If I had a crystal ball and told you that the next president (without telling you which one it was) was going to be the worst President in U.S. history with all kinds of failures of governance, impulsive decisions, and economic recession, which one do you think is more likely to meet that criteria?
I'm with her.
Name:
Anonymous2016-08-01 9:21
Trump is a pro-russian jerk. He will sell Ukraine to Putin.
Name:
Anonymous2016-08-01 9:43
>>3 And you have a problem with this why? USA is not the Ukraine's daddy, she has no responsibility to Ukraine. Either Ukraine learns to defend herself, or make herself worth defending, or simply accept her fate as a Russian state. Nobody should care either way. It's called natural selection and it's natural and beautiful.
Name:
Anonymous2016-08-01 10:14
The only sane choice is Jeb Bush. An upstanding conservative with a proven track record in Florida crocodile management. #JebWillFixIt #Jeb2016 #WriteInJeb
Name:
Anonymous2016-08-01 13:54
>>4 Of course I have problem with Trump. I'm ukrainian and don't to be dead or even worse Putin's slave in Gulag.
>>19 Hope they monitor anyone voting Trump, so you will lose your job and get replaced by cheap mexican or arab immigrant. The time of racist whites is over.
Name:
Anonymous2016-08-03 7:35
>>20 No, the time of leftist fascism and political correctness is over. The Racist Whites are about to experience a Renaissance and a baby boom after the socialist economies come crashing down and there's no more pensions or welfare for your beloved mexicans and arabs.
That is oxymoron. Ever seen feminists building concentration camps and gassing Jews?
Name:
Anonymous2016-08-03 8:19
>>22 Ever seen fascists gassing Jews? I haven't either. And concentration camps were invented in America and used widely by the British.
Name:
Anonymous2016-08-03 8:19
>>22 And if you think leftist fascism is an oxymoron, then you've got a lot to learn about XXth century history. Hint: Stalin.
Name:
Anonymous2016-08-03 8:29
>>24 Stalin was not liberal or capitalist at all. He was autocratic nationalist, like Hitler.
Name:
Anonymous2016-08-03 8:39
>>25 He was a communist and whenever someone disagreed with his leftist ideologies, he would order them killed or sent to labor camps. That makes him a leftist fascist.
autocratic
Just like the fascists.
nationalist
Stalin was not a nationalist, he encouraged ethnic mixing and worked to destroy the notion of nation. For example, he deported many Caucasian and Baltic peoples to Asia in order to weaken their nationalist sentiments. It wasn't until Stalin's death that these people got a chance to return to their ancestral lands.
He was a communist and whenever someone disagreed with his leftist ideologies, he would order them killed or sent to labor camps. That makes him a leftist fascist.
He also stopped or reversed all sorts of leftist reforms such as free love, free sodomy, worldwide revolution, and a whole shitload of other stuff.
Stalin was not a nationalist, he encouraged ethnic mixing and worked to destroy the notion of nation. For example, he deported many Caucasian and Baltic peoples to Asia in order to weaken their nationalist sentiments. It wasn't until Stalin's death that these people got a chance to return to their ancestral lands.
That doesn't matter at all. He was primarily focused on building a Soviet state with people loyal only to that state. Ethnic factionalism is the antithesis of that. You've been reading too much racist ``alt-right'' trash from a certain imagereddit and that has left you with poor opinion of what nationalism is.
>>27 Moreover, Stalin has reinstated christianity in Russia and had an idea of mixing socialism with christianity. CIA even had to liquidate some crazy pro-russian commie-christ priests in latin america to avoid communist revolution in there.
Name:
Anonymous2016-08-03 12:02
>>27-28 Stalin was the head of the Communist Party and considered himself and adherent of the communist ideology and Leninist. That makes him leftist whether you like it or not.
all sorts of leftist reforms such as free love
Those are liberal leftist reforms. Stalin was a fascist leftist, i.e. very non-liberal but leftist nonetheless. Just like on the right wing, there are liberals who want freedom and gun rights, and there are fascists who want a Fuehrer who will tell them when to wipe their ass.
