Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Debate me?

Name: Kevin Logan 2018-11-16 1:26

Lots of lefty shit going around on this site. Care to prove your 'ideas' in the arena of debate? Then try me ITT.

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-16 2:52

Pretty much all lefty talking points and positions can be destroyed or annihilated simply by stating "if you can't stand the heat stay out of the kitchen".

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-16 6:39

>>2
In other words, "if you can't cope with murder, don't witness us committing it."

Now it makes sense! Murder is cool!

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-16 6:43

>>3
if you can't cope with murder, don't witness us committing it
This is a correct position.
Murder is cool!
This not so much.

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-16 8:30

>>4
Flawed logic yields idiots who will draw that conclusion. Your anti-lefty saying is extremely flawed for that reason. Just figured I'd draw a parallel to highlight that. Not that I disagree with your stance, just the saying you used.

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-16 9:12

>>5
Just figured I'd draw a parallel
Found your problem. If you really noticed flaws in the logic you would have explicitly pointed them out rather than "draw[ing] a[n alleged] parallel" to avoid stating anything concrete.

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-16 9:17

not >>5 but parallel is pretty obvious: bad things don't stop being bad when you ignore them

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-16 9:33

>>7
But if you get out of a hot kitchen because you can't stand the heat, then you will no longer be hot. It feels unreal that I have to spell this out for you.......

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-16 10:12

>>8
that would make sense as an argument for a libertarian position, not modern american conservatism. modern conservatism doesn't just happen, it intrudes on your're are life with everything from economic protectionism to war on drugs

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-16 11:32

>>6
Sometimes taking the scenic route causes less abrasion in conversation. Unless you'd like me to go straight to "you're stupid for using that useless phrase, dumbass."

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-16 11:36

>>10
Either way you would just be engaging in evasive babbling instead of actually pointing out any flaws you are alleging so that your allegations can be directly critiqued.

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-16 11:38

>>11
But I did point out the flaws... By drawing a parallel. If you're having difficulty understanding the purpose of parallels, maybe we should have a little comprehension course set up for you.

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-16 11:40

>>12
So how come this "parallel" was debunked effortlessly back in post >>8? Asking for a friend.....

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-16 11:43

>>13
Lol, that isn't debunking. We'll add that to the course syllabus for ya, buddy.

PS refer to >>7 if you wanna use past replies as your comeback source. Easy to talk in circles.

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-16 11:57

>>12
But I did point out the flaws... By drawing a parallel
No you just went on a sarcastic rant about how murder was good, even though that conveniently has nothing to do with heat or kitchens.

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-16 12:00

>>15
Heat/kitchens was also a parallel. Literally the same type of argument.

Name: Anonymous 2018-11-16 13:28

So women should get back in the heat and make me a sandwich.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List