This is what happens when idiots start making decisions.
"Higher density! Lower power consumption! Lower cost!"
They get so caught up chasing after those brillant[sic] marketing features that they forget about the entire purpose of memory in the first place. If you read the original paper, you'll notice that this doesn't happen with memory older than ~2010.
Time to stock up on NOS DDR3 and older, I guess...
>>6If Intel could offer free replacements for all the Pentiums affected by FDIV bug, there shouldn't be any reason why DRAM manufacturers today couldn't.