He was primarily focused on building a Soviet state with people loyal only to that state
He was building an empire, not a nation-state. Empires seek to destoy nations and fuse them into a single entity, nationalists seek to break away from empires and split into separatist nation-states. The very defining quality of an empire is that it contains more than one nation. When the Soviet Empire fell, there were about 15 nation states forming out of it. That's nationalism, and a reversal of what Stalin was doing. Your concept of nationalism is wrong.
Stalin has reinstated christianity in Russia
This is obvious bullshit. What he did was install secret agents into the top ranks of the Church in order to control it. He only thought about Christianity as a way of controlling society to further his leftist goals. Today's leader of the Russian Communist Party is all Christianity-friendly too, he even says that there is the same moral code behind communism and Christianity.
Stalin was the head of the Communist Party and considered himself and adherent of the communist ideology and Leninist. That makes him leftist whether you like it or not.
His politics was not leftists. While Lenin was relatively soft with peasants, Stalin has turned peasants into serfs once again. Lenin has also introduced https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Economic_Policy which was dismantled by Stalin, who took everything people had and turned them into complete slaves at collective farms. That decision led to the fall of USSR, because slave labour is very inefficient.
He did not introguce the free market or make the means of production private property, instead he perpetrated class war (Red Terror) as well as forced industrialization, all according to Marx and Engels' teaching. Hence his politics were purely leftist. If militant communism isn't Left, then I don't know what is.
Now that's an example of a non-leftist policy. NEP was small-scale capitalism introduced as a forced measure. Stalin, on the other hand, ended this right-wing imperialist spree and forbade any entrepreneurship and speculation, showing he was more leftist than Lenin.
took everything people had and turned them into complete slaves at collective farms
Good morning! That's just communism for you. Mao Zedong did the same thing.
Name:
Anonymous2016-08-03 15:29
NEP was actually the basis for Chinese shift to market economy. They studied NEP and thought a controlled-capitalist phase would be necessary to build an industry while staying withing communism formally. They liked it so much, they converted parts of the country into special NEP-zones
Name:
Anonymous2016-08-03 15:37
>>31 So Ayn Rand was leftist or not? She obviously was pro-illegal immigration, pro-multiculturalism, because human resources are part of free market. Rand was also atheist and anti-christian, just like commies (see her video debating with priest). Yet she was against welfare and imperialist wars, which commies like so much.
Name:
Anonymous2016-08-03 16:52
>>24 Stalin was not fascist. Communism is opposed to fascism, even though they're both forms of totalitarian dictatorships.
people ... really, really like living in a society with adequately funded public services.
What people? Unemployed people? Because most hard working people would refuse to pay for the welfare of these parasites.
Name:
Anonymous2016-08-03 19:47
>>38 Why are you questioning me on something I didn't say? Because I don't know what people.
Name:
Anonymous2016-08-03 20:04
>>35 So? Everyone back then hated Jews. It's not like Hitler started it, he just took advantage of anti-Jewish sentiment and encouraged its growth until he was able to get away with stuff like the Holocaust.
Name:
Anonymous2016-08-03 22:47
The clear difference between Muslims and the corrupt and deviant Jews and Christians is that Muslims are not ashamed of abiding by the rules sent down from their Lord regarding war and enforcement of divine law. So if it were the Muslims, instead of the Crusaders, who had fought the Japanese and Vietnamese or invaded the lands of the Native Americans, there would have been no regrets in killing and enslaving those therein. And since those mujahidin would have done so bound by the Law, they would have been thorough and without some “politically correct” need to apologize years later. The Japanese, for example, would have been forcefully converted to Islam from their pagan ways – and if they stubbornly declined, perhaps another nuke would change their mind. The Vietnamese would likewise be offered Islam or beds of napalm. As for the Native Americans – after the slaughter of their men, those who would favor smallpox to surrendering to the Lord – then the Muslims would have taken their surviving women and children as slaves, raising the children as model Muslims and impregnating their women to produce a new generation of mujahidin. As for the treacherous Jews of Europe and elsewhere – those who would betray their covenant – then their post-pubescent males would face a slaughter that would make the Holocaust sound like a bedtime story, as their women would be made to serve their husbands’ and fathers’ killers.
