Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

you’d never have a Republican elected in this country again

Name: Anonymous 2020-04-17 11:22

http://archive.is -> https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/03/31/want-proof-that-republicans-want-suppress-voters-just-ask-trump/
In an interview on “Fox & Friends,” Trump referenced proposals from Democrats in the coronavirus stimulus negotiations that would have vastly increased funding for absentee and vote-by-mail options. The final package included $400 million for the effort, which was far less than what Democrats had sought.
“The things they had in there were crazy,” Trump said. “They had things — levels of voting that, if you ever agreed to it, you’d never have a Republican elected in this country again.”

levels of voting that, if you ever agreed to it, you’d never have a Republican elected in this country again

Name: Anonymous 2020-04-17 11:44

Name: Anonymous 2020-04-17 12:12

No shit there's a change in the demography of the country. In a few years the US will be Brasil.

Name: Anonymous 2020-04-17 12:22

>>3
Brasil elected a far-right president in the last election, but he won the popular vote.

Name: Anonymous 2020-04-17 13:04

>>4
... after 15 years of communism which Brasil won't recover from.

If only you knew how bad things really are.

Name: Anonymous 2020-04-17 13:30

>>5
I don't know the difference between communism and socialism.
ok

Name: Anonymous 2020-04-17 13:55

>>6
They, their political enemies and the people call them communists so I call them communists.

The world cares little about your definition. The meaning depends on the context.

Name: Anonymous 2020-04-17 20:26

http://archive.is -> https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/03/30/trump-voting-republicans/
Last year, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) dismissed Democrats’ proposal to make Election Day a federal holiday, suggesting it was intended to help them win elections — apparently by increasing turnout.
“This is the Democrat plan to restore democracy?” McConnell said with a laugh. “A power grab that’s smelling more and more like exactly what it is.”
McConnell at the time referred to the underlying bill as the “Democrat Politician Protection Act.”

proposal to make Election Day a federal holiday
A power grab

Sasuga GOP.

Name: Anonymous 2020-04-18 5:28

>>6
I don't know the difference between social democracy and socialism.
Fucking liberals.

Name: Anonymous 2020-04-18 12:35

>>9
Here's why your point is superficial. The context is the previous almost 15 year period of leftist rule. The ruling party was PT, Partido dos Trabalhadores, not PSDB, Partido da Social Democracia Brasileira, who were the main opposition. The one with "social democracy" in the name has since moved to the right of its original position as far as it could afford, and to try to cover this had to resort to retreating into the defense that "left" and "right" are outdated labels, so "please stop looking at which one now applies to us, pretty please".

Name: Anonymous 2020-04-18 22:19

>>10
You're judging parties purely by the words in their name and you're calling people who realise both PT and PSDB were centrist social democrats rather than ``leftist'' superficial?

Name: Anonymous 2020-04-18 22:41

>>11
purely by the words in their name
>> has since moved to the right of its original position as far as it could afford
sasuga reading comprehension

It's much simpler than that. I judge someone who is desperate to try to save face by trying to include PT under "centrist" to be an incompetent troll with very poor bait.

Name: Anonymous 2020-04-18 22:49

To help locate the video, this article
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/mar/30/trump-republican-party-voting-reform-coronavirus
is from "Mon 30 Mar 2020 19.32 BST" and states
Donald Trump admitted on Monday that making it easier to vote in America would hurt the Republican party.
So the Fox & Friends in question should be from 30 Mar 2020. The article also provides more text that might be useful in a speech-to-text search.
“The things they had in there were crazy. They had things, levels of voting that if you’d ever agreed to it, you’d never have a Republican elected in this country again,” Trump said during an appearance on Fox & Friends. “They had things in there about election days and what you do and all sorts of clawbacks. They had things that were just totally crazy and had nothing to do with workers that lost their jobs and companies that we have to save.”

Name: Anonymous 2020-04-19 6:32

>>12
sasuga reading comprehension
Good irony.

