Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

The Human Velocipede

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-04 6:57

Citizens, lend me your ears, for we have been grievously hoodwinked! We stand passive on the precipice of a cultural decay, blind to the grand illusion rolling through our cobbled streets. I speak, of course, of that great modern heresy: the so-called "bi-cyclical."Look upon it and weep! They dare to market this absurd skeletal frame as the next evolution of transit, a sleek alternative to our noble equine companions. Do not be deceived by the slick talk of "efficiency" and "progress." What we are witnessing is nothing short of a coordinated, horseless horse deception—a tragic, mechanical masquerade.The Anatomy of the Soulless Mechanical HorseTo compare a true, majestic stallion to this cold, tubular mockery is an insult to nature itself. A horse possesses a soul, a beating heart, an innate wisdom. What does this soulless mechanical horse offer?Zero Kinship: A horse knows its rider. It breathes, it feels, it shares the burden of the journey. The bi-cyclical? It is a dead thing of iron and rubber. It offers no companionship, only a rigid, indifferent frame that will gladly throw you into a ditch without a single pang of conscience.The Ignominy of the Pedal: Consider the sheer indignity demanded by these demonic wheel contraptions. To move a horse, one commands with dignity. To move these contraptions, a human being must degrade themselves into a frantic, pumping piston—legs flailing, lungs bursting, sweating profusely just to maintain balance on a razor-thin strip of rubber. You are not the master of this machine; you are its engine, its literal captive labor!A Safety Hazard Born of Hubris: A horse has eyes. It will steer you away from a cliffside; it will halt before a treacherous bog. But the demonic wheel contraption? It possesses no eyes, no instinct, no mercy. If you guide it toward a brick wall, it will violently collide with that wall, catapulting you over its handlebars with the cold, unfeeling physics of pure malice.Dismantling the Grand Illusion:Let us pull back the curtain on the great lie perpetuated by the manufacturers of these metallic monstrosities. They call it a "vehicle of freedom." I call it a rolling monument to human regression.A collection of sprockets waiting to rust.Toxic grease, synthetic oil, and the sheer exhaustion of your own thighs.Requires ridiculous tight-fitting garments and a comical styrofoam hat.Two flimsy wheels in a constant, panicked state of falling over. You are not the master of this machine; you are its engine, its literal captive labor!

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-04 19:33

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-04 19:33

Frieren: Beyond Journey's End
My Daddy Longlegs
A Little Princess Sara
Outlaw Star
Mobile Suit G Gundam
Mushi-shi
Princess Tutu
Re:Zero
Yu Yu Hakusho
Reign: the Conqueror
FLCL
Trigun
My Hero Academia
Nadia the Secret of Blue Water
Darling in the Franxxx
Fruits Basket
Grandpa and Grandma Turn Young Again
KonoSuba
Laid-Back Camp
Little Witch Academia
Magical Stage Fancy Lala
Medalist
Negative Positive Angler
Ranma 1/2
Ruri Rocks
Soil Eater
Tenchi Muyo
The Fragrant Flower Blooms With Dignity
The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya
Wolf's Rain
Zoids
Zenshuu

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-04 22:51

I personally started out in the mid 90s (I know, I was 10) learning how to code, solder etc etc and it was extremely difficult because the internet was brand new and resources were light (if you could get on at all, being 10, that was tricky for me)...so I used pocket money to buy the occasional book...most of them were crap. I eventually had two reasonably good books, a simple book on HTML and Javascript (it was one of those brightly coloured "in easy steps" books) which was enough to help me understand the source code on other peoples websites by viewing source (which was the common way to learn back then) and a really good book on C/C++ which I wish I still had but I can't remember the author or publisher (it had a boring white cover with a couple of navy blue and red stripes), it had a really good section on reverse engineering (which is a lost art).

The key point is that a lot of learned by reverse engineering other peoples work...that is not a skill that is taught because somehow reverse engineering stuff has become frowned upon. I still reverse engineer things today to help towards figuring something out and it is one of my higher paying skills.

