Name: Anonymous 2022-06-07 20:23
Original: "How can mirrors be real if our eyes aren't real?"
I think there was a mistake here. The general case isn't eyes, it's mirrors, of which eyes are a particular case.
The syllogism would go: Mirrors aren't real, eyes are mirrors => eyes aren't real.
So, without the mistake and inversion, the quote would read: "How can our eyes be real if mirrors aren't real?"
I think there was a mistake here. The general case isn't eyes, it's mirrors, of which eyes are a particular case.
The syllogism would go: Mirrors aren't real, eyes are mirrors => eyes aren't real.
So, without the mistake and inversion, the quote would read: "How can our eyes be real if mirrors aren't real?"