Eating Indian food

Suddenly makes me want to program in Java.
Is this normal?

Spicy food is known to boost one's mental function for a short period of time, presumably leading programmers to an understanding of more demanding programming languages.

Unfortunately, the effect seems to be reversed for homosexuals, who actually experience a decline in mental function, which could lead to one choosing a more terrible language, such as Java.

I believe that this observation clearly exposes >>1-suke's true sexual nature.

http://cdn.damnyouautocorrect.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/autocorrect-emoji-confusion.jpg

Admin-sama-kike, please ban >>3.

YOU GOTTA BAN >>3

THAT IS JUST RACIST

>>1
You mean Haskell. You can't curry natively in Java.

>>6
Curry is British.

They sure eat a lot of curry in anime

>>7
No, curry with gravy dumped on it is British.

>>6
public class Currier<ARG1, ARG2, RET> {
public interface CurriableFunctor<ARG1, ARG2, RET> {
RET evaluate(ARG1 arg1, ARG2 arg2);
}

public interface CurriedFunctor<ARG2, RET> {
RET evaluate(ARG2 arg);
}

final CurriableFunctor<ARG1, ARG2, RET> functor;

public Currier(CurriableFunctor<ARG1, ARG2, RET> fn) { functor = fn; }

public CurriedFunctor<ARG2, RET> curry(final ARG1 arg1) {
return new CurriedFunctor<ARG2, RET>() {
public RET evaluate(ARG2 arg2) {
return functor.evaluate(arg1, arg2);
}
};
}

public static void main(String[] args) {
Currier.CurriableFunctor<Integer, Integer, Integer> add
= new Currier.CurriableFunctor<Integer, Integer, Integer>() {
public Integer evaluate(Integer arg1, Integer arg2) {
return new Integer(arg1.intValue() + arg2.intValue());
}
};

Currier<Integer, Integer, Integer> currier
= new Currier<Integer, Integer, Integer>(add);

Currier.CurriedFunctor<Integer, Integer> add5
= currier.curry(new Integer(5));

System.out.println(add5.evaluate(new Integer(2)));
}
}

By the time you finish reading this post, you will have checked my dubs

>>5
Racism is not something bad.

>>3
Ikekd

>>13
What are you trying to say? I kiked? Does that involve inhaling zyklon b and going in an oven?

>>3
Are those green bubbles?

smh

>>14
It involves shoving zykon b into your bumhole

>>14
Believer in the 6 million detected.

>>14
It involves having higher average IQ than white people, making lots of money, ruling the entire Earth and making goyim mad and jealous.

>>17
Are you denying that 6 billion were killed in the holocaust?

>>19
It's so offensive that he is trying to deny the systematic massacre of 6 trillion Chosen Ones.

>>20
It's especially offensive because my grandmother was only 7 when she became one of the 6 quadrillion victims of the holocaust.

>>18
Sounds fun.

>>21
Sounds fun.

That's not funny, my uncle died in a concentration camp.

He was a filthy jew

>>19
Are you implying that the qabbalistic number "6 million" taken from a book way before WWII has any relation to the actual number of killed Jews?

Basically, in the Hebrew magic book there's a letter "Vav" missing in the passage about entering the Jewish state (Israel), and the qabbalists took that to mean that Jews will enter Israel missing 6 (million) which will be their price for founding their nation. They started whining about 6 million persecuted/murdered/starving/etc Jews way before Adolf Hitler even came to power, as is evidenced by newspapers and books from the first half of the XXth century. It was their magic number for whining. It's no coincidence, then, that after WWII the number of killed Jews "turned out" to be none other than 6 million, and qabbalistic Jews may even believe that it reflects reality, but do you believe them? Do you believe that reality conforms to some magic number arbitrarily taken from a magic book?

>>25,26
Nice conspiracy theory.

>>27
Except that it's not.

Nice constipation theory.

