>>18I love /prog/. If I divorce the poster from the posts not much can be said about anything, when the subject of the conversation is one of the posters. However I was responding to
This thread shows how much you care about others' opinions.
And if the statement is taken literally, it's a statement about myself, and by knowing myself I can know the statement is false. The error in the proof is that there is more than one motivation that could drive someone to write the posts that I have written. In my case, it is disputing claims that I know are false, and I know they are false because they are about myself. I am disputing them not with the intent to defend my perceived identity, but to correct a false claim, investigate the argument, and locate the error in reasoning. This can be fun to do when people have convoluted arguments to support their point. A notable example was an essay where the writer argued that intercourse consisting of p-n-s in v-g-i- was necessarily rape, but I have lost the link. But I will stop now as this isn't very interesting, although
>>18 was interesting.