The perfect /prog/lang

I'm trying to determine the common traits of /prog/-approved languages:
lets start
1.GC is shit.
Does everyone agree? Are incremental GC's or automatic refcounting also shit?

>>16
The benefit of a "micro-module jungle" is lots of reusable, easily testable and flexible pieces of code.

Information is shared promiscuously among distant elements of the system, often to the point where nearly all the important information becomes global or duplicated

This doesn't even make sense. What's bad in sharing "information" (code, actually)? Code reuse is a benefit. And this mention of sharing and duplication in the same sentence is simply self-contradictory. The whole point of reusing code is that it does not need to be duplicated. I think the Big Ball of Mud that the authors mention is an apt description of their own minds if anything.