GNU+Linux does not have Visual Studio

I thought people said this was the best OS to develop on.

>>15
I'm still on VS 2010 at work. It not completely terrible as a text editor, but as an IDE it is shit. Intellesense is always misscanning a header and saying that there are errors when there are none, and rescanning the project does not help. That's excusing the immense amount of time it takes to scan. And why can't it work properly with MFC? Sure, MFC is a bloated spaghetti plate, but why can't Microsoft even test it against their own software? On the upside, it isn't too bad handling the STL. The compiler is pretty bad too. Why is there no full C99 support? Microsoft, it's been fifteen years! They claim that that's because it's a C++ compiler with incidental support for plain C, but that's bullshit because they can't even implement C++11 properly (not that they would issue an update for 2010 anyway).

I wish they would stop focusing on C# so much. Who even uses it? No one I've ever met that didn't work for Microsoft or Novell, and now that that shilling Mixican is gone, not there. Though with Oracle strangling Java, ENTERPRISE might make a mass migration.

At least they've finally added git support. Team Foundation Server is an annoying pain in the ass.