Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

The Final Solution to The Incel Question

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-21 11:39

Yet I have to agree that these "Incels" pose an enormous existential problem the civilized world, in fact they are just a tip of the much larger iceberg. Ugly face is almost always connected with neural disorders and other health problems. Just look inside any psychiatric ward: they are literally filled with ugly people, and the more retarded the patient the uglier he looks. Same way baldness is correlated with numerous health issues. Face is the real passport of psyche, and a shitface is almost always an evidence of brain problems and bad genetics at play. Even if the ugly look is due to malnutrition, one still has bad genetics, because his parents have failed to provide him with good food. Of course one can get disfigured in a car accident, but that is no different: getting into a car accident increases chances of low IQ (DUI, driving cheap unsafe car, having slow reaction, etc...), therefore he is an evolutionary bankrupt too.

It doesn't take a Ph.D in evolutionary biology to infer that it would be a winning strategy for women to date only handsome males with high libido, because kids conceived from promiscuous males will carry their genes and will strive to have sex with as many other women as possible. And of course such alpha males should be physically fit. You can't have sex with 1000 women/year, if you look like some Elliot Rodger jewish-asiatic manlet freak. That is actually what my mother taught me about the rules guiding our society and how real men behave themselves.

High libido men are very sociably and actively search for multiple ex partners, they look nice and clean, make presents to women and paying them attention - this all shows a woman, that her wannabe partner will do everything to pass on his genes. And subconsciously it is very important for any woman, that her partner had many sex partners, as that means her children will also have many sex partners. From that we can conclude that female centered natural selection (matriarchy) is a all about mass procreation, while male center selection (patriarchy) is all about making tricky systems with draconian laws, where they can game the system by enslaving women. That is why women are naturally less creative and more into people than systems.

According to the Next Steps Project by University College London, which has been tracking people born in 1989-1990, around 12.5% of them were still virgins at the age of 26. Since this figure naturally includes more men than women, we might actually have to adjust the estimate from 10% to 15% or even 20% of men being Incels. That is a huge number of freaks and creeps threatening the future of humanity: these 20% of men are constantly thinking and scheming about gaming the system and enslaving women, drowning humanity in the new dark ages, because that is the only chance to procreate for these ugly degenerate monsters. It is no secret, that ISIS was formed from young sexually frustrated males, like the western Incels, who were unable to find their niche and sexual partner in the polygamous Islamic world.

Given that, I propose starting the war on ugly. We need a good old genocide to cleanse the humanity from this genetic trash. Only brutal eugenics can solve the ugly question. Until we start killing ugly people, there will be mass shootings, like that of Elliot Rodger. As said Fyodor Dostoevsky, "only beauty will save the world", of course Dostoevsky referred to Jews and the Jewish culture (Fyodor really hated non-Christians), but we can extrapolate that to the whole humanity, without regards to religion, and then we will see many ugly things, not worth saving or investing into. If we simply kill all ugly children, there will be no such obnoxious virgin losers. That must be the final solution to the Incel question.

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-21 15:22

I don't see a single question mark in the post, so what exacty is the question?

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-21 16:02

Good thread.

We don't need outright genocide or eugenics though. We just need women to have more freedom (feminism) to continue the sexual selection they have been doing for tens of thousands of years prior to the development of religion/monogamy (a manipulative reproductive strategy created by betas).

Just look at the countries that had arranged marriage: India, Pakistan, China. All the males are ugly, scrawny manlets. In the free West, they can't compete sexually against European and African males, who evolved under sexual selection. Arranged marriage is just the exaggerated version of regular marriage, which asymptotically will turn all Westerners into frail Indian types if it is allowed to continue. Marriage is dysgenic because it lets inferior sperm find wombs, whereas naturally only the top sperm (top 5th percentile) would reproduce. Genetics has proven that on average you have 20x more female ancestors than male ancestors. (The uglier you are, probably the more male ancestors you have.)

Feminism is the answer, but in the long term future there is a risk of sex-starved masses revolting against the righteous matriarchy, so I do see the argument for genociding unaesthetic babies.

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-21 18:25

The "blackpill" incels are a special kind of sad.
Inventing massive delusions about the whole world being centered around looks, trying to drag everyone they can down to their level in some deranged self-hate exercise.
>>1,3
Why don't you just kill yourself? You're clearly in pain over your own perceived inadequacies. Do you lack the willpower to do what you really want?

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-21 19:05

>>2
*query curl

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-21 19:05

>>4
*sniff sniff* I smell cope.

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-21 19:14

>>3
continue the sexual selection
I used to think this would help, but then I smartened up and realized that women carry incel genes that are expressed in their male children and no amount of chad genes from the father can stop its expression. This is a complex issue, but we can begin to solve it by leaving all babies out in the weather for the first night they are born.

