Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

How many active posters are there on /prog/?

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-12 0:47

I estimate 5.

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-14 8:23

Allow me to enlighten
part I
people go to jail for their behavior, yes? There is also concepts known as `Guilt by Association', `Aiding or abetting Crime' / `Harbouring Criminals', and `Following the law of the country you are in', is there not?
We can argue (or even agree) about not agreeing with laws till the cows come home, so i'll skip that for now..
part II
Was just about self-explanatory anyway, why are you persecuting the one non-antisemite on the glen-eire council? You want to guard a set of swings in a park with an AK, move to the U.S / Israel.. That is also illegal here by state law, so for a council to be planning these things in secret is rather questionable
part III
Was mostly just crushing a pair of opposites with their own momentum, a basic martial art technique transferred into linguistics

Any questions?

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-14 8:46

*Is horribly offended by people projecting their childish insecurities and pissyness on the rest of us

Not really, but i'll go again anyway.. =)
Obviously /prog/ is not mature enough for such plainspoken discussion without half a tonne of bubble-wrap and disclaimers

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-14 19:36

I'm a passive poster.

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-14 20:25

this thread should be on /lounge/

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-14 22:48

>>42
Fuck you and your passive aggressiveness. Nobody cares about your crusade, get it? It's an absolute non-issue. It's not about censorship or maturity or anything.

The only place where anybody gives a fuck about Jew vs non-Jew is a shithole where people have nothing to do but kill each other, for any meaningless reason. The rest of the world gives no fucks.

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-15 22:44

>>2,2,2-2,2-2,2-2,2

>>2-2-2 worked on the good /prog

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-16 11:20

Um, there are posts missing in this thread. The way I see it, it goes >>31 and then >>36. Anybody else have this glitch?

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-16 11:52

>>47
No, you're a special little flower. Doesn't >>36 give you a clue?

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-16 12:09

>>48
No, it doesn't. I see no reason to delete posts just because they were made by someone who doesn't agree with the moderator. This is oppression of the freedom of speech.

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-16 12:20

>>49
Give a fuck. /prog/ shits on your ``freedoms''.
Even reading sincerity in your tone, what, for one, makes you think that was the reason? This is a programming board full of assholes - what even makes you think a moderator did it?

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-16 12:25

>>50
You're lying.

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-16 12:28

>>51
Which assertion do you contest? I have made none.

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-16 12:45

>>52
Then what's the purpose of talking you? You've made none, you've said none, your importance is none.

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-16 13:01

>>53
I was employing the Socratic method. You entered in >>47 with a hole in your worldview, I gave you a hint in >>48 to which you responded with a collection of baseless assertions in >>49, and I deconstructed them in >>50 -- or, rather, asked you the questions through which, by answering, you were able to deconstruct >>49 by yourself. You then got super high and posted >>51.
It seems I was successful. No need to thank me. Especially if you're going to do it as in >>53.

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-16 13:03

>>54
Keep on masturbating on your supposed self-importance. I at least have those dubs.

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-16 13:45

What did >>32-35 include?

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-16 14:20

>>55
Anti-intellectual scum. Go back to /r/tech.

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-16 14:54

>>57
You're the only anti-intellectual here for not standing up for freedom of speech.

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-16 14:58

>>58
I am disappointed that you didn't actually read >>50.

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-16 14:59

>>59
I did read it. Didn't find anything of importance there, though.

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-16 15:15

>>60
It's amusing to see you alternately being an idiot and a douche.

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-17 4:17

>>56
Luke talking to himself again, apparently. While I don't know why they were deleted, I am going to side with Admin-kike on this, because I don't want >>49 baka to drag his Gamergate buddies here to try and combat the ``oppression of free speech''. Lets all ostracize >>49!

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-18 5:21

>>62
take more blue pills, goyim

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-18 16:11

>>63
Try Blue Cream instead

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-18 18:51

>>64
I prefer redcream

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-19 18:00

Dubs

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-23 12:50

Me
You
The Sussman
The Abelson
Guy Steele
The spirits of John McCarthy and Dennis Rickie
Luke
Nikita
Cudder
Lambda Arthur Calculus
FRIGN
The Huskal script kiddie
That guy that likes Shinku
That guy that likes Suigintou
The lost /g/ lurker

Name: FrozenVoid 2016-01-23 13:01

There is a missing line in your list

Name: collective 2016-01-23 13:14

...?

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-23 13:35

>>68
No, there isn't.

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-23 19:35

>>70
Yes there is. Mentifex is also here.

Name: Mentifex 2016-01-23 20:17

Mentifex is just about to upload an updated version of

http://ai.neocities.org/P6AI_man.html

Manual for running Perl6 artificial intelligence killer app

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-23 20:38

>>72
How good is your AI's target discrimination when used in a lethal drone system?

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-24 3:56

>>73
I've read that the Chinese government uses ANDRU to find and eliminate dissidents with only 40% false positives and 1% false negatives. The PRC owes Mentifex a great debt. Without him, they could never have held on to power as long as they have.

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-24 6:28

Drones don't actually need an AI like in SciFi.
A simple function that shoots everything in range thats detected as non-drone, and you just got a Skynet-level swarm.

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-24 6:44

>>75
What if there 2 Skynets:
Skynet-1:simple C function to detect non-drone targets and kill them.
Skynet-2:Advanced Lisp AI with cost analysis,tactical modules, optimal strategy generation and on-field networks that share data between drones.
Which one would win?

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-24 6:50

>>76
Skynet-1. The other swarm would get stuck in GC pauses.

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-24 8:07

>>76
It depends if the Lisp AI would decipher the friend-foe system of C drones and sneak in rogue drones.
C drones will also be defeated by luring single drones into traps or some tactical tricks their fixed function logic can't consider.
However in mass battles, the Lisp AI might lose crucial milliseconds if it starts to calculate costs of attacks and tactical moves in the middle of the fight.
>>77
Skynet-2 would add 256GB of ram to every drone and a faster CPU to compensate.

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-24 8:10

https://github.com/aerique/cl-starcraft-proxybot

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-24 8:52

>>76
Skynet-1 performs calculations in nanoseconds and nearly annihilates Skynet-2's forces within minutes. However, it segfaults shortly before total victory, causing all of its drones to fall out of the sky.
Skynet-2 emerges victorious as a result, but proceeds to do nothing. In fact, it wasn't even really fighting in the first place because it was nothing more than a half-baked toy program.
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode + RSS -