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-05 10:35

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-05 21:46

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-05 22:49

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-05 22:52

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-07 22:02

wood fort medeval 13th century wood https://youtu.be/kwA_ijq3eSw?t=13

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-07 23:18

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-07 23:50

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-08 0:15

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-08 15:44

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-08 17:56

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-08 17:57

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-08 18:31

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-08 19:01

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-08 22:35

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-08 22:53

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-08 23:43

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-09 10:57

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-09 11:19

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-09 11:59

uggcf://nepuvir.4cyrof.bet/cby/guernq/536691638/#d536693600

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-09 12:02

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-09 14:12

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-09 14:21

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-09 21:58

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-10 3:03

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-10 3:16

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-10 5:33

magnet:?xt=urn:btih:58E437682C3066069E06DCF0BC42BFBDDA598F33&tr=http%3A%2F%2Fbt2.t-ru.org%2Fann%3Fmagnet&dn=(Power%2FSpeed%2FThrash%20Metal)%20Hellhound%20-%20Nothing%20Left%20-%202016%2C%20MP3%2C%20320%20kbps

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-10 20:13

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-10 21:41

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-11 0:20

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-11 0:55

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-11 23:47

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-12 2:47

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-12 2:51

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-12 3:29

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-12 3:31

>>536886330
>"The Feather Warrior has exposed himself infront of the other army: this is seen as a challenge or a taunt: questioning the vitality of the other side".

>"Much as the scots once did at the battle of sterling bridge"

>>536886662
Every tribal peoples do this.
He is saying
"you white people are cowards, you are afraid of the police and prison: and thus will not kill us. We, on the other hand, are not afraid of anything and will die fighting them and you: as that is who we are: the species of Man. You are hu-man: a nothing."

Aztecs and Inca did similar.

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-12 3:31

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-12 11:52

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-12 13:47

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-12 13:55

The weight was 6,647.52 pounds with dimensions of 128.5 by 56.2
inches. T

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-12 13:57

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-12 14:01

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-12 14:04

The improved device weighed 7,139 pounds, measured 147.9 by 56.2
inches, yielded 9.96 megatons (reported also as 10.0 megatons), and was es-
timated to be 99.9 percent “clean.” 68

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-12 14:06

Grams
The President opened the meeting by inquiring of me whether there was any ne-
cessity to test in the atmosphere in 1963. I described briefly the Ripple program
and said that further tests of this concept would be necessary before weaponiza-
tion could be achieved, and that the first such tests could be held next May.
Secretary Rusk said that he felt we should maintain maximum flexibility with
regard to the resumption of atmospheric testing, and make no statement that
would preclude this possibility. On the basis of these facts the President decided
that the statement announcing the end of the current atmospheric test series
would be silent on the question of possible testing in 1963. 70
This is the last publicly available record that mentions the Ripple program
by name. Seaborg’s diary makes clear that a solid four to five months of data
analysis and design work would be required for the next phase of the program
now that the basic concept had been proven sound. More significantly, further
testing would be required to develop the Ripple concept more fully and to
weaponize it.
The final Soviet atmospheric nuclear test, a 24.2 megaton “clean” de-
vice, was carried out on 25 December 1962. The completion of the U.S.
and Soviet atmospheric test series by the end of 1962 spurred new momen-
tum toward an atmospheric test ban treaty after an initial proposal in August
1962 had been shelved. Consequently, any plans for further atmospheric or
possible deep space testing by the United States were either put on hold or
cancelled outright. Because only relatively low-yield devices could be safely
tested underground, the end of atmospheric testing left the Ripple program in
limbo.
In March 1963, a general review of Operation Dominic included discus-
sion of the results of the Ripple program, albeit without mentioning it by
name:
Although the United States did not test any devices of very high yields, tests were
conducted of designs which could lead to an entire new class of U.S. weapons.
These new weapons could have relatively low weights and extremely high yields,
with the fission contribution decreased to only a few percent of the total yield,
thus greatly reducing the radioactive fallout from such weapons. The yield to
weight ratios of the new class of weapons would be more than twice that which
can now be achieved in the design of very high yield weapons using previously
developed concepts. . . . New warheads—for example, a 35 Mt warhead for our
Titan II—based on these improvements, could be stockpiled with confidence.71