>>27
See for example here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dda-0Q_XUhk

1)The Sun New York June 6 1915 Six million Jews are being persecuted in Russia.
2)New York Times Oct 8 1918 6,000,000 Jews need help , fund to rebuild Jewry.
3)New York Times Sep 8 1919 Ukrainian Jews aim to stop pogroms , Six million in peril.
4)New York Times Nov 12 1919 Jews worst victims of war sad plight of 6,000,000 Jews
5)Atlanta Constitution Feb 23 1920 Fund needed for Six Million Jews in eastern Europe and Palestine.
6)New York Times May 7 1920 Six Million Jews suffering starvation in East Europe.
7)New York Times Jul 20 1921 Save Six Million in Russia , massacre threatens all Jews.
8)Montreal Gazette Dec 29 1931 Six Million Jews face starvation in south eastern Europe.
9)New York Times May 31 1936 Intolerable suffering of millions of Jews in the European holocaust (1936 before the war!?)
10)New York Times Feb 23 1938 Six Million!!!! Jews deprived of protection in central Europe.
etc etc

ITT your favorite Touhou characters and why you hate kikes.

My favorite Touhou character is Kogasa Tatara and I hate kikes because of their shameless exploitation of the Holohoax, which they blew out of proportion thanks to the falsified reports that they forged in many of the post-war kangaroo courts. It has been over 60 years ago, yet you're still using it as an excuse to get a free pass on EVERYTHING: the insane manipulation of media, the lobbying, the atrocities you're committing against the Palestinians in the lands you STOLE thanks to your Jew friends in the United Kingdom.
Everyone knows what you're doing and you've been doing in these 50 years, the only reason this spiral of silence still exists today is because you'd be called a Nazi, an anti-semite, you'de be ostracized from society.
Can you imagine a Kurd terrorist being excused because 90 years ago the Ottomans attempted to kill his people? It would be inexcusable, but then again Jews have their friends in Hollywood who love to line their pockets by tugging at goyim's heartstrings.
I'm fucking sick and tired of your slimeball tactics. If you really have the support of people in the western hemisphere then are you still wasting no effort to influence and manipulate public opinione, kikes?

>>26
The current widely accepted number of jewish holocaust victims stands at 5.7 million. You'd think Jews being so anal to the point of plotting a worldwide conspiracy to fulfill a fringe prohpecy would lose their shit over the not-quite-6 million number.

>>33

seems close enough

>>33
Widely accepted by whom? Wikipedia still says >muh 6 gorillion

>>30
The kiketube comments are painful to read.

>>36
What's so painful? Seemed nice to me.

>>33
Census reports of nations that were occupied during the war proved that the figure of jews in total in Europe was way below 3m but show 'them' or the world the figures and you're a holocaust denier or an anti-semite. Incidentally, none of these 'cracker jews' were bonafide articles. They were Turkish descendants. The Nazi's would've needed more manpower to slaughter the jews on a daily basis compared to fighting a war on 2-3 fronts.

>>38

Census reports of nations that were occupied during the war proved that the figure of jews in total in Europe was way below 3m but show 'them' or the world the figures and you're a holocaust denier or an anti-semite

Because those numbers are pulled straight from IHR's collective anus. Holocaust deniers can't even get their numbers straight. Sometimes it's as low as 300,000. Sometimes the number goes up to 4 million. Of course, all those numbers contradict the Nazi's own Wansee Protocol, which clearly states the number of jews in occupied Europe was of 11 million jews circa 1942. The number never mattered, anyway. At best, it's a poor attempt to derail the conversation, at worst, a deliberate, dishonest attempt to strike doubt into the one of the most documented events in human history. As if the huge inconsistencies among holocaust deniers themselves wasn't suspicious enough. Regardless of the number, it'd still be a genocide.

>>39
The truth is, we don't know and won't know the answer. But blindly believing some qabbalictic number out of Tora won't get us any closer to truth.