Vaxxer: If you don't vaccinate you're endangering yourself and other Anti-Vaxxer:I don't want to inject known poisons into my body Vaxxer: You have no other choice. Vaxxer: Vaccines are safe and effective. Vaxxer: So safe, in fact they need to be mandatory. Vaxxer: We need herd immunity, otherwise vaccines don't work.
Name:
Anonymous2018-09-12 6:10
I want to hear more from the based anti-vaxxer
Name:
Anonymous2018-09-12 6:52
*Anti-Vaxxer dies from smallpox*
Name:
Anonymous2018-09-12 6:54
>>3 Suppose you have one vaccine from ChemiCorp that causes cancer, and smallpox doesn't exist. Would you say you need to trust ChemiCorp and its vaccine because its the only option vs death?
>>5 Corporations will feed you lead and mercury for profit and won't even blink.
Name:
Anonymous2018-09-12 7:01
>>7 Then get a vaccine that doesn't have lead or mercury in it. Not rocket science is it
Name:
Anonymous2018-09-12 7:12
>>8 1.I don't mention that vaccines are filled with lead and mercury. I said corporations will feed you anything for profit regardless of toxicity. 2.There is no alternative vaccine without the toxic components, you can't examine the vaccines, you can't even sue the vaccine makers(google Vaccine court), you can't make your own vaccine.
Name:
Anonymous2018-09-12 7:18
>>9 How do you even know there are toxic components if you supposedly can't examine the vaccines?
Name:
Anonymous2018-09-12 7:31
Chance of being permanently hospitalized due to lack of vaccine is greater than chance of having quality of life significantly decreased due to vaccine. Europe learned this and now we have much lower medical costs than 'murka.
Name:
Anonymous2018-09-12 7:31
>>10 Because you conflate two things. 1.The vaccine i'm getting and want to examine. I only know what the manufacturer claims. 2.Vaccines in general, which were documented to have toxic chemicals and substances harmful to animals.
Chance of being permanently hospitalized due to lack of vaccine is greater than chance of having quality of life significantly decreased due to vaccine.
Where can you find "quality of life" studies which examine this with a vaccinated control group? What facts you based this on?
How does "accumulating in blood" relate to permanent brain damage?
Name:
Anonymous2018-09-12 8:05
Many toxins are rapidly eliminated by the body. It doesn't mean they don't leave damage.
Name:
Anonymous2018-09-12 8:07
ethylmercury is mostly harmless, it's methylmercury you should be worried about. literally just eating a can of tuna is an order of magnitude more dangerous than getting vaccinated
Name:
Anonymous2018-09-12 8:08
>>22 I don't inject tuna into my bloodstream bypassing all body defenses.
as you can see, it is usually measured in percentages, with IV route being close to 100%. you can probably find specifics about mercury on pubmed, I don't have them handy. now, here's the thing about orders of magnitude: even if oral route had 1% bioavailability and IV had 100%, you'd still get more from tuna.
I wouldn't trust anything that swims in humanity collective chemical dump, but why does it(the idea that X gives you more mercury than Y) mean that this somehow makes vaccines less evil? For example if i give you two apples both poisoned with cyanide, one with 4000mg and other with 100mg, does it make sense to eat even one apple?
>>30 toxicity is dependent on dose you literal fucking retard. apples actually contain cyanide, and tomatoes contain nicotine - both strongly poisonous. yet you don't die while eating them
this thread reminds of why arguing with FrozenAnus is stupid
Name:
Anonymous2018-09-12 9:46
Nightshades besides nicotine, also contain chaconine, solanine and tomatine. It makes sense to at least reduce these alkaloids, esp. tomato sauce which is concentrated form(that also one of most fructose-heavy foods.
Name:
Anonymous2018-09-12 9:48
next thing your're are going to tell me is that you fear tomato brain damage
Name:
Anonymous2018-09-12 9:50
>>37 I don't fear something you can easily avoid. People don't force you to inject tomato sauce into your veins.