Deplatforming is unintentionally accelerationist

Forces people to realizes how cucked surface internet is. All controversial content will eventually migrate onto darknets.
Darknets will grow eventually to create an alternative platform to entire Internet and censorship won't be able to stop it.
I'd call it Shadow Internet: like a shadow economy, it will grow from current needs and crowds seeking anonymity/free speech.

Yes. I got banned from Facebook and Youtube for saying that Russians are subhuman genetic garbage.

Proof it's unintentional?

Darknets will grow eventually to create an alternative platform to entire Internet and censorship won't be able to stop it.

you overestimate normalfags. only people who already were using darknet would use it. normalfags won't use it, which defeats the whole point of political advocacy. if it's not easily accessible on Facebook or Google, then it's not worth knowing about (to all but those who would have sought the taboo speech eventually in any case). deplatforming works.

accelerationism is just capitalist fantasy

the only thing accelerating is our impending doom thanks to resource depletion, overpopulation, and pollution

Deplatforming fascists is useless if your end goal isn't destroying the State.

>>5
Oh boo hoo. Humans and all other mammals are clearly a mistake, our collective doom is a boon for more perfect life forms such as trees.

>>7
don't disrespect trees you modernist cuck

>>5

accelerationism is just capitalist fantasy

lmao clueless
have you looked at the cvs of the ccru

the only thing accelerating is our impending doom thanks to resource depletion, overpopulation, and pollution

neurotic ecofaggot donnie darko

ugly internet gremlins who think experimental ideological frontiers are safe places for them are going to be in for a rude awakening when the crop comes in

you are working on the plantation to build the new ivory pyramid for the same lizard people that slink through the slimy halls of every university and NGO

speaking with a colleague...

setting: some time had elapsed since the height of the most recent bout of cryptomania and every illiterate with a quota to fill began to speak of the blockchain

how many semen crusted forum posts built upon ron paul anime substrate (read: spores) were burnt like a wicker man for janice the 56 year old cubicle crawler to breathlessly huff about blockchain? a thousand ships launched across cyberspace to buoy the ice in her XL liquid sugar coffee soda.

outcome: another contract to a savvier business for another set of pointless temple charms and a 40,000 dollar golden toilet seat database

>>3
Its unintentional because its done from reactive grounds to clean the platform from "non-PC" content. Though i think deep cover accelerationists are using SJW tactics to do their bidding in other areas.

>>4

you overestimate normalfags. only people who already were using darknet would use it

That only the early stages. A technology first adopters are necessary fringe elements, especially in case of anonymization. Only 3 major darknets exist right now, imagine a future with several dozen of them.

>>13
TOR has been around since 2002. It’s nearly as old as the consumer internet itself. If it were going to reach critical mass, it already would have by now.

Also normalfags are used to interfacing with social media via their phones. (<10% of people use FB or Twitter on PCs.) Normalfags aren’t going to break out of this habit. This is a huge problem for darknet as a social media platform because app stores (Apple and Alphabet) will just delete the darknet client applications the same way they deleted Gab and Alex Jones. You’d have to convince people to only use Android and allow installation from unknown sources (a feature which could be removed at any time).

There are just too many hurdles for a normalfag to jump through. It won’t get any easier in the future as Big Tech makes their products more like walled gardens.

>>8
Saying trees are a more perfect lifeform isn't disrespectful you massive autist.

Also the days of the free internet are over. >>14 is right soon "devices" of all types won't be customizable in any way and the internet itself will be like an even shittier version of cable. There's literally no way this won't happen.