Analysis of Biden-Trump Debate

Point 1: Supreme court nomination
Trump: Advertised the qualities of candidate.
Biden:Pointed out the political implications of Amy Barett,
Affordable care act and Supreme court influence on legislation.
Trump: Claims its socialist policy, denies amount of americans with
pre-existing conditions.
Biden: Claims private insurance will remain, Obamacare will be expanded without forced switching.
Trump:Socialist healthcare(repeated claims)
Biden:pre-existing conditions are bad, we're going to remove them.
Also links COVID patients to pre-existing conditions.
Trump: VA leads to 308k veterans dying, blames Biden for it.
Biden:+1

>>8
Even daily Reichstag fires would be justified as "riot is the language of the unheard", with full support of the media.
Its likely to be some sort of internal coup and free reign for paramilitaries like Latin American countries when republics collapse to dictatorships. The opposition will be able to gather lots of support from mainstream and elite - a crackdown from the top wouldn't work.
If Trump denies election results(Biden leads in the polls),
the refusal to transition will be justified by his political cliques and paramilitary groups, but as they contest the law they discredit the
concept of free elections and cement the idea of 'political strength' as sole determination of valid leadership (aka "Strong Leader we need" mentality), which plays right into a scenario of patriotic revival,
interpreted as white supremacist coup and fascism by the left:
the confrontation will lead to open civil conflict on the contested
areas where Biden and Trump claim political power:
A situation of "Dual powers" that is a direct precursor to civil war,
where local areas pledge their allegiance to specific party and
refuse authority of unified republic. Its clear this is powderkeg
of political anger and mutual hate brewing when "authority" is shifted
towards "moral power" from legislative and bureaucratic systems,
therefore enabling charismatic leadership and popular movements to
assert direct control over political process - gaining territory
and influence on specific localities(like e.g. CHAZ autonomous zone and various religious compounds) where their power is not legalized
but accepted as true authority by other means(religion, ideology,etc).

Redditors are currently deciphering the meaning and context of "Stand by"(Trump) and "inshallah"(Biden), as if they're now part of some historical event.
>>11 You have no idea what going on twitter, youtube, reddit, blogs are not treating it as run-of-mill presidential debate, its getting
very polarized with both sides claiming victory and dog-whistling from opponents. There now people speaking on such boring topics "Which side the military will be on in case of contested elections" and "Will Trump use militias to remain in power" as if there real risk such scenarios develop after elections.