Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Functional programming beyond Haskell

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-20 8:36

We have all learned functional programming in Haskell, but there are more functional languages like Lisp, Scheme, ML, and Clean.

Why should we even bother to look further than Haskell?

- You want your programs to run faster.
- Monads drive you mad (what are they anyway? warm fuzzy things?).
- You need objects.
- You sometimes need a more powerful module system.
http://www.cs.uu.nl/wiki/pub/Stc/BeyondFunctionalProgrammingInHaskell:AnIntroductionToOCaml/ocaml.pdf

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-21 2:53

>>17
The number of GHC extensions and things you can do in Haskell that you can't in 99% of languages confirms that Haskell is successful.

Prelude> let f x = x x

<interactive>:2:13:
Occurs check: cannot construct the infinite type: t1 = t1 -> t0
In the first argument of `x', namely `x'
In the expression: x x
In an equation for `f': f x = x x

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List