GNG is not GNU.

http://gng.z505.com/

"11. BECAUSE THE PROGRAM IS LICENSED FREE OF CHARGE, THERE IS NO WARRANTY FOR THE PROGRAM, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW."

This is not included in GPLv3

Legally, GPL software is in fact free in cost, as it states right in the license. Not free as in freedom, free as in COST.

GPL is a license, not a software.

There are many other stupid things in that site.

VIP quality site

http://gng.z505.com/cult.htm

How about FREEDOM NUMBER 5 that Stallman missed

Why did they skip freedom 4?

Cat-v quality. I hope they find the truth that they consider themselves harmful like Uriel did.

11. BECAUSE THE PROGRAM IS LICENSED FREE OF CHARGE

A bit different from "the program is free of charge"?

join us now n share gnewsense you'll b free hacka you'll b free

more like /g/ n /g/

AMIRITE AMIRITE AMIRITE

U MAD?

INSTALL GENTOO

I kinda agree. The focus on license purity is tiresome. The FSF does lots of good things, but they don't actually do any programming. I am suspicious of any organization run by lawyers (except the EFF, they still get my donations every month). And GPL advocates freely steal from BSD all the time, but get pissy when Tivo won't release their signing keys. I'm with Linus, fuck the spirit of the GPL.

>>9

The nigger is in denial. It's God. Nigger? What part of government certified
random number confuses you? Son of a bitch you are stupid.

I don't have a fucken "brand".

I have God-given authority over the whole fucken world of dumb-fuck-niggers.

You cannot revoke my authority.

My authority cannot be revoked.

Kiss my fucken ass and suck my dick. I made God's temple. I'm emperor.

I do fucken miracles, nigger. No competition. I win ridiculously easily. I
fucken land a space ship in time square and announce world domination.

The Temple Operating System
1 Kings 6:21 (King James)

King James is HERETIC

>>9
The FSF is an advocacy group. They are the primary sponsors of the GNU project which is a software project.

GPL advocates freely steal from BSD all the time, but get pissy when Tivo won't release their signing keys.

False.

Clone BSD projects and relicense under the GPL everyday.

http://www.brownrudnick.com/uploads/114/doc/Brown_Rudnick_Advisory_The_Bionic_Library_Did_Google_Work_Around_The_GPL.pdf

>>12
Of course they are an advocacy group; I'm sure they see themselves as modern abolitionist, but they come off more like PETA. The increasingly stupid rhetoric that software intrinsically deserves to be free annoys me. And the stunts they pull have.gotten old. Of course you're boycotting the latest Windows, RMS, you do this every year.

But what I really found annoying was “GNU/Linux". Of the people using Linux, 95% of them only care about gcc and coreutils. I hope distros start moving to clang so the maybe one day we can move away from GNUshit and the hold of ideology over making good programs can be broken. I don't give a fuck about your GPL spirit or Hacker ethic.

False.

True. https://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/28/157

>>15
Faggot.

>>16
Blow me, niggerkike.

>>15

False

GPL advocates steal from BSD licensed free software as much as proprietary software writers steal from BSD licensed free software: not at all. There is no stealing being done.

The increasingly stupid rhetoric that software intrinsically deserves to be free annoys me

The FSF is an advocacy group that advocates software freedom for users. The inherent basis of what the FSF do is about the political control of the software that are installed on the users' computer: users should maintain control over that software and not the distributor of the software. People who do not understand this fact argue strawmen arguments about the FSF.

But what I really found annoying was “GNU/Linux".

In practise, people rely on the GNU OS to be their OS. If your specific practise is to NOT use GNU, then your OS is practically not a variant of GNU OS and doesn't justify the GNU/Linux name. In reality, many people really do rely on GNU OS.

http://z505.com/editplug/index.htm

EditPlug is shareware and costs $40.00 CDN:

Canadian/proprietary software dev; opinion discarded.

Ehat the hell is CDN supposed to stand for anyway? It's CAD.

>>15
Of people using Linux, 99% of them only care about apps.

>>20
I wouldn't say 99% but you are right.

dubs are not checked

>>21
I guess the question is how many people use GNU/Linux vs. the billion that use Java/Linux.

>>21
I think he's talking about Android.

I searched for an SICP copy on amazon. The prices tended to be 18-30 USD. Really? I would have expected 5-10 USD to be honest.

>>25
What's the price of XML for Dummies?

>>26

But XML is already for dummies.

>>1
you can tell by the letters

www.rolox-watches.com

GNG is pronounced 'Gung'.

GNAA

>>33
Nice dubs bro xD

no need for people to check dubs anymore as dubs can now check themselves
the shitposting industry is going to be automated and you'll need to get into a different field to put food on the table

>>33
Only a handful of people have obtained the self-chucking dubs prototype. Please don't make life hard for the remaining dubs that require an audience.

Did you just redpill me on GNU?

>>34
Don't be silly, it's open source.

>>33
The site says GNG is pronounced GOING. Going around in circles around Stallman with logic.

>>2
"GPL is a license, not a software."

GPL'd Software is in fact SOFTWARE.
i.e. GPL Software = GPL'D software.
Nitpicking things like this show that instead of actually attacking the points being made, you resort to the picking of dust off the blinds. Counter the evidence and references provided on the site (logical paradoxes and lies), not small grammar issues which aren't even issues in the first place (everyone knows that when someone says GPL software, they mean Software that has been GPL'd).

Time to learn boolean logic.

Stallman started working heavily on Free software in 1984. George Orwell's book is called 1984. Coincidence? GNU is full of double speak (you may charge a fee for software, but you may not charge any fee). Doublespeak... Moving the goal posts. You can charge for the charging of the software, but not the software. You can rent the software electricity that gets sent over a connection, but you can't rent the software.

Stalllman's lectures can be digitally replicated the same as MIT open courseware, Free of charge and speech - but if this were the case stallman couldn't make any money. Therefore it's okay to charge fees for speech (on cruise ships) but not okay to charge money for software, since speech can be replicated with a digital camera and microphone which stallman doesn't have, since he cannot buy from Amazon since it is evil (see gng website for quote at bottom of page). Books can also be replicated, so like a Vegan who throws out all his leather jackets since they are made from animals, stallman would have to throw away all his books that he owns since they can be easily replicated just like software using something called PDF files or HTML - or open office documents - therefore owning books that are glued together and copyright is the same as a vegan owning leather coats and continually buying more leather coats made from Cows (or gnus).

GNGNG Going Going Going.

Going now.

>>13
What moron would use GPL'd code when they could use the exact same code MIT'd?

He makes some good points, but comes off as a crazy person due to his presentation style

He makes crazy person points, because he's crazy.