I just want a productive modern language with fast binaries and little retardation.
Why do they always come in and spoil the fun by introducting some uber complicated security system.
Now even D has lifetimes and a stupid safe/unsafe distinction.
Name:
Anonymous2020-08-01 13:29
security is based, literally weaponized autism in a computer form. classic buffer overflows exploited the fact that code and data are the same in memory and rewritten programs from the inside, and when they made it impossible to modify code the securityfags invented ROP and managed to use bits and pieces of existing code to make their exploits anyway. I dunno, there's something cool about all that.
lifetimes and overcomplicated shit are annoying, but this is not solely the fault of securityfags, the blame lies on sepplesfags who tried to make insecure language into a secure one by bolting on overcomplicated features, because that's how seeplesfags solve every problem. then rustfags decided to make an entire language out of that, and now people think that this is the way to do security.