proof of global warming

https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs_v3/

see how the graph goes up instead of staying flat

HOLY SHIT! Is this evidence of the fabled greenhouse eff- zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

nvm i misunderstodd the graph, its' not absolute temperature it's (((anomaly)))

>>1
The dispute isn't whether temperatures are rising, it's whether (or really, to what extent) they're caused by human activity.

>>4
the graph doesn't even show temperature rising

LOL the axis only goes down to 1880? Do you realize that there was a temperature minimum in the XVIII century, which was kind of the reason Napoleon's army got freezed in 1812? So rising temperatures from 1880 until now are only to be expected?

>>4
Hey, get this. From a climate alarmist site itself:

Consumption of vegetation by animals & microbes accounts for about 220 gigatonnes of CO2 per year. Respiration by vegetation emits around 220 gigatonnes. The ocean releases about 332 gigatonnes. In contrast, when you combine the effect of fossil fuel burning and changes in land use, human CO2 emissions are only around 29 gigatonnes per year.

So humanity produces only 29, nature releases 550, but when the carbon dioxide levels rise it's definitely the human fault! Talk about the straw that broke the camel's back. This is even funnier than blaming global warming on cow farts.

https://www.skepticalscience.com/human-co2-smaller-than-natural-emissions-intermediate.htm

It's all the excess body heat from having too many people. The only way to stop global warming is through sustained nuclear war, or perhaps something similar to the Chicxulub asteroid strike.

Simple solution to global warming: instead of turning on the heat in the winter, turn your window A/C units inside out. That way, it heats your home while cooling the outside.

This might sound like a crazy idea, but I think that if we calculated the total surface area of the Earth that's urbanized or otherwise built upon by humans and painted every rooftop, every square and and every sidewalk white, we would have a substantial increase in the amount of energy reflected back into space versus the amount of energy absorbed by the Earth, perhaps just enough to slow global warming down while we work on developing alternative fuel sources to replace oil and gas.

>>9
You racist.

>>10
You're right, we could also get rid of the dark-skinned people because they absorb solar energy while pale-skinned people reflect it.

>>1

Graph only goes back to 1996
Doesn't go back 12,000 years
Doesn't show that it was 5 degrees hotter during Roman times

>>8
That's actually simple enough that it might work.