Name: Anonymous 2016-10-02 1:16
If nanobots replaced your neurons one by one with synthetic ones, would the end result be suicide or immortality? (And if it is suicide, at what point in the process does it become so--at the first neuron, the last, or some arbitrary progress percentage?)
If the above process is immortality and not suicide, then it follows that consciousness would persist from one form to another. Consider another process where your whole nervous system is copied as another identical but synthetic instance. Your original self would have to die (i.e., suicide or non-immortality) before the machine one could exist alone and achieve parity with the former result. If the former process is considered immortality, how can this one be considered suicide or non-immortality if the original self would still exist?
If the above process is immortality and not suicide, then it follows that consciousness would persist from one form to another. Consider another process where your whole nervous system is copied as another identical but synthetic instance. Your original self would have to die (i.e., suicide or non-immortality) before the machine one could exist alone and achieve parity with the former result. If the former process is considered immortality, how can this one be considered suicide or non-immortality if the original self would still exist?