Is RMS alive?

----- Forwarded Message -----

From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
To: chaosesqueteam@yahoo.com <chaosesqueteam@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 08:59:56 PM EDT
Subject: Re: Could you please sue GRSecurity.


[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]


> RMS: please. You sued Cisco.
> Yet this is allowed? (they violate the copyright on your GCC, in addition to the Linux Kernel)



It is not clear that they are violating the copyright on GCC. It
looks like what they are doing may be lawful.

We have nothing legally to do with Linux, the kernel.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)









Re: To RMS.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(responded with:)


They are distributing non-separable derivative works to GCC under a no-redistribution agreement.
Which is an additional restriction forbidden by the license you granted to them of your Copyrighted work (infact of your own Authorship aswell).

>may be lawful
See the word you used: may
Anything may be lawful before a case of first impression is brought.
Please bring one.

Those patches and plugins they distribute cannot be used with anything other than GCC
They are infact non-seperable derivative works. You have standing and reason to sue.
Please do so.

PLEASE.

Is RMS alive?
RMS hated the BSD License.
TodayRMS treats the GPL as if it were the BSD License.

RMS sued cisco and won a hefty settlement for GPL violation of GCC. A settlement he could live the rest of his life on
TodayRMS won't sue Grsecurity for GPL violation of GCC.

RMS wasn't ascared of anything, would fight forever.
TodayRMS gives every excuse, for years and years, to take no action.

RMS was vocal, always arguing and fighting; showing the Jewish Revolutionary Spirit. Always going /Forward/
TodayRMS is quiet as a mouse; like an employed white person.

RMS never backed down and never apologized for his beliefs and opionions.
TodayRMS deletes and apologises for "pedo opinions" and reverses them saying he was wrong. Then deletes them from his website.

RMS was not a fan of women's ways: often criticizing their "look at me I'm having a baby" announcements on his techical forum. (a mailing list as said venue)
TodayRMS is a friend of women: even though they won't "let" him fk them.

RMS was a Zealot on privacy. Free software was for the user; not the developer.
TodayRMS is fine with "free software" phoning home (see: Audacity), no problem whatsoever: within the text of the license. Free software may phone home if the developer wants it to. Pingbacks are fine. For a desktop program that doesn't need any networking. TodayRMS think's that's fine.


RMS was a fat fk in a red shirt.
TodayRMS is sometimes a skinnyish fk in a red shirt and a giant GIANT face mask on. Sometimes fat fk in a red shirt. Changes by the venue.
(Always a red shirt now though: to keep "on brand")

My friend was a fat fk: he did a desk job (engineer) for a federal contractor building thermo nuclear submarines, which were billed as regular fission submarines. He died at 37 of a blood clot to the lungs.

Here we have:
1) Big change in personality
2) Change in apperance, and masks used

How do we know he's not dead? My friend was like him and is dead. RMS gets to be a fat fk forever and we don't question any of this when his personality changes along with his apperance?

Old RMS would have sued Grsecurity.
What is new RMS?
How do we know that RMS today isn't just a product?

>>1

HAHA YA FUCKIN YAHOOZLE WAY TO HIDE YOUR INDIANNESS

#include <conio.h>

#include <penis.h>

#include <bunghole.h>

#include <cornhole.h>

#include <cornholio.h>

What programming language is this?

>>9
C Shart

>Linus Torvalds has been consistent over many years that the GPL to him says that "If you make changes, you have to send the changes back to me." These statements of his have been publicized widely, and he's repeated them many times at conferences.
Yes, that's a codicil, the original Copyright owner can do that: and Linus is just that.

But this is adding demands to the GPL \u2014 there exists no requirement in the GPL that someone making changes contribute those changes back,

Correct: Linus is the original (and current) Copyright holder of Linux: he can set the licensing terms for his Property any way he wishes: distributed works cannot as they are subject to the original copyright holder's terms.

One of Linus' terms are that ALL changes must be sent back to him.
He's memorialized this requirement publicly many times, as GRSecurity agrees.

something the current Vice President of the FSF pointed out to Torvalds directly back in 2007: "I'm afraid that's not what the GPLv2 says. There's no provision whatsoever about giving anything back. Not in the spirit, not in the legal terms."

The FSF doesn't hold Copyright to Linux(R) and cannot set the terms: no matter how many suggested licenses they publish. Linus is the Copyright Holder and can and does set the terms.

The terms to the Linux Kernel are the GPL+Linus' Codicil(s): which include some allowances that the verbatium GPL does not; and additional requirements: as Linus has published.

Grsecurity doesn't allow archive.org to save their pages because they don't want it to come back to them in court that they agree that Linus has added these requirements to his original non-derivative Work.
Grsecurity is a non-seperable Derivative Work and is subject to the requirements Linus has published.
Including those of the GPL.

An infinite number of monkeys typing into GNU emacs would never make a good program.

- Some guy that made Linux

>>11
"You can modify but only if you send me the result" stipulations are infuriating. What happens when Linus dies? What if someone has an old version with outdated contact info?

I see this shit a fair bit on the "terms" for old Doom patch WADs and good fucking luck getting in touch with anyone whose only contact info is a Compuserve address from the 90s. Guess I'll just "pirate" their stupid WADs.

>>13
>What happens when Linus dies? What if someone has an old version with outdated contact info?
Best effort might be good enough; and save proof of doing so.

>>13

What happens when Linus dies?

Estate owns the copyright; so send the changes to them; plus to his old addresses.
I think that will cover you.

Naturally Grsecurity never sends the patches to him.

he aint doing too hot
https://www.theregister.com/2023/09/29/richard_stallman_cancer/

>>16
Depressing

>>17
Why is that depressing? When he dies he'll rejoin with 涼宮ハルヒ.

>>16
Geez, he is barely recognizable without that ginormous beard.

>>19
Reminds me of Knuth somehow.

>>19
Looks better. But could that really be the same person? Why would someone hide a strong jaw with a giant beard?

>>16
Why did he listen to the transfaggots and get the shot instead of the hackers?

>>22
Some transfaggots are pretty smart, maybe they could be the hackers.

>>23
My observation is that they stop coding after getting their genitals cut off and thrown in a waste bin.
In that way they become like women.

>>22
Nah, he listened to George Washington, so he can win the war against the tories. The cancer is just the smallpox talking.
>>24
Where do you observe these things anon?
In your mutilation dairies?

>>24
What is the number of observations in this statistic?

If something is labeled GNU there’s a 50/50 chance it will suck. The FSF and GNU project are lazy and cheap. They stopped putting out quality software decades ago. Now they are just a masturbation cult around Stallman. Those morons are still wasting their time on useless projects that have no purpose, like Hurd which nobody wants or will ever use anyway. Do you really trust a bunch of fat out of touch programmers to develop a good alternative social network? They don’t even know what socializing is.

>>27 >what socializing is.
why did stallman ever think being fat would get him the women?
what about the girls?

sovinist fat pork