you’d never have a Republican elected in this country again

http://archive.is -> https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/03/31/want-proof-that-republicans-want-suppress-voters-just-ask-trump/

In an interview on “Fox & Friends,” Trump referenced proposals from Democrats in the coronavirus stimulus negotiations that would have vastly increased funding for absentee and vote-by-mail options. The final package included $400 million for the effort, which was far less than what Democrats had sought.
“The things they had in there were crazy,” Trump said. “They had things — levels of voting that, if you ever agreed to it, you’d never have a Republican elected in this country again.”

levels of voting that, if you ever agreed to it, you’d never have a Republican elected in this country again

To everyone else, the Fox & Friends video in the OP to look for should be from Mon 30 Mar 2020, per >>13.

>>22
https://dis.tinychan.org/read/prog/1582047203#reply_160

>>23

every self-identified right-wing party that meets the electoral threshold supports welfare in some form.

Yes, in the form of giving it lip service while cutting it as much as possible every chance they get. Furthermore, the fact that "self-identified right-wing" parties are forced into supporting it "in some form" because not doing so at all would be electoral suicide, does not magically make it no longer leftist, in the same way that they also foam at the mouth about green energy or giving women the vote.

bread and circuses

And religion. Unless you included it under circuses.

It's extremely uncontroversial that Sanders is a centrist

I already laughed at you people but you're just comedy gold. So the guy who wants to overturn the Corporations United decision is a centrist? The guy who Obama joked about as "comrade"? The guy who wants to tax the rich? The guy who wants Medicare for All, which makes actual centrists like Biden rage?

I already pointed out to you lot in >>18 that "simply repeating the same assertion" is not an argument. You might recall the scene from A Few Good Men in which JoAnne objects, is overruled by the judge, so she "strenuously objects" and is of course overruled again, and is afterwards mocked by Kaffee for having been ridiculous. This is exactly what you're doing if you think the phrase "extremely uncontroversial" enhances your argument, you are "strenuously objecting".

I don't know what conversation you think is being had here

Evidently you don't have the attention span to recall an exchange of more than two posts, which is why you have no answer to your ridiculous slip up about "is going to sting with someone who thinks socdems are too far to the right".

I know you think fascism is le epic meme

Your strawmen are quite boring.

and ``left-wing'' is not in fact synonymous with ``people Trump and Bolsonaro whine about''.

Your strawmen are quite boring.

That's two paragraphs of having no answer to your attention span slip up. Congratulations.