It is well known that being physically healthy indicates mental health which indicates you have a good enough personality for women to want to fuck you (a non-incel). Thus culling any baby that cannot survive out in the weather when fresh from the womb may just be the solution we are looking for.

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-22 0:48

>>7
women carry incel genes that are expressed in their male children and no amount of chad genes from the father can stop its expression.
This is the predominant reason incels even exist: all women reproduce, no matter how trash their genetics are.

But even if all women reproduce, but they only reproduce with Chads, then the frequency of the incel genes will decrease over time. Let I be an incel gene frequency, C be the Chad gene frequency, and n be the generation:

FemaleGeneration_n = 0.5 FemaleGeneration_(n-1) + 0.5 C

ex:

FemaleGeneration_0 = [0.5 I, 0.5 C]
FemaleGeneration_1 = 0.5 [.5 I, .5 C] + 0.5 [0 I, 1.0 C] = [.25 I, .75 C]
FemaleGeneration_2 = 0.5 [.25 I, .75 C] + 0.5 [0 I, 1.0 C] = [.125 I, .875 C]
.
.
.
FemaleGeneration_∞ = [0 I, 1.0 C]


By solely breeding females with the top males, the incel genes they carry can be eradicated. Shame about the male children they have, though.

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-22 1:00

>>8
the incel genes they carry can be eradicated
Not so. Genetic traits are very complex and the "alpha genes" don't necessarily express in an "alpha way" especially if combined with the woman's genes which may or may not be alpha by themselves or in combination. Example: A short woman marries a tall man and one son is short and the other is tall. But even if the tall son marries a tall woman, his sons might express the short genes that he (and possibly her) carry. And that's a very simple physical trait, if we look at about attitude / intelligence / subtle physical features like face shape / etc. it becomes impossible to predict.

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-22 1:16

>>9
This makes the progression nonlinear but doesn't change the trend toward Chaddom. While it's possible for a tall man and tall woman to have short kids, there is a greater probability that they have tall kids. The same applies to other traits like face and intelligence. It just takes a very long time. Evolution is measured on the order of hundreds of thousands of years. If selection didn't work, we'd still be primitive Homo erectus monkeys. With an actual eugenic program, the process can be sped up. Cows used to have massive horns just a couple hundred years ago before they were domesticated and subject to eugenics.

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-22 1:16

Feminism is the eugenic program.

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-22 2:46

>>10
non linear progression
Except it's not "progression" and I explained why. I'm a little creeped out by your inability to understand my very clear post, as it indicates you are some kind of sexual masochist incel who jerks off to the idea that women are selecting men who are better than you. But as I have shown, there is no way to improve genetics through sexual selection due to gene combinations and actual expression being impossible to predict or guide.

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-22 2:52

Why are people refusing to admit that the only way to improve humanity is to put newborns out in the weather overnight? Sexual selection is a giant fail, I'll never understand why autists think "genes" are simple and get passed on 1:1.

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-22 4:06

Consider this: A pack of wild Niggers.
Savage, slavering Niggers nearing your white home. Trampling your white lawn. Raping your white daughter.
And you can't do shit since they're savages. The Nigger leader grabs your wife and fucks her with his shaman stick.
The primal Niggers finally dominate your household. They watch barbaric shows on TV and you are forced to be their slave.
Such is the downfall of White Man.

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-22 6:58

Consider this: A pack of wild Chads.
Savage, slavering Chads nearing your civilized home. Trampling your civilized lawn. Raping your civilized daughter.
And you can't do shit since they're genetically superior. The Chad leader grabs your wife and fucks her with his shaman stick to produce more Chads.
The primal Chads finally dominate your household. They watch barbaric shows on TV and you are forced to be their slave.
Such is the downfall of White Civilization.

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-23 20:07

Josh Stalin was the biggest Incel:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kommunistka
>Armand, Kollontai or Krupskaya addressed issues such as sexuality, abortion, marriage and divorce, the relationship between sexes, free love, morality, family, motherhood or the liberation of women from the slavery of men.
>The magazine finally disappeared in 1930 together with the Zhenotdel itself under the Stalinist mandate.[5]

not surprising, the manlet Stalin could only take women by force.

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-24 9:08

>>16
As a result of an illness or an accident in childhood, the left hand did not develop properly, remained noticeably shorter than the right, and did not chronically bend at the elbow. His face was chipped after smallpox suffered in childhood (in common people it was called “pockmarked” - 30, 107). The second and third toes on the left foot were spliced ​​together. He never grew higher than 160 cm (“I noticed that when he was photographed, he would climb a step higher than others ...” - 200, 25) ... Having all these shortcomings, Stalin must have experienced constant oppression feeling of inferiority.

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-24 19:07

>>3
We need to legalize rape, so the alphas can impregnate as many women as possible without getting bogged down with this consent bullshit tbh.

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-25 9:31

>>1
Cyanide-laden waifu pillows.
Edit:Preferable with pillow arms. Edited on 25/03/2019 09:32.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List