PT are social democrats and social democrats are centrists. Sorry if this is too difficult for someone who's been subsisting on a steady diet of Earnest Voice.

Name: Anonymous 2020-04-19 10:49

https://veja.abril.com.br/blog/reinaldo/chomsky-o-velhinho-picareta/

E, de resto, o PT não é social-democrata coisa nenhuma. Continua a ser um partido de esquerda, só que mais esperto do que Chomsky. Que nem isso entendeu direito.

http://revistaepoca.globo.com/Revista/Epoca/0,,EDG77351-5855,00-O+PT+E+A+MAIOR+INVENCAO+POLITICORELIGIOSA+DO+BRASIL.html

Mir - Porque o projeto do PT não é social-democrata puro, reformista. É salvacionista. Vende a redenção. Ele não se harmoniza com uma realidade laica e republicana. É contra a pílula anticoncepcional, a biotecnologia e o progresso. É um projeto da civilização da pobreza, ...

https://forum.cifraclub.com.br/forum/11/317839/p182

o PT não é social democrata, nunca realizou essa transição às claras como fez o Partido trabalhista britânico. O próprio uso difuso e confuso da palavra social é artifício retórico para esconder isso. 

https://adonaisantanna.blogspot.com/2014/11/resposta-um-pedido.html

O PT não é social-democrata, nem nunca vai ser. Basta ver os vieses ditatoriais e demogogos que o partido vem apresentando desde que chegou ao poder.

Name: Anonymous 2020-04-19 11:02

>>15
Use actual words, mouthbreather.

Name: Anonymous 2020-04-19 11:19

https://www.commondreams.org/news/2020/03/30/harrowing-warning-all-hungary-hands-far-right-leader-dictatorial-powers-amid
The new law indefinitely suspends elections and parliament, imposes up to five years in prison for anyone who intentionally spreads what the government classifies as misinformation, and gives Orbán the authority to suspend laws by decree as he works to contain the COVID-19 outbreak. The law easily passed Hungary's parliament, which is dominated by Orbán's far-right Fidesz party, by a vote of 137 to 53.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-03-30/orban-takes-sole-command-of-hungary-with-pandemic-emergency-law
Orban’s track record indicates he may not give up the powers quickly. His anti-immigrant Fidesz party has continuously renewed a “state of emergency for mass immigration,” announced after the 2015 refugee crisis, even after the number of asylum seekers arriving to Hungary plunged.

https://www.stallman.org/archives/2020-jan-apr.html#4_April_2020_(Dictator_in_all_but_name)
Orbán is now dictator of Hungary in all but name. There is no more legislature and no more elections until he decides to bring them back.
He can imprison anyone for "spreading misinformation", whether it is true or false.

Name: Anonymous 2020-04-19 11:53

To everyone else, the Fox & Friends video in the OP to look for should be from Mon 30 Mar 2020, per >>13.

>>14
If you think simply repeating the same assertion makes it true, you might be one of the sheep who think Russia hacked the DNC servers.

PT:
- Direct unconditional payments to poor families.
- Additional direct payments to poor families conditional on school attendance.
- Microcredit scheme for poor families to bypass traditional banking.
- Recognition of a right to basic food.
- Kept oil companies and loggers mostly out of the Amazon because "lungs of the Earth". Balls of Nero fixed that.

Basically spending a chunk of the oil revenue on the poor, like Morales and Chavez did. If you hadn't backed yourself into the "centrist" corner, at this point you would pull out the "commies" strawman. Now you will have to take the position that those things are not even leftist, but "centrist", so you can simply be hooked up to a loop with this guy: https://dis.tinychan.org/read/prog/1582047203#reply_171

Name: Anonymous 2020-04-19 12:49

>>18
Literally none of those things are ``leftist'', brain genius. The abolition of private property, banning the trade in debt, an end to rent-seeking in general, those are the core of leftist policies. Trying to dull the sharpest edges of capitalism with populist distractions while fully maintaining the capitalist system is exactly what social democracy is and why it is a scam.
You're so far up the US propaganda machine's ass and its misrepresentation of left and right you think a meme insult about the DNC is going to sting with someone who thinks socdems are too far to the right, good job.

