Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

I wonder what happened to him.....

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-23 3:50

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-24 19:31

>>40
Not this (atheist/theist | white/black | liberal/conservative) shit again. Why don't you two fuck already?

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-24 20:19

>>36
They cant be equated with each other.

I don't want lisp being a beaner language either.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-24 22:00

>>41

Who said anything about liberals or whatever? I'm not part of the cockrub duo here.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-25 6:35

>>42
Esperanto is the most beautiful and simple of the generally-applicable languages, yet almost no one uses it and it's destined for obscurity as the general populace keeps using C (Latin) in the form of its many derivatives, the most popular of which is C++ (English) - a crazy, monstrously huge and complex heir to the beauty (yet not as simple as that of Lisp/Esperanto) of C (Latin).

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-25 7:58

So what do you think happened to him?

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-26 1:08

>>44
The aim of Newspeak is to remove all shades of meaning from language, leaving simple concepts (pleasure and pain, happiness and sadness, goodthink and crimethink) that reinforce the total dominance of the State. Newspeak root words serve as both nouns and verbs, further reducing the total number of words; for example, "think" is both a noun and verb, so the word thought is not required and can be abolished. The party also intends that Newspeak be spoken in staccato rhythms with syllables that are easy to pronounce. This will make speech more automatic and unconscious and reduce the likelihood of thought. (See duckspeak.)

In addition, words with negative meanings are removed as redundant, so "bad" becomes "ungood". Words with comparative and superlative meanings are also simplified, so "better" becomes "gooder", and "best" becomes "goodest". Intensifiers can be added, so "great" became "plusgood", and "excellent" and "splendid" become "doubleplusgood". This ambiguity between comparative/superlative forms and intensified forms is one of the few examples of ambiguity in Newspeak.

Adjectives are formed by adding the suffix "-ful" to a root word (e.g., "goodthinkful", orthodox in thought), and adverbs by adding "-wise" ("goodthinkwise", in an orthodox manner).

This would, of course, not prevent heretical statements such as "Big Brother is ungood," but not only would this statement sound absurd in the ears of the politically orthodox, it would also be impossible to understand exactly what the statement means since all concepts and words that can be used to argue against Big Brother would be eradicated from the language.

Some of the constructions in Newspeak, such as "ungood," are characteristic of agglutinative languages, although foreign to English. It is possible that Orwell modeled aspects of Newspeak on Esperanto; for example, "ungood" is constructed similarly to the Esperanto word malbona. Orwell had been exposed to Esperanto in 1927 when living in Paris with his aunt Ellen Kate Limouzin and her husband Eugène Lanti, a prominent Esperantist and International Communist.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-26 12:35

>>46
Orwell didn't realize that Newspeak is exactly how the Japanese language works.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List