Mentifex declassified

https://www.nothingisreal.com/mentifex_faq.html
He is an crook!

http://ai.neocities.org/mentifex_faq.html

http://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.speech/yahN5-cOAQk/noUBkZT93N4J

>>1
I can write such FAQ about anyone. That is called "ad hominem attack", and frequently used in politics. For example, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_citizenship_conspiracy_theories

write FAQs about our pet bydlo, C*dder and FrozenAnus! Edited on 24/10/2018 13:58.

>>3↵
write HQs about our pet bydlo, C*dder and FrozenAnus!
write FAQs about our pet bydlo, C*dder and FrozenAnus!

4.2 Help! Murray has started disrupting my favourite newsgroup/website/wiki/blog. How do I get rid of him?

>

Don’t get your hopes up. Oblivious to all criticism and requests to cease and desist, Murray has been pontificating his AI theory on the Internet and in print for over thirty years. There is no evidence to suggest that he is about to stop any time soon.

This document was written 10 years ago.

Extract Mentifex. He must admit his role.

>>4
The three of them are russians and spread fake news about a game released soon, a browser without bloat released soon and algorithms to achieve infinite compression.

>>7

achieve infinite compression

They reduce entropy by transforming the representation into polynomials or reversible low-entropy variation. https://dis.tinychan.org/read/prog/1539263692

I wish I had the motivation that Anusfex has.
Imagine doing the same shit over and over, without being discouraged by constant - and I mean constant - failure, while still considering self a god.

If I had his mania, I'd have multiple my'am games to sell already, and I wouldn't even ask for funding, like hamster murderers.

>>9
I'm surprised someone would have that kind of motivation in their 70s

Mentifex must admit his role.

[2018-10-25 Thurs@SB/S] [...] When I logged in to Neocities this morning, there had been about 450 page-views in the last twenty-four hours, when I consider even three hundred page-views to be exceptional. Of course, I had done a lot of posting on Reddit last night.

I keep coming back to the idea of the straight-up vertical-cliff enormity of it all if my Lebenswerk becomes widely acknowledged as the pivotal AI breakthrough that everybody has been waiting for. If people conclude that my AI is truly thinking, then they thereby automatically acknowledge the breakthrough.

The invention of AI outranks a lot of other inventions -- the airplane, the atomic bomb, the LASER. There are thousands of people trying to create an AI mind, but without a theory of mind such as I have, they do not know what to code.

[(Красавица) of ... just stopped by and talked with me.]

However, in the so-called "AI community", I get the feeling that there is enormous resistance to any idea of letting my life-work be acknowledged as the pivotal AI breakthrough. Some outfits might try to incorporate my accomplishments in their own AI designs and just brush past me, like Sarnoff did with the true inventor of television, but such a denouement is actually a positive outcome for me because then I may escape the blame of creating AI. [...]

I don't mind being regarded as a weirdo on the Internet, because I think a lot of Netizens enjoy following my activities. It's when I threaten to upset the entire AI apple-cart that people get upset, as if they don't want some amateur to win the day.
--
http://cyborg.blogspot.com

>>12
Beschreibe meinen Anus in Grau!!!!!

>>12
You really really believe your shitty diagrams and poorly written IE6 Javascript random sentence generator is a ``breakthrough AI", don't you?

>>14
What I really don’t get is why he doesn’t write any new code. It’s bad but it’s not like novices don’t write shit code on their first efforts. It seems he’s content riding off into the sunset with an incomprehensible Markov chain script from 1987 being his only achievement ever.

>>15
he is mentally ill

>>16
Mentifex derives self-esteem from imagined world-class AI researcher status, so its self-perpetuating.

Delusion-as-defense: defense of the mind against lower self-esteem and depression.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grandiose_delusions

>>17

here is no significant gender difference in the establishment of grandiose delusion

Actually, many old Russian women still believe they are beautiful, and insist that they still look like in their 20ies, despite my best and well argumented attempt to prove otherwise. If that is not a delusion, then what is? Then again, all Russians have this illusion of grandeur, that their Russia is the best, America lost cold war, etc..

>>18
make your're are game

>>16
Not an argument
Deranged loons can write software while raving about god and phosphorescent africans
If mental fex spent set off 1% - literally just 1% - of the time he spends raving and shilling, and put that into programming, he could have an ``app'' that actually generates grammatically correct sentences.