Name: Anonymous 2020-04-19 14:05

>>16
Those are indeed words, anusbreather.

Name: Anonymous 2020-04-19 14:18

To everyone else, the Fox & Friends video in the OP to look for should be from Mon 30 Mar 2020, per >>13.

>>19
Literally none of those things are ``leftist''
Of course, anon, of course, you already backed yourself into this corner. So welfare for the poor isn't leftist. Thanks for the laughs, you're a dear.

The abolition of private property, banning the trade in debt, an end to rent-seeking in general, those are the core of leftist policies.
OK, so only hardline communism qualifies as leftist to you. Since Bernie Sanders doesn't advocate "abolition of private property, banning the trade in debt, an end to rent-seeking in general" he is not a leftist. Simply brilliant. See what a ridiculous corner you backed yourself into?

is going to sting with someone who thinks socdems are too far to the right
Your attention span is a joke. From >>10:
"""The one with "social democracy" in the name has since moved to the right of its original position as far as it could afford, and to try to cover this had to resort to retreating into the defense that "left" and "right" are outdated labels, so "please stop looking at which one now applies to us, pretty please"."""

Name: Anonymous 2020-04-19 18:18

>>21
Serious question: were you dropped as a child?

Name: Anonymous 2020-04-19 18:37

>>21
So welfare for the poor isn't leftist.
You're right, it isn't. Even in austerity-wracked Europe every self-identified right-wing party that meets the electoral threshold supports welfare in some form. You'd have be an ideology-poisoned ancap not to: bread and circuses dull class consciousness and keep the workers working. Are you twelve years old not to realise this?

Bernie Sanders
It's extremely uncontroversial that Sanders is a centrist everywhere except in the US and its client states. There have been left-wing movements in the US in the past (the Black Panthers were one), but there isn't a single left-wing politician, even center-left, on the federal stage, by design. The depth of your ignorance on the subject is part of that design; congratulations on being played so effectively.

Don't feel bad, though: even most DSA members don't know the difference between demsocs and socdems.

>>10
I don't know what conversation you think is being had here but you of all people really shouldn't be throwing stones about reading comprehension.

I know you think fascism is le epic meme and that you don't know jack shit about the world, but words have meanings and ``left-wing'' is not in fact synonymous with ``people Trump and Bolsonaro whine about''.

Name: Anonymous 2020-04-19 20:38

>>23
Who defines what a word means?

Name: Anonymous 2020-04-19 20:56

To everyone else, the Fox & Friends video in the OP to look for should be from Mon 30 Mar 2020, per >>13.

>>22
https://dis.tinychan.org/read/prog/1582047203#reply_160

>>23
every self-identified right-wing party that meets the electoral threshold supports welfare in some form.
Yes, in the form of giving it lip service while cutting it as much as possible every chance they get. Furthermore, the fact that "self-identified right-wing" parties are forced into supporting it "in some form" because not doing so at all would be electoral suicide, does not magically make it no longer leftist, in the same way that they also foam at the mouth about green energy or giving women the vote.

bread and circuses
And religion. Unless you included it under circuses.

It's extremely uncontroversial that Sanders is a centrist
I already laughed at you people but you're just comedy gold. So the guy who wants to overturn the Corporations United decision is a centrist? The guy who Obama joked about as "comrade"? The guy who wants to tax the rich? The guy who wants Medicare for All, which makes actual centrists like Biden rage?

I already pointed out to you lot in >>18 that "simply repeating the same assertion" is not an argument. You might recall the scene from A Few Good Men in which JoAnne objects, is overruled by the judge, so she "strenuously objects" and is of course overruled again, and is afterwards mocked by Kaffee for having been ridiculous. This is exactly what you're doing if you think the phrase "extremely uncontroversial" enhances your argument, you are "strenuously objecting".

