Reasons not to use Rust

- You think programming languages should be closed and proprietary
- You like random pauses caused by forced collection of the garbage
- You think program start-up should take minutes so you use stupid VM-languages instead
- You like broken features and memory corruption
- You sell hardware and want to deploy inefficient scripting languages only to sell more
- You only do pure programs that don't interact with the world
- You are a retard who doesn't understand the concept of ownership

Anything else?

>>54
this offers nothing but an illusion of security theatre, that is, until the formal prover that you use has been formally proven to be correct (on a formally proved secure OS). Therefore by godels theorem all software is not only insecure but impossible to prove secure. The conclusion is that we should give up and use rust even though it has no specification and no is able to prove things like memory safety that keeps being claimed about it.