Compared to Richard Nixon, who had to deal with 18.5 minutes of recorded conversations that were allegedly erased, Hillary outright erased half of all her emails. She is notorious for being secretive and refused to honor subpoenas from the State Department. Hillary never came forward about her private server until it was exposed that she had one. They would have dragged Nixon from the White House and imprisoned him if he had said screw you and erased half of the tapes. This shows how much has changed between the public wave that peaked in 1981 and the current private wave.
Name:
Anonymous2016-08-11 6:14
Obama is secretly a dolphin.
Name:
Anonymous2016-08-11 6:47
>>46 Swillary is even less charismatic than Nixon, but appears to be just as scandal-ridden and corrupt. I almost hope she wins just to see her inevitable impeachment and *gate moment.
Name:
Anonymous2016-08-11 11:34
>>48 So both Hillary and Trump were caught selling America to Russians?
Trump supporters: "I like Trump because he says what he means." Trump: "Assassinate my opponent" Trump supporters: "He didn't mean that" Trump: "Obama is the founder of ISIS" Trump supporters: "He didn't mean that"
Name:
Anonymous2016-08-12 4:23
Wow, there is actually a buttblasted Trump hater on /lounge/. How painful must it be to have to pretend that Swillary isn't the worst candidate in decades because you feel jealous of how Trump has spent his life being a famous, wealthy free-thinker who bangs nothing but supermodels and after a lifetime of fun and prestige will soon be president? Damn, that must really boil your butt.
Name:
Anonymous2016-08-12 7:00
The Trump meme is kill
Name:
Anonymous2016-08-12 8:23
>>53 Both candidates this year are the worst in decades.
>>55 No, they're always total trash. Obama was a corrupt pile of shit who worked for pharmaceutical companies and banks, just like the corrupt morons who preceded him. Donald Trump looks honest and trustworthy next to any candidate in the last few decades. He might have conned a few people but he never got bribed to start wars or destroy entire industries.
Puritans and Feminists join forces with a playboy billionaire to outlaw porn. This would be a great comedy series
Name:
Anonymous2016-08-14 16:31
Trump blames 'disgusting' media: 'I would be beating Hillary by 20'
Nah, still too dumb to realize its about porn, not many care about election fraud, middleeast or mexicans. Even economy and terrorism can't compete with porn. Its the modern opiate of the masses and he threatened to cut the supply(manga and hentai are also 'obscene' if we consider it.). http://www.complex.com/life/2016/08/donald-trump-promises-ban-porn-if-elected-president
against free speech against freedom of the press against abortion against gay marriage against vaccination against equal protection of the laws against separation of church and state against free trade against women's rights
why would anyone vote for this bigoted loser?
Name:
Anonymous2016-08-15 0:42
against abortion against gay marriage
Both of these are good What's bad is that he supports NSA spying.
>>65 Get out of here? Why do you want the world to be flooded with unwanted ethnic babies eating up resources instead of being conveniently aborted? And only a braindead Christian would give a fuck about the sanctity of the word marriage. Here's a tip: stop being a Christian, retard. Look into Vedic Hinduism if you must have some religion in your life.
Donald Trump is going to legalize love and give everyone a free brown loli after he catapults their parents over the wall. Make Pedophilia Great Again!
>>71 No, more like Rome, where it is frowned upon to do such things with a free citizen, but you can fuck your slave children as much as you want.
Name:
Anonymous2016-08-15 21:04
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fried_spider The taste has been described as bland, "rather like a cross between chicken and cod",[1] with a contrast in texture from a crispy exterior to a soft centre. The legs contain little flesh, while the head and body have "a delicate white meat inside".[1] There are certainly those who might not enjoy the abdomen, however, as it contains a brown paste consisting of organs, possibly eggs, and excrement.