I don't know what conversation you think is being had here
Evidently you don't have the attention span to recall an exchange of more than two posts, which is why you have no answer to your ridiculous slip up about "is going to sting with someone who thinks socdems are too far to the right".

I know you think fascism is le epic meme
Your strawmen are quite boring.

and ``left-wing'' is not in fact synonymous with ``people Trump and Bolsonaro whine about''.
Your strawmen are quite boring.

That's two paragraphs of having no answer to your attention span slip up. Congratulations.

Name: not >>23 2020-04-20 20:24

>>25
your ridiculous slip up about "is going to sting with someone who thinks socdems are too far to the right".

Imagine a real line, positive numbers to the right of zero, negative numbers to the left of zero.

Quite conventional, right?

So lets conventionally adopt that left-wing is negative and right-wing is positive (simply because the standard real line grows to the right).

Also let P be the set of all positive numbers.

Then the assertment "A is leftwing" would be encoded as "(-A) est P" or simply "A < 0".

Evidently "A < 0" can also be understood to mean "A is to the left of the center".

Lemma:
"A < B" to mean "A is to the left of B",
"B > A" to mean "B is to the right of A".

Now, is it conceivable that B is to the right of A, and also to the left of the center?
That is, that B > A and also B < 0?
Sure. A < B < 0 is a completely valid sentence.

Pushing it further, could we say that B is very far to the right of A and also to the left of the center?
Luckily mathematicians have invented just the needed notation:
"A << B < 0"

Could we have an example?
"-10034 << -1.5 < 0"

Now, if we take "23-san=-10034", "socdems=-1.5", "center=0", we can finally say:
"23-san << socdems < 0"

Which is what I think 23-san means. (Even if they were center-left, it would still encode as < 0, only with very small absolute values.)

Name: Anonymous 2020-04-21 0:50

>>26
Biden is a much easier example of a centrist who is way too far to the right, as he is a mere one angstrom to the left of center. Your exposition is orthogonal to the exchange with the-other-anon-who-is-totally-not-you.

Name: Anonymous 2020-04-22 20:33

“Traditionally it’s always been Republicans suppressing votes in places,” Clark said at the event. “Let’s start protecting our voters. We know where they are ... Let’s start playing offense a little bit. That’s what you’re going to see in 2020. It’s going to be a much bigger program, a much more aggressive program, a much better-funded program.”
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/dec/21/trump-adviser-republicans-voter-suppression

"""Top Trump adviser: Republicans have 'always' relied on voter suppression

One of Donald Trump’s top re-election advisers told influential Republicans in swing state Wisconsin that the party has “traditionally” relied on voter suppression to compete in battleground states, according to an audio recording of a private event. The adviser said later that his remarks referred to frequent and false accusations that Republicans employ such tactics.

But the report emerged just days after news that a conservative group is forcing Wisconsin to purge upwards of 230,000 people from state voter rolls more than a year earlier than planned, a move that would disproportionately affect Democrats before the 2020 election.

And it came as the latest fund-raising totals showed that the Republican National Committee, spurred by aggressive anti-impeachment fundraising, heads into 2020 with more than seven times as much cash on hand as the Democratic National Committee – $63m for the RNC against $8.3m for the DNC, according to FEC filings, Axios reported.

Justin Clark, a senior political adviser and senior counsel to Trump’s re-election campaign, made the remarks about voter suppression on 21 November as part of a wide-ranging discussion about strategies in the 2020 campaign, including more aggressive use of monitoring of polling places on election day in November 2020.

“Traditionally it’s always been Republicans suppressing votes in places,” Clark said at the event. “Let’s start protecting our voters. We know where they are ... Let’s start playing offense a little bit. That’s what you’re going to see in 2020. It’s going to be a much bigger program, a much more aggressive program, a much better-funded program.”

Asked about the remarks, by the Associated Press, which obtained the audio recording, Clark said he was referring to false accusations that the Republican party engages in voter suppression.

