Hahaha

Like I said, this whole invader-worship thing is all about increasing public spending and getting more budget cuts. Most of the immigrants are uneducated, unemployable and will go straight to a life of welfare parasitism, but from the government officials' point of view, this is actually good because then the welfare agencies will get more monies!

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/10/28/leak-81-per-cent-migrants-germany-unskilled-government-predicts-400000-new-welfare-claimants/

As the document explains, the sheer number of new unemployment benefit applications that will need processing and managing means the agency will have to employ 3,500 new staff.

The new claimants and the staff come with a cost, estimated to stand at €855 million next year (£620 million) in addition to the €35 billion already budgeted for 2016. The additional cost includes €640 million for benefit payments and €65 million for new staff — convenient empire building for the agency at a time of national crisis.

Similar employment programmes exist in European basket-case Sweden, where the national migration agency is growing at a rate of 100 employees a month – many of which are freshly arrived migrants.

Europe is literally getting decimated by Muslim hordes, yet the Marxist bureaucrats rub their hands for the ever-increasing welfare spending. And when the budget buckles and there's no more money to pay benefits, these millions of barbarians will turn their fists towards the bleeding-heart useful idiots who welcomed them as "refugees"! This would be so funny if it wasn't so sad.

Europe is literally getting decimated by Muslim hordes

That's odd, because it seems like the population is going up.

>>2
Because Muslims are breeding like cockroaches.

Two chemical signals are essential in all cockroach sexual behavioral sequences: the sex pheromone released by one partner, generally the female (for long distance attraction), and an aphrodisiac sex pheromone produced exclusively by male tergal glands (for female mounting and tergal contact or “feeding” behavior). Unlike the other cockroach groups, the males of the Oxyhaloinae species produce both chemical signals: the pheromone and the aphrodisiac. The occurrence of three patterns of mating behavior (A, B, and C), the production of male sex pheromones, and the existence in the male of developed sternal and tergal glands in seven related Oxyhaloinae species, make these cockroaches a useful model for studying the evolution of mating behavior patterns. The various types of mating behavior were not classified in the previous studies by Roth and Barth. In this report, they have been named type A (female in upper position), B (male in upper position), and C (male and female end to end). In type A mating, the male tergal glands, which are licked by the females, are well developed, whereas in types B and C, there is no licking of the male's tergal secretion by the females and the tergal glands are much less developed; the aphrodisiacs secreted by the tergal glands may no longer act in this case through contact chemoreception, but through an olfactory process involving volatile components. One common sex pheromone component seems to be acetoin. I suggest that the mating behavior tends from A toward B and C during the evolutionary process with a concomitant regression of the tergal glands and changes in the aphrodisiac emission levels. The mating behavioral sequences of cockroaches (Dictyoptera) and crickets (Orthoptera) show a striking degree of similarity and are probably examples of convergent evolution.

>>1
Don't be silly, welfare spending circles straight back around to the government while lifting the economic base

ie. spending on welfare is one of the few things that doesn't waste government moneys [hence we are all taught to hate it]

I do believe i read that for every dollar of welfare released, the government collects one dollar and ten cents tax in the next year

i think equiv to: GDP is raised by 1/10 x%, where x is the percent GDP spent on welfare

There is a funny/counter-intuitive thing where giving (too much) welfare "may" make things more expensive -> making people effectively poorer again (by way of everyone being a little richer)

[increased finance] -> [increased spending // demand] -> [increased price // supply co-ef] -> [increased supply // demand co-ef]

[increased price] is acceptable as a Short-term Measure to quell spikes in demand, (preventing sell-out // price sky-rocket by scalpers) but generally demand is good for business

economies of scale should kick in @[increased supply] making the actual item Cheaper to Produce!

[lowered price] -> [increased -relative to product- finance] + [increased -residual- finance]

Like I said, this whole newness-worship thing is all about increasing public spending and getting less bang. Most of the products are worthless second-hand and will go straight to a life of planned obsolescence resource parasitism and landfill fodder, but from the government officials' point of view, this is actually good because then the taxation agencies will get more monies!

Kinda funny trying to convince people to buy things, then being grumpy that the thing you sold is still worth something afterwards..

It's garage-sale season in germany!

>>1
I have a solution to this problem. We need more government programs to help train these poor, helpless, suffering African and Arab refugees how to program in java script.

>>13
Most of them won't work even in Javascript, because they didn't come all this way to work, they came to receive free cars and apartments from German taxpayers.

increasing public spending and getting more budget cuts

wut

>>15
Welfare benefits are public spending. As in, from the state budget. As in, an opportunity for corruption.