If JS is typed by retards, what retards type about retards typing in JS? Did i broke the type system by typing about retards that type about retards typing in JS?
>>30 I used to think like that too. In fact everyone in the programming language theory used to think like that too. The only explaination is that type researchers are capable of mindcontrolling and brainwashing with their Hurry-Cowardcorrespondence
“Dynamic” languages can take more space (and allow more errors) in describing the overall filter, but it’s a conceptual space more easily traversed by folks who really don’t need to think much about their programs and who follow an operational model
In other words, "dynamic" typing is for coders who dun wanna tink too much about deir shitcode. Somehow I'm not surprised.
Name:
Anonymous2015-04-25 14:07
>>36 and while you sit there wanking to your code purity, I'll be getting shit done
>>37 Static typing is what helps get shit done, not the "I'll let the compiler ignore all the type errors so they blow up at runtime at an undefined point in the future" shit-language.