Why browsers are bloated

https://github.com/WebKit/webkit/blob/master/Source/WebCore/platform/Scrollbar.cpp
https://github.com/WebKit/webkit/blob/master/Source/WebCore/platform/win/ScrollbarThemeWin.cpp
Let's reinvent the fucking scrollbar, which every goddamn platform with a UI already has, and make it behave subtly different from the native one!

Right-click a native scrollbar in some other app:
- Scroll Here
- Top
- Bottom
- Page Up
- Page Down
- Scroll Up
- Scroll Down

Right-click a scrollbar in Chrome:
- Back
- Forward
- Reload
- Save As...
...

Right-click a scrollbar in Firefox and Opera:
Absolutely fucking nothing happens!

What the fuck!? How did these terminally retarded idiots get involved in creating one of the most important pieces of software to the average user?

>>965
No, sir/madam, you are the idiot. Software doesn't feel slow, and consumes pennies worth of memory and disk space. Where's the waste, you dipshit?

Fuck you if you're a poor nigger with a 386 trying to run modern software. Your problems aren't relevant in the world anymore.

I run large programs on my workstation, and I inevitably hit any limitation that fuckheads like you put in. Software that comes from "I want to write simple, stupid, fixed-array based BULLSHIT because I'm too FUCKING STUPID of a programmer to write COMPETENT software that can PERFORM UNDER SCALE" is broken, and comes from retarded brains like yourself who need to die.

I will fucking strangle you with my bare hands if I ever see you in person, you shitfucking asshole, because you are a direct enemy of computers not getting in my fucking way and doing ACTUAL WORK, not the fucking masturbatory uselessness you and your like shit upon the world.

>>965

Ooh, look at my japanime reference at how smart I think I am!

You don't even understand the concept of "waste". No money is being wasted, and no human time is being wasted, so this is absolutely nothing like the Toyota example.

Any system that's built as "waste-free" as possible will always be the most brittle way to build it. Would you like a hydroelectric dam built next to your house not to waste concrete, and be exactly the thickness which can withstand observed pressures? Any more would be wasteful, right?

It's the same thing with software. You make it not have "waste", and it falls on its face when you try to push it harder. While the rest of the word considers anti-fragility, you explicitly pursue anti-robustness, because robustness happens to use free computational resources.