>>10It's exactly as convincing as your initial post, dimwit. And almost as convincing as modern accepted cosmology theories.
>>11No, a singularity is a point in some space where some parameters become infinite or undefined. In our Universe, they are all finite and defined (except, perhaps, for a few select areas called "black holes", though that is still subject of controversy). Thus, our Universe cannot be a singularity. You can read about the various examples of singularities here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SingularityThere is no physical evidence for a "Big Bang". The theory of the Big Bang is quite controversial, as is evidenced by an obvious logical hole in it pointed out by the OP. Also, modern scientific status quo cannot explain why the Universe expansion is accelerating, which makes their understanding of the origins of the Universe even more questionable.
You would be laughed oar beaten out of any collegiate environment
So you're just an unscientific retard who believes in authority and reputation instead of thinking with your own head? Guess what, none of the idiots in all those "collegiate environments" can come up with a reasonable theory of gravity, let alone explain what "dark matter" or "dark energy" is. So what does it matter to me if some small group of retarded people laugh at me? They probably don't even have girlfriends.