Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Do you question your own code shortly after you wrote it?

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-05 21:36

Do you question your code shortly after you wrote it? I find myself questioning everything I have written weeks, even days after I have written it! I often contemplate rewriting everything. I wonder if this is normal behaviour or if I am just too worried about my code being shit instead of continuing on with projects before I just get worried and start everything over?

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-07 17:02

>>37
http://www.forbes.com/sites/tomiogeron/2013/08/08/with-6m-in-new-funding-max-levchins-glow-app-helps-women-get-pregnant/
Glow uses machine learning to anonymously analyze 9 to 15 data points per day from users with the aim of providing more accurate recommendations for everyone using the app
love how "machine learning" became the next marketing buzzword.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-07 17:21

>>41

"What is predictive analytics?

Predictive analytics is more complex and requires advanced skills in engineering, coming from diverse backgrounds in artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, advanced mathematics, and advanced statistics and one could argue, this is a sub-segment of the business intelligence market."

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-07 22:24

This thread seems eerily familiar. I was sure I saw this exact thread months ago and replied to it.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-07 23:16

>>43
Precognitive dream. I have gotten a few related to /prog/.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-08 4:27

>>44
You're not alone.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-08 8:33

>>43
>>44
>>45
aren't you just thinking of stupid shit to post then forgetting YOU posted it?

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-08 8:34

>>46
No, because this thread was made a few days ago, and I remember replying to it (or one almost exactly like this) 3 or more months ago.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-08 11:30

>>46
optimise your quotes

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-14 5:11

>>47
OP Here I can tell you this is not copypasta.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-14 14:57

>>46
It has happened to me, I'm sure. I just don't remember it.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-14 17:59

>>49
It will be.

Name: yoda 2014-05-15 5:00

>>49
It will be.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-16 23:10

This is not a very accepting thread

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-16 23:46

>>53
Sometimes it's hard to thumb the needle but don't worry, you'll get it. Try licking the thread again and twisting it.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-18 21:10

>>54
You're mom licks my thread lol.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-22 15:40

wew

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-22 16:17

>>56
xD

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-24 21:20

>>57
:p

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-24 23:38

>>1

Yes. It's not a bad thing. Any programmer worth his salt will suffer with this, but also know how to move on.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-25 1:02

>>59
his
Their*

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-25 1:08

>>60
List all the female programmers you know that are worth their salt and are currently alive.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-25 1:42

>>61
There is no standard for programming quality, fuck off with your enterprise shit. We like the authors of SICP as computer scientists, not programmers. Probably only programmer that has any salt of worth is tdavis. A male but not an atheist virgin male like you, you genetic inferior.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-25 1:48

>>62
Can't you see ``worth its salt'' is extremely vague to be considered a standard? I'm not considering any kind of standard for programming quality other than not being fucking Leah.

Now, can you list the female programmers/computer scientists you know that can do something other than pull node.js apps out of their ass. If you can't, you have no right to make the correction on >>60, as you failed to provide an example that ensures the need of using ``their'' instead of ``his''.

I've slept with many Touhous and YHWH is the light that shines upon my path. Fuck you, nigger.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-25 1:54

>>62
It's not that hard to judge programs. Some aspects to consider:
+ Brevity. All things being equal (e.g. and especially understandability), a more brief program is preferable.
+ Efficiency of execution. All things being equal, a more efficient program is preferable.
+ Understandability. All things being equal, a more understandable program is preferable.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-25 2:01

>>63
Unlike you, I don't waste my time following other ``programmers'' and instead focus my time on programming. You can fuck off with your elementary school competitions and go back to 4chan as you proved yourself to be quite like them virgin autistic loser males, faggot autist.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-25 2:04

>>63
It has nothing about being a ``need'' as being technically correct. Did you fail middle school english, sandnigger?

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-25 2:27

I mena haskell.

Name: Not >>63 2014-05-25 2:49

>>65
WILL YOU STOP THE FUCKING REDIRECTIONS ALREADY, FAGCUNT?

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-25 13:30

>>65-66
There is no point in saying ``his vagina''. Replacing ``her vagina'' with ``their vagina'' (singular) is stupid, and so is replacing the his in ``any programmer worth his salt'' with ``their''.

You still have to provide a example for why your 66being technically correct99 makes sense in this context.

For the record, I just slept with the Lunarian mistress of Eientei. What have you losers ever achieved in your life, other than being neurotypical Javascript coders?

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-25 13:59

Lain is a good programmer, worth everyone's salt.

I didn't sleep with her, but I kissed her once.

Name: >>63,69 2014-05-25 14:01

>>70
Now that's an example I didn't consider. You're right.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-25 14:20

Faggots.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-25 15:03

>>60
*his

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-25 16:48

"Man" is masculine in a lot of European languages (German, Russian, etc.) for a reason. Even English, which doesn't have genders, has the word man mean both "male human" and "human", but not "female human".
Only men are truly human in that they are capable of higher thought, of willful acts, of having morals and rational judgement. Women are mostly incapable or reluctant to exercise those qualities. A woman never knows why something should or shouldn't be done, she is a lot happier following a man's lead. This is because women are generally childlike and immature, which facilitates their communication with children (which it is their function to produce and raise). A woman is a human in a middle stage of development between child and fully-grown, mature man.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-25 17:49

>>74
this is what my minimal interaction with women throughout my whole life has taught me

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-25 18:13

>>75
Please refrain from quoting what hasn't been said.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-25 20:04

this is what my minimal interaction with women throughout my whole life has taught me

>>76

he is clearly quoting >>78, looks like he can see the future

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-25 20:25

>>78
you're not funny

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-25 20:32

>>77

Males are more "in your face" stupid and obnoxious, women tend to back-stabbing and bullshitting
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode + RSS -