Name:
Anonymous2016-08-15 21:04
>>64 "Women's rights" were the biggest mistake in human history.
Small hands and softening is no way to go through life, son.
Name:
Anonymous2016-08-27 13:38
>>83 I feel pity of Hillary. She such a strong woman, on the brink of death, but keeps fighting for Goldman Sachs and other large corporations who bribe her.
Fixed that for you.
Name:
Anonymous2016-08-27 13:46
The revelations about Hillary are never ending. Even Donald Trump who admits buying politicians donated $100,000 to Hillary’s Foundation back in 2009. While others were handing her tens of millions to get deals from the State Department, with a token $100,000, Trump was obviously just putting his name on the list for influence as he has admitted. But Hillary is really the poster child for everything that is wrong in Washington. This is politicians just in your face with corruption going wild. The fact that everyone I speak with behind the curtain knows Hillary has always been for sale, demonstrates that they are sanctioning her running for president implying they too are anything but honest.
Hillary’s tentacles even connect to Ukraine, which is starting to surface. Where at the turn of the 20th century, the corruption was seen as Rockefeller and his Standard Oil. It was portrayed as having tentacles that stretched everywhere. Today, that is Hillary.
Oligarchs who once supported Viktor Yanukovych, the fourth President of Ukraine who fled during the revolution, have cleaned their image by donating money to Hillary. The Ukrainian billionaire Victor Pinchuk, who spoke at Davos, was also the top donor for Clinton’s pretend charitable foundation.It is amazing what money can buy.
Since 2006, Pinchuk has given about 13.1 million dollars to the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton Foundation. Why are foreign billionaires donating to Hillary’s charity in the USA? It gets them access and influence on the world stage. So as mainstream media join in this conspiracy to create the coronation of Hillary, one must wonder just how bad things will get with her in the White House? Can you image her negotiating with China? She creates another “Foundation” offshore hidden from view for their donation to change policy.
Since 2006, Pikachu has given about 13.1 million dollars
Mental autocorrect does funny things sometimes.
Name:
Anonymous2016-08-28 6:01
Swillary is just too perfect. Has there ever been a less likable politician? WTF is she doing giving speeches about a gang of weeb trolls and going on jewy felon to make light of all the corruption scandals threatening to engulf her? The incompetence seems to be systemic within the 'elites' these days, we even have the corporate media pulling shit like this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZXcysU-sY8
Name:
Anonymous2016-08-28 18:33
QUESTION: Mr. Armstrong; Does Hillary have health issues? This is the hot rumor that we do not know what is true of not. Do you have any information on this topic?
Thank you
KJ
ANSWER: No I do not have any direct confirmation. I know this is the big rumor and there is probably something that is true for Hillary refuses to release her medical records. Wikileaks has release emails where her staff were investigating drugs for Parkinson’s disease. Her fall which clearly disrupted her vision was certainly no minor event. She is on blood thinners for a clot in her brain. However, what I can say is that all my direct sources have long said she is violent and acts out of anger not reason. She would often get mad at Bill and gave him a black-eye. She hit Secret Service staff and treated employees like dogs or slaves. Nobody I have spoken to has ever had a reassuring thing to say about her temperament to be president.
Suuure, totally likeable.
Name:
Anonymous2016-08-28 18:36
I have stated before that the Republicans use to have me meet with those who wanted to run for President. The potential candidate was told I was to there to brief them on how the world economy functioned. In truth, I was then asked my “opinion” if the person had the mental capacity to understand the complexity. I met with governors and others who wanted to run for President back in 1999. That’s when I was asked to meet with George Bush, Jr. but was told this one was “different, he’s really stupid.” I was shocked and asked why would they make someone “stupid” president? I was told he had the name. Ever since, it is no longer about selecting and backing good people. Today, it’s just about winning.
