Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

play game

Name: Anonymous 2016-08-23 10:45

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-08 13:12

>>159
You can be a free software advocate without being an open source advocate. Open source development inherently requires the freedoms of free software while free software philosophy can work without open source development.

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-08 14:03

>>161
But that's not what "orthogonal" means. Orthogonal means that things can vary independently of each other. If one thing implies another, they are inequivalent but not quite orthogonal.

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-08 14:20

>>162
Orthogonal means at 90 degrees. Checkmate. /thread

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-08 18:13

>>159
If that were true, then non-free open source software would be possible.
>>160
Open source development inherently requires the freedoms of free software

Most JavaScript code is non-free but open-source.

>>163
You're thinking of perpendicular.

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-08 19:00

>>164
I've never paid for JavaScript code, please explain how it is non-free.

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-08 19:01

>>164
Most JavaScript code is non-free but open-source.
Wrong, nigger.

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-08 19:16

>>165
“Free software” means software that respects users' freedom and community. Roughly, it means that the users have the freedom to run, copy, distribute, study, change and improve the software. Thus, “free software” is a matter of liberty, not price. To understand the concept, you should think of “free” as in “free speech,” not as in “free beer”. We sometimes call it “libre software,” borrowing the French or Spanish word for “free” as in freedom, to show we do not mean the software is gratis.

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-08 19:22

>>160
You need to calm down. If you weren't so insane you'd probably have an actual girlfriend or a job.

Girlfriends are illegal. Women made it so the second they gained political power over 100 years ago. I do not want a womanfriend. I want a girlfriend.

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-08 19:23

>>156
Free Software "advocate" mocks actual open-source/free/libre contributor/programmer.

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-08 19:44

>>169
open-source/free/libre contributor/programmer.
And who is that guy?

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-08 20:16

>>167
Yeah well what's stopping the users from running, not running, copying, distributing, studying and changing most of the Javashit that is on the Internet? It's open source and client, anyone who can use a browser can do anything they want with it.

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-08 22:33

>>164
Most JavaScript code is non-free but open-source.
Open source software has a definition and this definition requires more than simply "everybody can see the source code". For example, the unreal engine source code is visible for everybody, but the licensing does not fulfill the open source definition properly.

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-08 22:37

>>171
Sometimes those JS programs are "minified" which makes reading the program as impractical as reading decompiled binaries. This will conflict with freedom 1, the right to tinker with the software. Not only that users don't have any clear authority to redistribute the source code in modified or non-modified forms. Free software requires that all users have the right to practise all four freedoms and this is not so in the case of most Javascript programs.

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-11 19:11

Release 105:
New vehicles imported and added (spacecraft) with lasers and pulse lasers as armaments,

New entities for mappers to put down buildings in their maps (building_sctiles, etc), many entities added to netradiants entities.ent file (vehicles, food, drink, nades, etc).

Bugfixes, cleanup.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYNjAKLtEYw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oXh2LKnMZDk

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-14 11:28

>>170
The twitterer? Who knows.

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-15 9:05

play game

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-15 10:34

DubsCheckerFactory theDubsCheckerFactory = new DubsCheckerFactory(null, null);
DubsChecker theDubsChecker = theDubsCheckerFactory.createDubsChecker(DubsCheckerFactory.DUBSCHECKEM);
theDubsChecker.checkRepeatingIntegersAlsoKnownAsDubs(thePostNumber);

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-15 16:15

EXPERIENCED DEVELOPER version

DubsCheckerFactory theDubsCheckerFactory = new DubsCheckerFactory(null, null);
DubsCheckerFactoryWorker theDubsCheckerFactoryWorker = new DubsCheckerFactoryWorker(theDubsCheckerFactory);
DubsCheckerFactoryWorkerTask theDubsCheckerFactoryWorkerTask = new DubsCheckerFactoryWorkerTask(theDubsCheckerFactoryWorker.DUBSCHEKEMTASK, thePostNumber);
theDubsCheckerFactoryWorker.addTaskToQueue(theDubsCheckerFactoryWorkerTask);
theDubsCheckerFactoryWorker.executeAllTasks();
theDubsCheckerFactory.fireWorkersWith(theDubsCheckerFactory.EMPTYQUEUE);

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-15 20:37

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-16 2:20

>>177
DubsCheckerFactory theDubsCheckerFactory = new DubsCheckerFactory(null, null);

Calling a constructor raw (not using a factory)? code smell

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-16 3:04

>>180
So how are you supposed to instantiate a DubsCheckerFactoryFactory object? With a DubsCheckerFactoryFactoryFactory?

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-16 3:09

>>178

This code is not general enough, what if I want to check base n dubs? also I want to be able to choose the dubs checking strategy (regular expression, (n % 100) % 11 == 0, (n % 10) == (n % 100) / 10, or another one) an AbstractDubsCheckerFactoryBuilder implementation would solve this limitations

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-17 1:48

>>181
Dependency injection, you should be editing Spring configuration files for this

Name: Anonymous 2017-02-09 7:19

sage

Name: Anonymous 2017-02-19 8:56

sage

Name: Anonymous 2017-02-26 9:57

sage

Name: Anonymous 2017-03-13 20:41

sage

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List