Can Feel Yo Boy Cucking Out

Mmmm. Yo boy 'bout to cuck it, lads. I can feel it.

>>53

A reaction against the kikes' communism.

It was still a reaction carried out by white people; a certain group of white people were responsible for fascism unless we somehow decide that people shouldn't be held responsible for their own actions. Furthermore, the fascists initially joined forces with communists to invade a non-communist country, and the ultimate outcome of the war (which the fascists started) was severe loss of life and damage to infrastructure in countries that were neither communist nor fascist (mostly at the hands of fascist armies) and to leave the communists a more powerful force in Europe than they were before the war.

Thus, even though fascism was a reactionary anti-communist movement, you can't say that everything bad that fascism did was ``actually the result of communism". Not only was fascism excessive, leading to the harm of innocent non-communists, it was also an utter failure that ended up strengthening communism.

Better an honest authoritarian regime than an anything goes plutocratic "democracy" that pretends to care about you only to fleece you dry.

A true democracy puts political power in the hands of the people, an authoritarian regime does precisely the opposite. While many ``democratic" societies give the average citizen relatively little power over how the government treats them, there is still the fact that the whole philosophy of government means it is considered immoral and shameful for the government to go against the wishes of the people. Whereas authoritarians reject that notion entirely, instead buying into an elitist philosophy that says the masses are too dumb to know what is good for them; such a society does not merely deny political power to the masses, but leads to the notion that it is a good thing. So authoritarianism is ``good" if you're the one in charge (you won't be) or if you like the idea of being on the unpleasant end of a power imbalance.