“As should be clear from the context of my remarks, my point was that Republicans historically have been falsely accused of voter suppression and that it is time we stood up to defend our own voters,” Clark said. “Neither I nor anyone I know or work with would condone anyone’s vote being threatened or diluted and our efforts will be focused on preventing just that.”

Clark made the comments on the audio file in a meeting of the Republican National Lawyers Association’s Wisconsin chapter. Attendees included the state Senate’s top Republican, Scott Fitzgerald, along with the executive director of the Wisconsin Republican party.

Audio of the event at a country club in Madison obtained by the liberal group American Bridge was provided to AP by One Wisconsin Now, a Madison-based liberal advocacy group.

The roughly 20-minute audio offers an insider’s glimpse of Trump’s re-election strategy, showing the campaign focusing on voting locations in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania, which form the the so-called “blue wall” of traditional Democratic strength that Trump broke through to win in 2016.

Republican officials publicly signaled plans to step up their Election Day monitoring after a judge in 2018 lifted a consent decree in place since 1982 that barred the Republican National Committee from voter verification and other “ballot security” efforts. Critics have argued the tactics amount to voter intimidation.

Across America, as it heads into this crucial election year, while some states have enacted policies that make it easier to cast a ballot, many have gone in the opposite direction.

In 2016, Wisconsin had 62 paid Trump staff working to get out the vote; in 2020, it will increase to around 100, Clark said.

Trump supports the effort, Clark said in the audio recording.

“We’ve all seen the tweets about voter fraud, blah, blah, blah,” Clark said. “Every time we’re in with him, he asks what are we doing about voter fraud? What are we doing about voter fraud?’ The point is he’s committed to this, he believes in it and he will do whatever it takes to make sure it’s successful.”

Clark said Trump’s campaign plans to focus on rural areas around mid-size cities like Eau Claire and Green Bay, areas he says where Democrats “cheat”. He did not explain what he meant by cheating and did not provide any examples.

There is no evidence of widespread voter fraud in Wisconsin.

The dispute about purging voters is the latest in a series of voting rights brawls in Wisconsin, considered one of the most important states in the upcoming presidential election. In recent years, Republicans drew electoral districts that severely benefitted their party, unsuccessfully tried to limit early voting, and implemented a strict voter ID law. The law discouraged as many as 23,252 people in the state from casting a ballot in 2016, one estimate found.

“If there’s bad behavior on the part of one side or the other to prevent people from voting, this is bad for our democracy,” Wisconsin Democratic Gov. Tony Evers said in reaction to Clark’s comments.

Wisconsin’s attorney general, Democrat Josh Kaul, represented the Democratic National Committee in a 2016 New Jersey lawsuit that argued the GOP was coordinating with Trump to intimidate voters. Kaul argued then that Trump’s campaign “repeatedly encouraged his supporters to engage in vigilante efforts” in the guise of ferreting out potential voter fraud. The Republican party disputed any coordination.

Mike Browne, deputy director of One Wisconsin Now, said Clark’s comments suggest the Trump campaign plans “underhanded tactics” for 2020.

Earlier this week Georgia proceeded with a mass purge of 300,000-plus voters from the rolls, despite an activist group founded by rising-star Democrat Stacey Abrams asking a court to halt the plan.

Voter suppression as a tactic – from strict ID laws to closing polling places to purging voter rolls – is deliberately making it hard for minority communities in America, which traditionally lean towards the Democratic party, to exercise their right to vote, a Guardian’s ongoing The Fight to Vote special series found."""

Name: Anonymous 2020-04-22 21:04

I don't wanna die and become a Democrat voter.

Name: Anonymous 2020-04-23 0:06

>>29
Just transmigrate into a dinosaur.

Name: Anonymous 2020-04-23 8:34

Why do you assholes have to insert political garbage everywhere?

Name: Anonymous 2020-04-23 15:32

Why do your assholes have to insert political shit everywhere?

