Cleanliness or Overly-Cleanliness?

The latter. People are too overly-clean these days. I like to live in moldy damp conditions but today my landlord said it was "wrong". When did Western civilization go down this rotten path towards overly-cleanliness?

Modern sanitation is a good thing. The only problem with it is that it leaves the human immune system untrained.

>>2
So it's a good thing except that it weakens and ultimately kills you? Yikes..... I wouldn't want to know what you consider bad.........

>>3
Nobody has so far died from using modern sanitation in the way that it's supposed to be used. American views on cleanliness on the other hand are very self detrimental. American parents don't let their kids play in the dirt or explore too far away from their house. As a result, their immune system never fully develops the way it should.

>>4
Sounds like Americans are the victims of Overly-Cleanliness.

>>5
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hygiene_hypothesis

consider that your ancestors 0-10,000 years ago regularly ate worms and shit out of the dirt covered in mold and animal shit

>>7
Consider that they also had a life expectancy of 25.

>>8
No, you are wrong. The average life expectancy was low due to all the people who died in childbirth. If you made it through infanthood, you were likely to live to a ripe old age unencumbered by autism or faggotry. That's how it goes when the weak are killed off at birth. It's called Natural Selection, look it up some time.

>>9
Yeah, and you could still die of a tooth infection, or an infected laceration, or a broken bone, or food poisoning, etc.

Thanks but no thanks.

Hail dubs

>>10
Um, actually you are wrong? People back then rarely died from infections that our current crop of weak embarrassments to nature are susceptible to dying from. That is because the weak died at birth, while the strong could only thrive prior to expiring at an old age.