HAS REDCREAM RESHAPED /LOUNGE/ AS WE KNOW IT?

If you look closely at the state of /lounge/s in 2015, you find that the presence or (forced) absence of RedCream is what defines the board. Let me demonstrate:

Since RedCream begun posting here this place has changed from /g/reddit-lite to quite pleasant -- even the Administrator turned from ban-happy asshole to non-entity after RedCream emerged as a prominent voice here.

All Tablecat's discussion is, of course, entirely dependent on RedCream to keep afloat.

World4ch went to utter shit and then implemented CAPTCHA for no reason. As soon as RedCream got banned.

4ct's /lounge/ is absolutely terrible and worthless as it has always been. RedCream has never posted there.

All other /lounge/s are wastelands with one or two middling threads posted a month, not worth mentioning here. Again, RedCream never posted on them.

In summary, it appears the presence of RedCream dictates whether a /lounge/ will be worth posting in or not. Has anybody else noticed this?

>>9
So why not delete it? I'll tell you why, moot let /pol/ remain because he likes to think of 4chan as some sort of den for freedom of speech when it's not. Tangentially, moot is kind of dumb, did you know that?
As for not being able to profit directly from 4chan, moot never once complained about how the sole reason investors chipped in to his doomed projects was because moot presented himself as "the founder of 4chan" (part of the pitch was "freedom of speech" hence not getting rid of /pol/). Incidentally, moot's investors are kind of dumb, did you know that?