Name: Anonymous 2020-04-24 1:54

What programming language is this?

Name: Anonymous 2020-04-24 3:11

>>33
It's not a programming language. It's a search for a solution to the voter halting problem on a Trumping Machine >>13

Name: Anonymous 2020-04-27 10:51

“And then I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in a minute. One minute! And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning."
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/23/trump-coronavirus-treatment-disinfectant

"""Coronavirus: medical experts denounce Trump's theory of 'disinfectant injection'

Doctors warn US president’s musings on disinfectant as a cure for coronavirus could lead to death

Donald Trump has stunned viewers by suggesting people could receive injections of disinfectant to cure the coronavirus, a notion one medical expert described as “jaw-dropping”.

At Thursday’s White House coronavirus taskforce briefing, the US president mused on new government research into how the virus reacts to different temperatures, climates and surfaces.

Trump said: “And then I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in a minute. One minute! And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning. Because you see it gets in the lungs and it does a tremendous number on the lungs. So it would be interesting to check that. So, that, you’re going to have to use medical doctors with. But it sounds interesting to me.”

Dr Deborah Birx, the taskforce response coordinator, remained silent. But social media erupted in outrage at the president, who has a record of defying science and also floated the idea of treating patients’ bodies with ultraviolet (UV) light.

Several doctors warned the public against injecting disinfectant or using UV light and a leading household cleaner manufacturer urged users not to inject it into their bodies.

Reckitt Benckiser, the British-based maker of Dettol and Lysol, said in a statement: “We must be clear that under no circumstance should our disinfectant products be administered into the human body (through injection, ingestion or any other route).”

Political commentators joined the condemnation. Robert Reich, a professor of public policy at the University of California at Berkeley and a former labor secretary, tweeted: “Trump’s briefings are actively endangering the public’s health. Boycott the propaganda. Listen to the experts. And please don’t drink disinfectant.”

Walter Shaub, the former director of the Office of Government Ethics, added: “It is incomprehensible to me that a moron like this holds the highest office in the land and that there exist people stupid enough to think this is OK. I can’t believe that in 2020 I have to caution anyone listening to the president that injecting disinfectant could kill you.”

Trump was already facing a backlash over his championing of hydroxychloroquine, an anti-malaria drug, as a therapy for the coronavirus, a quixotic effort amplified by the conservative network Fox News. Research has found no evidence that it is beneficial and a government vaccine expert has claimed he was fired for limiting its use.

Undeterred, on Thursday Trump showcased an “emerging result” from Department of Homeland Security research that indicates coronavirus appears to weaken more quickly when exposed to sunlight, heat and humidity, raising hopes that it could become less contagious in summer months.

Bill Bryan, the acting homeland security undersecretary for science and technology, said at the briefing: “Our most striking observation to date is the powerful effect that solar light appears to have on killing the virus – both surfaces and in the air. We’ve seen a similar effect with both temperature and humidity as well, where increasing the temperature and humidity or both is generally less favourable to the virus.”

Researchers found that the virus survives best indoors and in dry conditions, and loses potency when temperatures and humidity rise. Bryan said: “The virus dies the quickest in the presence of direct sunlight under these conditions.”

He showed a slide summarising the results of the experiment that were carried out at the National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center. He also said tests had been carried out with disinfectants and isopropyl alcohol, specifically in saliva or in respiratory fluids.

“And I can tell you that bleach will kill the virus in five minutes; isopropyl alcohol will kill the virus in 30 seconds, and that’s with no manipulation, no rubbing – just spraying it on and letting it go. You rub it and it goes away even faster. We’re also looking at other disinfectants, specifically looking at the Covid-19 virus in saliva.”

Trump seized on the findings to refer back to a claim he made on 14 February that warm weather might kill the virus, like common flu, noting that he had been criticised by the media. “I think a lot of people are going to go outside, all of a sudden, people that didn’t want to go outside,” he said.

