instagram is an imageboard with identities

normies copied us smh

except that image boards have way more text

instagram is just starbucks drinks and meals and selfies and shit, where someone pretends their life is more interesting than it actually is

no discussion to be had, just narcissism from uploaders and voyeurism from lurkers

>>2
on popular people’s posts there are shit tons of text

>>3

500 comments that consist of 2 words and like 4 emojis each

not exactly real discourse

Normies post memes on there sometimes, but I would say Twitter is more equivalent to an imageboardreddit, since you can also reply with images on there.

>>5
Twitter is a text-based PvP game where people try to get each other fired for their political opinions.

When you think about it twitter is the worst thing to ever happen to our civilization.

@7 They didn't even ban Blumpf, the notorious Nazi Fascist Pig Dictator. How can Twitter ever recover from this?

There's not a single person left in the world who believes merit and success are anything but inversely related in the West, and that's thanks to Twitter allowing celebrities, politicians, journalists, businessmen, and other pillars of society to give hot takes unfiltered.

@9 Selfies destroyed Western Civilization. This is why we need Sharia.

>>9

I wonder if people legitimately came to these neo-communist conclusions, or if it's propaganda. Like a concerted effort with sockpoppet accounts and stuff to get tags trending, and to try and shift public opinion into accepting this commie shit.

But you know what's funny? It's a weird brand of western communism/socialism, which includes LGBT, multiculturalism, etc. But in actual communist regimes, that shit would've resulted in people getting gulag'd.

And then there's the whole "but that wasn't REAL communism" whenever you bring up examples of failures. And they get triggered if you mention Venezuela.

Venezuela failed due to nigs. Communism would be just fine in the ethnostate.

>>9 Normies, maybe ?

>>12
Look up what ethnicity the U.S.S.R. was dumbfuck

>>9

There's not a single person left in the world who believes merit and success are anything but inversely related in the West

well this is kind of true and not just in the West

not everyone who is successful is some genius choir boi. in fact very few genius choir bois ever make it. most rich businessmen or famous people got their success through dirty shit and fucked up narcissistic/sociopathic personalities. you gotta crack a few eggs to make an omelette. that's just the way the game of life is played. don't get mad at me, I didn't make the rules, evolution did.

Kim Kardashian and Zuckerberg are successful, not some moralfag dweebs that win Fields medals.

I really think you need to correct your definition of "merit." merit should mean the actions that bring you personal success (making your statement a contradiction), not actions that make you internally feel good when you see other people doing them ("moralfaggotry").

>>15

I really think you need to correct your definition of "merit

Wow, that's pretty cucked dude. Why can't I just say the truth" Kardashian has no merit and does not deserve his "success". To say anything less would be weasily and dishonest, have some standards for god's sake.

>>15 Agreed !

>>17
*>>16

>>16
The Kardashians deserve their success. they provided people with something they wanted. That’s just the only way the market works and is the way it should work. Why should someone be rewarded for something that no one actually wants (like proving some pure math conjecture from the 1700s)?