Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Functional programming beyond Haskell

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-20 8:36

We have all learned functional programming in Haskell, but there are more functional languages like Lisp, Scheme, ML, and Clean.

Why should we even bother to look further than Haskell?

- You want your programs to run faster.
- Monads drive you mad (what are they anyway? warm fuzzy things?).
- You need objects.
- You sometimes need a more powerful module system.
http://www.cs.uu.nl/wiki/pub/Stc/BeyondFunctionalProgrammingInHaskell:AnIntroductionToOCaml/ocaml.pdf

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-27 18:48

>>75
No, they aren't. They use more memory but save a lot of time (less evaluations because some stuff is memoized while some stuff is never even evaluated).
Besides, no language can be purely strict or purely non-strict, it's just a question of choosing the default, and lazy evaluation is definitely not the worst default.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List