And he asked Bryan an extraordinary question: “So I asked Bill a question that probably some of you are thinking of, if you’re totally into that world, which I find to be very interesting. So, supposing we hit the body with a tremendous – whether it’s ultraviolet or just very powerful light – and I think you said that that hasn’t been checked, but you’re going to test it.

“And then I said, supposing you brought the light inside the body, which you can do either through the skin or in some other way, and I think you said you’re going to test that too. It sounds interesting.”

Bryan responded: “We’ll get to the right folks who could.”

UV rays are an invisible type of radiation that can penetrate and damage skin cells, and overexposure can cause skin cancer. How much sunlight would be needed to have an effect on the coronavirus is unknown. The virus has caused heavy death tolls in warm-weather areas such as Louisiana and Florida, and Singapore has seen a recent surge in cases.

A Washington Post reporter asked if it was dangerous for Trump to make people think they would be safe by going outside in summer heat. The president turned to Bryan and said: “I would like you to speak to the medical doctors to see if there’s any way that you can apply light and heat to cure.

“Maybe you can, maybe you can’t. Again, I say, maybe you can, maybe you can’t. I’m not a doctor.”

In a cringeworthy moment, he asked Birx if she had ever heard of heat and light in relation to the coronavirus. “Not as a treatment,” she said, explaining that the body responds to the virus with a fever.

When the Post reporter pressed further, Trump retorted: “I’m the president and you’re fake news … I’m just here to present talent, I’m here to present ideas.”

Experts questioned why the homeland security report had been promoted at the briefing. Dr Irwin Redlener, the director of the Center for Disaster Preparedness at Columbia University, told MSNBC: “Everything that this scientist talked about from homeland security was basically incoherent, nonsensical, not really supported by evidence and really quite contrary to a lot of things that we do know about some of the things he was saying.

“First of all, people do get Covid, have been getting Covid in warm climates. Second of all, this issue with UV light is hypothetical, but also UV light can be very harmful and we did not hear anything resembling a balanced discussion of what the evidence is for and against UV light, but it’s certainly not ready for prime time.”

He added: “The very fact that the president actually asked somebody about what sounded like injecting disinfectants or isopropyl alcohol into the human body was kind of jaw-dropping.”
"""

Name: Anonymous 2020-04-27 15:30

this time i must defend the prez

why does the body react to virus with fever?

because fever heats up the body possibly killing it

this is 101 shit

does light carry heat also? what is radiation? physics 101 shit

is human a mammal? are mammals warm blooded? do mammals try to keep a constant temperature through negative feedback loops irrespective of climate? biology 101 shit

fakeass crackers

pedantic mofos

truth cares not who says it

Name: Anonymous 2020-04-27 22:48

>>36
POTUS already preempted all your hogwash by claiming he was being sarcastic. In underage chanspeak he defended himself by literally resorting to "I was only pretending to be retarded".

Name: Anonymous 2020-04-27 23:00

>>37
well that was just his defense mechanism once he was put into the defensive (and made to backtrack a truth, good job fakers)

but what he said then was true irrespective of what he said after

"truth cares not if who says it is Donald Trump or Hannah Arendt"

Name: What programming language is this? 2020-04-28 8:05

What programming language is this?

Name: Anonymous 2020-04-28 9:55

>>39
1. It's not a programming language. It's a search for a solution to the voter halting problem on a Trumping Machine >>13

2. (() => {
const items = "Ada,ALGOL,BASIC,C,C++,COBOL,Common Lisp,Emacs Lisp,Fortran,Haskell,Java,JavaScript,Pascal,PHP,Prolog,Python,Scheme,Simula,Smalltalk".split (",")
const pick = () => items [Math.floor (Math.random () * items.length)]
Array.from (document.getElementsByClassName ("body")).filter (e => /^whatprogramminglanguageisthis$/i.test (e.innerText.replace (/[^a-zA-Z]+/g, ""))).forEach (e => { e.innerHTML += "<hr /><p>you rolled: " + pick () + "</p>"; })
}) ()

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List