1. Won't work without javascript enabled 2. Won't work without flash enabled 3. Targets messages towards and/or denies entry to adblock users 4. Infinite scrolling instead of numbered pages 5. Splits a small article into multiple pages to generate more clicks and/or display transitional ads 6. Contains 40MB of javascript moving elements and other bloat cancer when the information the user is looking for is no more than 5-10KB in size 7. Opens popups without the user's request 8. Disables right-clicking 9. Will not let the user directly save media such as images or video 10. Embedded social media buttons 11. Embedded Google-anything 12. Makes the user consent to being tracked before being allowed to access a page
Name:
Anonymous2017-02-07 4:09
13. Overly-large font 15. Autoplay video 16. Animated favicon 17. Overly-small font 18. Option to sign up for a newsletter 19. Picture of the supposed webmaster or author 20. Any kind of overlay occurring
25. a header/footer that always stays on top/bottom, messing up the ability to read with pgup/pgdwn 26. thinks privacy badger is an ad blocker 27. forced registration 28. forced social media integration 29. nag screen of any kind 30. doesn't work with proxy/vpn/TOR 31. shitty unicode that doesn't work on linux/old windows/anything other than ishit 32. links to author's twitter which contains a mixture of political activism, le ironic maymays and links to programming blogs 33. dubs
Name:
Anonymous2017-02-07 10:26
If it has Redcream, it's a massive red flag.
Name:
Anonymous2017-02-07 12:16
>>2 Overly-large font with unreadably thin and light strokes
>>14 He needed to make it clearer, dude, don't apologize for him.
Name:
Anonymous2017-02-13 7:57
Fake quotes are so prevalent that everybody is on edge. If there is any question at all on the source of your quote, somebody will jump down your throat over it. Linking to the post you are quoting is only good enough if you are quoting the whole post. When quoting only a portion of the post, you need to include further details on where we can source your quote within the post.
Name:
Anonymous2017-02-13 13:34
34. Opening a hyperlink in a new tab results in javascript.void(0)
Name:
Anonymous2017-02-13 15:27
>>16 No, go write a browser with a fucking search function if it's so important to you.
35. You need to register in order to post 36. The registration forces the use of passwords 37. You need to register in order to download 38. The password in the login and/or registration pages are not being recognised by the browser 39. Forces the use of some weird two factor auth shit with secret words or with facebook/google/some other service. 40. Needs your mail for registration or in order to post. 41. Refuses to allow you to post if you spoof or trim the http referer.
Name:
Anonymous2017-02-14 19:41
42. Has a "download manager" instead of just giving you the actual file.
Name:
Anonymous2017-02-14 21:50
43. cheaps out on https certificate, causing immense hardship to visitors who have to jump through hoops to access the site 44. Doesn't warn you that it uses cookies
43. cheaps out on https certificate, causing immense hardship to visitors who have to jump through hoops to access the site
What do you mean?
44. Doesn't warn you that it uses cookies
Just set your browser to warn you.
Name:
Anonymous2017-02-15 2:22
>>27 without proper certificate the https causes a browser-specific block page that require several clicks to access within. All the browsers do have this.
>>27 It is illegal to not warn of cookies. Why would you enter a illegal site ?
Name:
Anonymous2017-02-15 3:24
without proper certificate
What is "proper certificate" even supposed to mean? Does it mean revoked? Using a broken algorithm? Using NSA curves? Using a RSA/DSA/DH bit length less than 2Kio? Using a broken or almost broken hash algorithm to sign the cert? Using static DH certs?
the https causes
The https protocol (http over tls) causes nothing of that sort.
It is illegal to not warn of cookies
[citation needed]
Why would you enter a illegal site ?
gelbooru/danbooru/exhentai/pixiv are all illegal in many countries such as the uk and canada as well as in some states of USA. I can however think of many reasons of why you would wish to use them. Moreover illegal does not mean bad, all of the above sites are good.
>>29 1. Here is what I want you to do: copy the string https://bbs.progrider.org/lounge/ and paste it into a browser you haven't used lately. For me, that browser was Chrome. Here is what I found:
Your connection is not private Attackers might be trying to steal your information from bbs.progrider.org (for example, passwords, messages, or credit cards). NET::ERR_CERT_DATE_INVALID Automatically report details of possible security incidents to Google. Privacy policy
But similar warning signs are found in Safari, Firefox, Edge, etc. This warning results from poor maintenance of https certificate from the web master end.
Your connection is not private Attackers might be trying to steal your information from bbs.progrider.org (for example, passwords, messages, or credit cards). NET::ERR_CERT_DATE_INVALID Automatically report details of possible security incidents to Google. Privacy policy
You should blame let's encrypt for releasing certificates with short expiration dates.
This warning results from poor maintenance of https certificate from the web master end.
I did not use Chrome. As is clear in that previous statement I required a browser I did not use lately to show you how your post was in error.
Second, a cookie is a cookie. There is no special cookie for tracking, all cookies is open to access from interested parties and must be exposed in warning to allow users to not accept.