The Blub Paradox

If Lisp is more expressive than C, why Lisp can be compiled into C and C cannot be compiled into Lisp?

>>18
Didn't they teach you at school that wikipedia can't be used as a source?
OpenCL does not implement tons of stuff presented in C.

CUDA is non von-Neumann programming language.

And? We talked about C, not CUDA.

That includes non-standard extensions and implementation defined code such as iohw.h

We know that, why are you repeating things that we know?

C doesn't have the imaginary restrictions on hardware

You can't use C with variable-word size machines.

Companies are free to implement their APIs the Embedded C standard is not stopping you to interface with your stack-only harvard 2k page-segmented memory architecture of 23-bit TrollCPU.

We know that, why are you repeating things that we know?

The current branch of discussion is about C standards/extensions and portability.

Yes, and?