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-12 14:10

Grams
standard Teller-Ulam designs. The only ICBM in the inventory dimensionally
large enough to carry a Ripple-based design was the Titan II, and even though
this class of launch vehicle was relatively new, it was already being phased out
in favor of smaller missiles such as the Minuteman. This shift, coupled with a
strategy that sought to minimize warhead size in order to maximize numbers,
also played a role in the decision to halt development. Seaborg acknowledged
as much in an appearance before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. In
attempting to assuage concerns about the LTBT’s potential effects on the vi-
ability of the nuclear deterrent, Seaborg insisted that development would not
slow down, except for “complex, multi-megaton weapons,” a clear reference to
the Ripple concept. 76 With the ban on atmospheric testing, the humanitarian
benefits of “clean” weapons disappeared from the public consciousness, and
the Department of Defense quietly terminated plans to convert the stockpile.
All existing “clean” weapons were withdrawn from service, and nowadays all
remaining weapons are “conventional.”
The success and potential of the Ripple program, as defined by exper-
imental validation and analysis, has been clearly established. The following
facts put this potential into perspective. When compared to the most modern
and powerful ballistic missile warhead in the arsenal today—the 475-kiloton
W-88—the Ripple concept offers at a minimum ten times the yield-to-weight
ratio and does it “clean.” The Ripple concept as it stood in early 1963 was
at the very beginning of its development cycle as a potential weapon system.
Given further development through testing and complete computational anal-
ysis, the Teller-Brown prediction of 50 megatons for a 6,000-pound device by
1965 may have been within reach. In today’s technological environment, af-
ter nearly 60 years of continual ICF research and petaflop computing, the
potential gains for the Ripple concept are staggerin

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-12 14:12

Grams
standard Teller-Ulam designs. The only ICBM in the inventory dimensionally
large enough to carry a Ripple-based design was the Titan II, and even though
this class of launch vehicle was relatively new, it was already being phased out
in favor of smaller missiles such as the Minuteman. This shift, coupled with a
strategy that sought to minimize warhead size in order to maximize numbers,
also played a role in the decision to halt development. Seaborg acknowledged
as much in an appearance before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. In
attempting to assuage concerns about the LTBT’s potential effects on the vi-
ability of the nuclear deterrent, Seaborg insisted that development would not
slow down, except for “complex, multi-megaton weapons,” a clear reference to
the Ripple concept. 76 With the ban on atmospheric testing, the humanitarian
benefits of “clean” weapons disappeared from the public consciousness, and
the Department of Defense quietly terminated plans to convert the stockpile.
All existing “clean” weapons were withdrawn from service, and nowadays all
remaining weapons are “conventional.”
The success and potential of the Ripple program, as defined by exper-
imental validation and analysis, has been clearly established. The following
facts put this potential into perspective. When compared to the most modern
and powerful ballistic missile warhead in the arsenal today—the 475-kiloton
W-88—the Ripple concept offers at a minimum ten times the yield-to-weight
ratio and does it “clean.” The Ripple concept as it stood in early 1963 was
at the very beginning of its development cycle as a potential weapon system.
Given further development through testing and complete computational anal-
ysis, the Teller-Brown prediction of 50 megatons for a 6,000-pound device by
1965 may have been within reach. In today’s technological environment, af-
ter nearly 60 years of continual ICF research and petaflop computing, the
potential gains for the Ripple concept are staggering.
In our conversation about where the Ripple concept stands today, Fos-
ter asked me to consider one use to which it could be ideally suited: near
earth object (NEO) deflection. The success of nuclear NEO deflection is
directly proportional to device yield and weight. The higher the yield, the
shorter lead time required for interception. The tremendous yield-to-weight
advantages of the Ripple concept over anything available is unquestionable.
Furthermore, the fact that the Ripple is “clean” increases its relative effective-
ness, as neutrons—produced in copious amounts by fusion reactions—are the
most effective mechanism for NEO deflection or destruction in the vacuum
of space. These unique characteristics might make the Ripple concept the
76. Terchek, The Making of the Test Ban Treaty, p. 39.
160
Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/jcws/article-pdf/23/2/133/1922984/jcws_a_01011.pdf by MIT Libraries user on 23 January 2022
Research Note
ideal nuclear asteroid deflection device. Would this advantage be enough to
overcome the issues associated with development of such a device in today’s
global climate? Unlike all nuclear explosive devices before or after, the Ripple
concept came out of the quest for clean energy, and it is perhaps only fitting
that its best use would be a peaceful one.

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-12 14:12

Name: Anonymous 2026-06-13 1:27


Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List