you’d never have a Republican elected in this country again

http://archive.is -> https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/03/31/want-proof-that-republicans-want-suppress-voters-just-ask-trump/

In an interview on “Fox & Friends,” Trump referenced proposals from Democrats in the coronavirus stimulus negotiations that would have vastly increased funding for absentee and vote-by-mail options. The final package included $400 million for the effort, which was far less than what Democrats had sought.
“The things they had in there were crazy,” Trump said. “They had things — levels of voting that, if you ever agreed to it, you’d never have a Republican elected in this country again.”

levels of voting that, if you ever agreed to it, you’d never have a Republican elected in this country again

To everyone else, the Fox & Friends video in the OP to look for should be from Mon 30 Mar 2020, per >>13.

>>19

Literally none of those things are ``leftist''

Of course, anon, of course, you already backed yourself into this corner. So welfare for the poor isn't leftist. Thanks for the laughs, you're a dear.

The abolition of private property, banning the trade in debt, an end to rent-seeking in general, those are the core of leftist policies.

OK, so only hardline communism qualifies as leftist to you. Since Bernie Sanders doesn't advocate "abolition of private property, banning the trade in debt, an end to rent-seeking in general" he is not a leftist. Simply brilliant. See what a ridiculous corner you backed yourself into?

is going to sting with someone who thinks socdems are too far to the right

Your attention span is a joke. From >>10:
"""The one with "social democracy" in the name has since moved to the right of its original position as far as it could afford, and to try to cover this had to resort to retreating into the defense that "left" and "right" are outdated labels, so "please stop looking at which one now applies to us, pretty please"."""