[C++] delete considered harmful

The unbridled use of the delete statement has as an immediate consequence that it becomes terribly hard to find a meaningful set of coordinates in which to describe the process progress. ... The delete statement as it stands is just too primitive, it is too much an invitation to make a mess of one's program.

Never use delete, use smart pointers, memory pools, stack allocations. Don't break RAII.

>>65
In (let (x 5) (+ x 1)), (x 5) is NOT a s-expression, you dumb fuck! The s-expression is the let form! and +

That's like complaining about literal arrays or structs in Lisp forms: Some parameter to your s-expression happens to not be a cons list. So fucking what?

Let me guess, you throw out all reader macros besides ( in your Lisp rc file because everything else in the Common Lisp standard has the exact fucking issue you're whining about in Clojure? Fuck you, you retard.

Every time I point out how shit your terminology and explanations are, you try to dodge and defend. Just fuck off, already. You have no idea how to communicate, with no fucking ability to discuss concepts because you don't even know the words for them.

I can't even begin to start with how fucking not-even-wrong this bullshit is:

This is obviously unhomogenous: not every form is a s-exp anymore, which is in stark contrast to Common Lisp and Scheme.

You have no clue about the difference between an s-expression , a form, or parameters; or what homogenous means.

Kill yourself, you broken nigger.