Why liberalism is stupid

Liberalism's keynote is that making the individuum free to make his/her decisions according to his/her reason and intellect will create the best society because what is best from an individual point of view is best for society as a whole. This is a contentious statement in itself, of course, but there is a more glaring issue with liberalism: the faculty for making reasonable choices must be built up by developing the mind through education. This is called "culture" and comes from the same root as cultivation and agriculture, i.e. a deliberate and artificial modification. Culture doesn't reproduce by infesting all children who come of age, and culture involves a weeding out of bad seed: in other words, mental violence and subjugation.

In other words, liberalism can only work when there is a single dominant culture forced upon the people which sets the standard of refinement and decency. Destroying that culture, installing "multiculturalism", "pluralism", "relativism" and other supposedly more free societal forms doesn't help liberalism - it kills it.

That's why the modern "liberal" states are made up of physically repulsive (fatasses and don't exercise), mentally immature (don't even read books or understand basic science), morally defunct (cheating, lying, selfish, don't understand the concept of duty) CONSUMERS enslaved by greedy corporations to lead a life that doesn't bring them happiness (the happiest nations are in the Third World), children (Westerners are going extinct), wisdom (stupidity is their banner) nor even a healthy life (always gulping on anti-depressants and other drugs). This is like leaving your daughter in the company of literators and composers versus the company of a drug-dealing gang - both are groups of mentally free and emancipated people, but the quality of the free choices they make is not the same.

Liberalism is dying under its own weight and only the new Conservative revolution will save the West and bring freedom instead of free-dumb.

>>19

Does not God exist merely to allow us to celebrate our weakness?

Hmm. No. Why would you think that? The creation is astounding, you are here to celebrate its beauty and try to reach its potential. That means, instead of being a hedonist pedo wallowing in self-loathing, you draw attention to the beautiful and the good.

Traditional morals are built upon celebration of weakness

Wrong again. All traditions in all civilzations developed to help strengthen people and allow them to reach their full potential. The point of civilization was to keep children healthy and safe so they could develop into well-rounded adults who would seek to celebrate the beauty of creation beyond simply indulging in negativity and escapism. You concept of "power structure" is Jewish-influenced. In non-Jewy social orders the powerful are a kind of slave -- saddled with responsibility of keeping the society safe and healthy enough to have that reflect into the family units. It is a duty, just like any other.

To question morals is a sign of strength

Attacking the traditions that were developed to keep kids safe and healthy is "strength"? No, it is the act of a resentful and hateful bully. We define rules to allow our energy to be directed into constructive activities rather than burning out in a blaze of destructive glory like a worthless piece of shit.

the true nature of humanity is to create civilizations that allow for the creative energies to build on ideas and concepts through the generations. Our creative potential exists in combination and through generations. Self-absorbed arrogance and an ego-driven approach to "finding my true nature" leads to nothingness. Alone you are worthless, within a society you can reach your potential. But, of course, according to you that is somehow a celebration of weakness? I think you might have fallen for one of those memes designed to destroy you, possibly nietzsche.