29 5:30
>>85 Define "natural". Superconducting magnets flying around don't happen in nature, but even a retard like you would admit that Meissner effect is an object of science.
Name:
Anonymous2014-05-29 5:32
>>86 No, that's only the Christian religion, because it was created by le Jews. The Judaic religion is far from a government project - instead, the government is a Judaic project.