Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

lounge dilemma

Name: Anonymous 2014-10-10 0:09

Terrorists are bad. They plan things in secret and kill people, sabotage the internet, and steal peoples money via some shaky claim to authority.
If a terrorist says one thing and does another, that's not so bad for a terrorist... they could do worse than lie..
Words alone cannot amount to terrorism, though words can tell of routine terrorist acts, like mass surveillance.

In theory, having a government should be a good thing..
They should be quite happy to tell us everything they do, and everything they do should easily stand up to public scrutiny, because the public en masse should've been well involved and informed long before it got halfway to the beginning of being implemented..

Name: RedCream 2014-10-10 0:21

I fell asleep at the 8th word. I admit my roal, but soa should you: You induce narcoalepsy.

Name: Anonymous 2014-10-10 1:16

even the logistics of 20-60 nations cooperating against 10-30,000 come 30-60,000, in the middle of a civil war, is nightmarish

and then you wonder about all the prior covert operations..

You've made it impossible for me to allow you to go in there...

Name: Anonymous 2014-10-10 1:53

Jus_ad_bellum
The principle of right authority suggests that a war is just only if waged by a legitimate authority.
-Questionable

According to the principle of right intention, the aim of war must not be to pursue narrowly defined national interests, but rather to re-establish a just peace.
-Multi-national interests

According to this principle, there must be good grounds for believing that aims of the just war are achievable.
-Barely addresses the symptoms

The principle of last resort stipulates that all non-violent options must first be exhausted before the use of force can be justified.
-Refusal to negotiate

Name: Anonymous 2014-10-10 2:36

I agree that the U.S. has nothing really to negotiate, anything it could it won't (eg. halting of foreign interferences)

Name: Anonymous 2014-10-10 2:43

But you don't see chinamen flying planes into buildings in capetown
For all i know, it would take a hell of a lot of motivation...

Name: Anonymous 2014-10-10 4:00

600,000 (?) died in the WMD-Ruse of Iraq...

Now their weapon is some silly idea [specifics more or less censored, probably for national security purposes *see [] ]

Name: Anonymous 2014-10-10 4:25

The War on Ideas of Mass Destruction ??
"We're going to war on anyone who thinks about war.... or anything else for that matter!"

Name: Anonymous 2014-10-10 4:49

IMD #1 Telling the truth can be illegal

Breach of fundamental law ^^

Name: Anonymous 2014-10-10 11:39

Could you have thought of a greater insult to the entire legal system?

Name: RedCream 2014-10-10 18:54

>>4
Jus_ad_bellum

Moar liek 'jus ad snorem', amirite? I read about 4 moar words of the oariginal poasting, and I fell asleep soa fast that I cracked my head on the table on the way down.

GREEN FOAMY FILTH

Name: Anonymous 2014-10-11 0:15

It's already a shambles...
People say Pauline Hanson was bad, but at least she was Honest

Pretty far out having a government that has such a poor understanding of the most basic principle of law

Name: Anonymous 2014-10-11 0:26

And pretty convenient that soon after snowden we have this `National Security` thing again...

Name: Anonymous 2014-10-11 0:34

I'm tempted to say you're no longer legal either..

Name: Anonymous 2014-10-11 0:40

And you know what we do with illegal governments.... =)

Name: Anonymous 2014-10-13 5:40

AUSTRALIA will be billed by the US military for many of the missiles and other bombs RAAF jet fighters drop in the campaign against Islamic State terrorists.

US-supplied smart-guided weapons fitted to Australia’s Super Hornets can range in price from less than $70,000 to more than $650,000 each.

Name: Anonymous 2014-10-13 5:47

So about the same as fixing a couple of refugee's houses?

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List